You seem to have missed some pretty important aspects of those pages...
but that those words and phrases that correspond with standard Christian formulae are additions from a Christian copyist
the earliest surviving manuscript containing the passage is an 11th century Christian scribal copy
Confirming my point exactly... I was speaking of original documents, I give absolutely no weight to xtian copied documents.
"You seem to have missed some pretty important aspects of those pages..."
Oh the irony.
I've done my homework on this subject, pal. I suggest you do the same before you stumble into a discussion with no knowledge of the subject.
"but that those words and phrases that correspond with standard Christian formulae are additions from a Christian copyist"
And had you gone on to read the page in full, you would find out that most scholars agree that the Testimonium Flavianum has been altered to (that's what the word "additions" means), but that there was an authentic reference there to be altered in the first place.
But that's just talking about the TF. The other reference in Josephus is virtually uncontested, and the same goes for the reference in Tacitus.
Which means we have at worst two and most likely three references to Jesus in non-religious documents which were written within several decades of his death.
Which means your statements were garbage.
"Confirming my point exactly... I was speaking of original documents, I give absolutely no weight to xtian copied documents."
You never actually said that you were talking about original documents, actually.
But that's not even the point: the standard you've set is completely ridiculous. We don't have any original documents of anything that anyone has ever written in the ancient world. Not from Caesar, not from Cicero, not from anyone. All documents we have are copied at least several times (usually by Christians, though not always). So if you're going to dismiss the references to Jesus on the basis of the relevant documents not being original, you might as well dismiss the existence of anything and everyone in the ancient world.
Please do your homework and then try to make your case.
I have, it explicitely says year 1100...
We have original documents... we have the scrolls, many dating to the first century, THOSE do not speak of Jesus.
"We have original documents... we have the scrolls, many dating to the first century, THOSE do not speak of Jesus."
Alright Mr. I am incapable of doing my homework, please tell me (and the entire historical community who will be equally surprised) where exactly I can find the original documents of the Tacitus' Annales or Josephus' Antiquities.
Or are you talking out of your ass once again?
I am truly starting to wonder about your reading abilities...
Truthfully, think of it for a just a second... if I was talking about your references, we wouldn't be arguing about this right???????????
Of course I'm talking of the Dead Sea Scrolls and other original biblical manuscripts, originals.
But it's become sadly obvious that discussing this with you is completely futile.... adios.
And if you paid any attention at all to your correspondants, you would know I was not a Mr...