sacha's Discussions (646)

Discussions Replied To (350) Replies Latest Activity

"Richard, this is great: Instead of removing all comments that are in violation, I…"

sacha replied Sep 25, 2010 to A discussion of the rules: rule #3

128 Sep 30
Reply by Adam

"Richard, you have cleared a few things up for me and I appreciate the fact that you…"

sacha replied Sep 24, 2010 to A discussion of the rules: rule #3

128 Sep 30
Reply by Adam

"Honestly, MoJoe, you will receive responses more to your liking if you were to come…"

sacha replied Sep 24, 2010 to A discussion of the rules: rule #3

128 Sep 30
Reply by Adam

"Reductio ad absurdum In formal logic, the reductio ad absurdum is a legitimate argum…"

sacha replied Sep 24, 2010 to A discussion of the rules: rule #3

128 Sep 30
Reply by Adam

"what was the ad hominem, MoJoe? I have read all of the posts on "rules". I feel as…"

sacha replied Sep 23, 2010 to A discussion of the rules: rule #3

128 Sep 30
Reply by Adam

"Wow - it is a lot easier to tell everyone to just suck it up. hahahaha instead of…"

sacha replied Sep 23, 2010 to A discussion of the rules: rule #3

128 Sep 30
Reply by Adam

"Just to be clear, Dave Rogers has not left. He is currently suspended, which is agai…"

sacha replied Sep 23, 2010 to A discussion of the rules: rule #3

128 Sep 30
Reply by Adam

"John, Let me give you an example of how to conduct a civil debate... you are extrem…"

sacha replied Sep 23, 2010 to A discussion of the rules: rule #3

128 Sep 30
Reply by Adam

"The locking threads comment was directed toward Richard, sorry for the confusion."

sacha replied Sep 22, 2010 to A discussion of the rules: rule #3

128 Sep 30
Reply by Adam

"strawman"

sacha replied Sep 22, 2010 to A discussion of the rules: rule #3

128 Sep 30
Reply by Adam

RSS

© 2018   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: The Nexus Group.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service