Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris or Christopher Hitchens? And why?

I think Richard Dawkins is my favorite horseman, (If you don't get the reference the four aforementioned atheists did a two hour documentary where they spoke about atheism, morality, and religion called "The Four Horsemen.") he seems so nice and approachable. Not mention he has a great sense of humor.

However, I think I'd rather have dinner with Hitchens out of the four. I'm a smart-ass anti-theist atheist, just like Hitchens. I think we would have a great conversation about the absurdity of religion, and how its a plague that needs to be vanquished. It would be a great night with a lot of laughs and smart-ass comments...

Views: 43

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

One of my friends is just completing his doctorate at Oxford, and has met Dawkins on several occasions. He says that without a doubt Dawkins is one of the most sour, arrogant, judgmental men he has ever met.

Given my friend is not in the sciences, I can imagine what Dawkins might think of people in his program, and perhaps that has influenced their interactions.

But I think that this has changed my preference if I had but one Horseman to choose.

The winner: Sam Harris

I would be very, very interested in discussing his insights into neurology. His points on beliefs having a physiological impact in the "End of Faith" were absolutely revolutionary to me, and took some of my thinking in directions I would not have gone in without him.

I really think Hitchens would be the best party guest of the lot, what with the smoking and drinking and general rabble rousing and all, but I wouldn't waste a wish on sharing a Horseman with my friends. I'd want one all to myself, and I think I'd have the most to learn from Harris.

I really like Dennett, and I think he'd be my runner up. If you haven't seen my posts in the Free Will DNE forum yet, I have a particular interest in that subject. I'd absolutely love to talk it out with Dennett.

As for Dawkins, I think I have less to learn from him than from Harris or Dennett. I'm not a biologist. We could discuss the operational tactics and strategy of the atheist movement, which would be engrossing, but I think I'd prefer the antics of Hitchens as an enduring memory. Unless, of course, I could persuade Dawkins to give me a job as a Director of Communications for RDF!
Hey since this is a fantasy dinner - I'm taking away the restriction that they be alive.

I'd also go for two people at the same time:

- The Pope
- Jesus (the man behind the myth - assuming there was one)

Jesus: "Benedict, I was joking when I said that, lighten up. I can't believe they wrote all that crap down. Those disciples never really got what I was about, no wonder you're all in this mess".

Pope Benedict XVI: "You're not planning any interviews are you"?

Jesus: "Well I've got a book deal brewing - Dawkins is doing the foreword, I don't think you're going to like it. Can I have some more of that cheesecake stuff"?

Pope Benedict XVI: "There's plenty in your beard".


Support Atheist Nexus

Supporting Membership

Nexus on Social Media:

Latest Activity

Loren Miller posted a status
"Meeting this morning was kicked off by the mayor of Madison, who in words at the very least supports the FFRF! Very, very welcome!"
14 minutes ago
James Smith commented on Evilgenius20's video
41 minutes ago
James Smith commented on James Smith's video
50 minutes ago
James Smith posted a video

Becoming Free

How the bible set me free.
54 minutes ago
Rock posted photos
56 minutes ago
Randall Smith replied to Loren Miller's discussion bending truth, or "We Can All Be Manipulated" (TheraminTrees) in the group Hang With Friends
56 minutes ago
Sally Ride is now a member of Atheist Nexus
58 minutes ago
Michael Penn commented on Gregory Phillip Dearth's blog post Morality: Subjective vs Objective - but does it MATTER?
1 hour ago

© 2015   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service