Alabama’s chief justice: Buddha didn’t create us so First Amendment only protects Christians

Speaking at the Pastor for Life Luncheon, which was sponsored by Pro-Life Mississippi, Chief Justice Roy Moore of the Alabama Supreme Court declared that the First Amendment only applies to Christians because “Buddha didn’t create us, Mohammed didn’t create us, it was the God of the Holy Scriptures” who created us.

“They didn’t bring the Koran over on the pilgrim ship,” he continued. “Let’s get real, let’s go back and learn our history. Let’s stop playing games.”

He then noted that he loves talking to lawyers, because he is a lawyer who went to “a secular law school,” so he knows that “in the law, [talking about God] just isn’t politically correct.” He claimed that this is why America has “lost its way,” and that he would be publishing a pamphlet “this week, maybe next” that contained copies of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, thereby proving that all the people “who found this nation — black, white, all people, all religions, all faiths” knew that America was “about God.”

Chief Justice Moore later defined “life” via Blackstone’s Law — a book that American lawyers have “sadly forgotten” — as beginning when “the baby kicks.” “Today,” he said, “our courts say it’s not alive ’til the head comes out.”

“Now,” he continued, “if technology’s supposed to increase our knowledge, how did we become so stupid?” Discussing Thomas Jefferson’s use of “life” in the Declaration of Independence, he said that “when [Jefferson] put ‘life’ in there, it was in the womb — we know it begins at conception. Why aren’t we going the right way instead of the wrong way?”

He later said that “you can’t be happy unless you follow God’s law, and if you follow God’s law, you can’t help but be happy.”

“It’s all about God,” he continued. “We’ve made ‘life’ a decision taken by man,” he said, and “taken ‘liberty,’ and converted it to ‘licentiousness. We’ve taken ‘pursuit of happiness,’ and reduced it to materialism.”

Views: 534

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Unfortunately for the State of Alabama, its Chief Justice is ignorant of the law as it has been interpreted by the Supreme Court in a case involving Alabama, namely WALLACE v. JAFFREE, 472 U.S. 38 (1985):

"At one time it was thought that this right merely proscribed the preference of one Christian sect over another, but would not require equal respect for the conscience of the infidel, the atheist, or the adherent of a non-Christian faith such as Islam or Judaism. But when the underlying principle has been examined in the crucible of litigation, the Court has unambiguously concluded that the individual freedom of conscience protected by the First Amendment embraces the right to select any religious faith or none at all. This conclusion derives support not only from the interest in respecting the individual's freedom of conscience, but also from the conviction that religious beliefs worthy of respect are the product of free and voluntary choice by the faithful."

Allan, may I post this on Twitter? 

Yes, of course. I don't tweet myself.

Roy should be removed from the bench. He clearly has no inkling of Constitutional law or the deist views of the Founders who would clearly view him as a case study in why there must be a separation between church and state.

A mass influx of emails or other forms of protests is effective, Not in changing the minds of bigots, but in providing those who disagree with him in his own neighborhood courage to take action at the ballot box. It is so terribly difficult to stand alone against one's neighbor in philosophical matters. With outside support, some may stand up in opposition.

Also, when going to court on some matter, is it possible to not go to a known bigot judge? Some legal opinion needed here.  

He was removed once. He had a large stone monument placed outside the courthouse with the Ten Commandments on it. He was ordered to remove it by a federal judge and refused to do so. The Alabama Court of the Judiciary then removed him from office. He was elected Chief Justice after a ten year absence during which he tried to run for governor of Alabama and president without much success in either endeavor.

Thanks Allan, one would think that after being "bitch slapped" and removed from office once before that this fascist would never been allowed to hold any public office. Yet, here he is now the Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court. This is yet another example of how persistent the fascist 1% is. Theocracy goes hand and hand with the oligarchy that the neo liberals have plotted since the Reagan era. If the people don't start to mobilize against these fascists then prepare for Orewell's vision to be our reality.

It's a strange case. The people of Alabama would not support him for governor or in the presidential primary, but they did support him for Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, an elected position in the state. My reading of it is that they were willing to thumb their noses at those opposed to bringing religion into the courthouse, but not willing to go so far as to elect him to an office where he could do administrative damage.

Moore has enunciated a principle that sits well with Alabamians—that the law of God is superior to the law of man and consequently anything which places the Constitution or other man-made laws above the law of God is null and void, at least in Alabama.

How timely this thread is in lieu of the Monday 04.05.2014 SCOTUS decision stating that prayers to commence small government meetings is Constitutional. The march of the neo-liberal fascist agenda continues.

What is Neo-liberal about it? 

This man is a real idiot!

I read something else the other day about a woman who claimed she was christian and she believed in standing her ground. What the hell is this facination with Jesus and guns?

neoliberalism, n. 

1. (Government, Politics & Diplomacy) a modern politico-economic theory favouring free trade, privatization, minimal government intervention in business, reduced public expenditure on social services, etc
2. (Economics) a modern politico-economic theory favouring free trade, privatization, minimal government intervention in business, reduced public expenditure on social services, etc

ˌneoˈliberal adjn

Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged © HarperCollins Publishers 1991, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2003

Henry A. Giroux: Can Democratic Education Survive in a Neoliberal S...

"Public education is under assault by a host of religious, economic, ideological and political fundamentalists. The most serious attack is being waged by advocates of neoliberalism, whose reform efforts focus narrowly on high-stakes testing, traditional texts and memorization drills. At the heart of this approach is an aggressive attempt to disinvest in public schools, replace them with charter schools, and remove state and federal governments completely from public education in order to allow education to be organized and administered by market-driven forces.[1] Schools would “become simply another corporate asset bundled in credit default swaps,” valuable for their rate of exchange and trade value on the open market.[2] It would be an understatement to suggest that there is something very wrong with American public education. For a start, this counter-revolution is giving rise to punitive evaluation schemes, harsh disciplinary measures, and the ongoing deskilling of many teachers that together are reducing many excellent educators to the debased status of technicians and security personnel."


© 2018   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: The Nexus Group.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service