Daniel Dennett on William Lane Craig and many other things

Daniel Dennett on the criterion of mindbogglingness in science and many other things

Views: 854

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Daniel Dennett is a pain in the arse. What does he know, anyway. He's just not needed. He's boring too.

Why do you find him a pain in the arse?

As for boring, that takes two. 

It's love that takes two, not boredom.

Dennett is an old fart who shouldn't be on prime-Internet-time and should be relegated elsewhere or censored altogether.

Being bored requires something to find boring, and a tendency to be bored, that's what I mean. 

Did you listen to the video? 

Dennett is OK, Nappy. Just imagine you might live as long as he has. Then you would be an old fart.

Dennett has written a lot of interesting books.  Freedom Evolves is the one that meant most to me. 

He says interesting things in the video. 

Michael, I'm an old fart (83) who lives with a bunch of old farts (average ~78).

When one of us goes off like Nappy is doing here, we ask him if he forgot his meds.

As for knowing the universe' cause, I have two answers:

1) Will my knowing its cause help me pay the rent?

2) Only unhappy people need to know its cause. (I was once a Catholic and unhappy.)

As for knowing the universe' cause, Only unhappy people need to know its cause.

Hm, what makes you think that?

Luara, try being young with a normal supply of hormones, a Catholic, and NOT a submissive.

BTW, I know how to be Machiavellian. The more people who wait for happiness in a future life, the fewer people I have to share this life' happiness with.

Happiness isn't a zero-sum thing so I'm Machiavellian only when I'm pissed at religious folk.

You didn't answer my question, why wouldn't a happy person want to know the reason for it all? 

Luara, I didn't say happy people wouldn't want to know the reason for it all.

I said only unhappy people need to know the universe' cause.

Those two statements are logically equivalent.

"B is true only if A is true" is logically equivalent to

"A is false implies B is false". 

Your statement that "only unhappy people need to know the cause of the universe" is logically equivalent to "Happy people don't need to know the cause of the universe."




Update Your Membership :




Nexus on Social Media:


© 2018   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service