Is it just me? Lately many of the things I read contain glaring errors. It first hit me while reading Tim Tyler's Memetics.

"If memetics explains only explains the imitation of observed behavior, ..." (p 96)

"Perhaps biological an cultural differ..." (p 173)

"Genetic engineers can now take information form wherever they like..."

"However, not everyone seems agree that ..." (both on p 184)

"The upright gait hypothesis hypothesis is interesting for several reasons." (p 206)

I thought, "Didn't the editor even read this? Who was this?" But, lo, no editor was credited. There was no editor! Is this a new cost-cutting trend in publishing?

But the news lately has been just as bad.

It is original from the Andean area of South Africa and widely grown in both the north of Chile and Argentina and the south Mexico, especially Ecuador.

A Promising Fruit: The Tree Tomato

That sample was from today's Science Daily. Yesterday I noticed four or five glaring errors. This is disorienting, even a little scary. Has literacy decline crossed a tipping point?

Views: 1359

Replies to This Discussion

That is so clever! I never think of things like that!

Seen at a Barnes & Noble bookstore! "Art of Writting"

(jmawork/flickr)

Ruth and I share a love for tea, but we won't be hiring whoever made this shop's frosted glass lettering!(roger.w800/flickr)

(both from the "More Worser Grammar" flickr group)

Cat, that's because they hire minimally educated employees at minimum wage! Well, in reality, learning to spell and punctuate English requires the memorization of many irregular words, PLUS the knowledge of phonics that many elementary teachers don't know themselves, so they ONLY rely on memorization. Which is foolish, because a person just can't remember all those words, and their permutations. I have met a few teachers who did know phonic rules (drives me crazy when people refer to this as phonetics!), and were able to instill those rules into their pupils. More time ought to be spent on learning how the written language works, and less time on rote spelling tests. But you're still going to see mistakes, because English is HARD! :-)

Aye dont remember whut Inglish in skool wuz like, but they must've done something rite.

Yes! All the special-case rules, and things we have to simply memorize! Never mind the words we've borrowed from all over the globe; I remember reading about how English spelling is a "fossil record" of earlier pronunciations, now forgotten. Spelling moved towards being standardized (or standardised :-) with the rise of printing, around the same time major shifts in pronunciation, including the Great Vowel Shift, were happening.

(Don't have links handy, except for Douglas Harper's Online Etymology Dictionary off the top of my head: www.etymonline.com. From there I learned that "one", with its spelling weirdly disconnected from the pronunciation we know, originally sounded like "own", as in "only", "alone", and "atone". A 14th-century regional pronunciation from southwest and west England ended up taking over by the 18th century.)

At least the grammar is reasonably simple, compared to many of the world's languages!

Sometimes people do the right thing for the wrong reasons. There's the "security guard" who earned his quotation marks (shared earlier in Hang With Friends) and there are the Bibles labeled as fiction by a Costco warehouse.

This example, which I saw today, is also apropos to No Nonsense Atheists and to Health and Fitness.

This label for a homeopathic drug (Arnica) uses quotation marks correctly! It says, among other things:

Drug Facts: Active ingredient listed above. Use for symptoms listed below.... These "Uses" have not been evaluated by the FDA.

Another unwittingly correct use of quotation marks, this time on a protest sign:

Protester holding sign: GIVE GOD HIS ''RIGHTS''

Finally, an explanation for all those wayward "grocers' apostrophe's" that seem to be there solely to signal "beware of oncoming S":

(from Mo Viele's blog Fontidious)

the apostrophic epidemic

I often wonder who patient zero was.

I imagine that some lowly shopkeeper went out to paint “Bananas $3” on his sign, and was stricken with an uncontrollable urge to add an apostrophe. And soon his banana was the proud owner of $3. Not to be outdone, his rival down the street advertised “Banana’s 2 Dollar’s.” Then someone from the town full of affluent bananas went on a trip, carrying the contagion with him. “Train’s Departing Every 5 Minute’s.”

The pandemic had begun.

Found on the web:

(Grocery customer nonplussed at bins of TOMATOE'S, POTATO'S, and APOSTROPHE'S)

Why not in'sert them before 's's in the middle of word's a's well???

I just found this while looking for something else... apostrophes aren't just for plural's anymore:

Wall sign for LEE'S TEXA'S [sic] STYLE BAR-B-Q

Texa's Style Bar-B-Q .... let's see what Grammarly does with this.

Answer from Grammarly: "unnecessary ellipses".

Oh my gosh, Grammarly didn't catch it. OK! so much for the big "G"!

RSS

line

Update Your Membership :

Membership

line

line

Nexus on Social Media:

line

© 2017   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service