I wanted to put this question out there to see how strongly everyone feels on this subject. Being that most of us trust in scientific fact and reasoning, I was wondering if everyone is absolutely, undeniably, 100% sure that a god doesn't exist.  I personally take into account that there is no proof of any cosmic creator so therefore I am about 99.9999% sure that there is no god. However we all agree that science is an ever evolving field and I don't think that there will ever be any proof to support the existence of a supreme being, but I can't be 100% sure until there is concrete proof against one. I would like to know what all of your thoughts on this.  

Views: 14356

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Hi Amanda,

I don't care enough to bother being sure one way or the other.

You live near a missile range??????

No wonder you don't care :)

Dude, I wouldn't be going back there.

Out of interest, can you hear them go off sometimes, and do they ever accidentally leave the range?

They still use it?

For war games?

I hope they don't train near any nuclear residue. 

I would love to go to the trinity sight

oh, is that what it is? Trinity site?

I thought it was a currently used missile site. 

It was a land based explosion, not dropped. mounted in a tower. was the first tested plutonium bomb. This is the type of bomb that requires incredible accuracy. It was amazing, it is far more difficult to produce and successfully detonate than a uranium based bomb. Just fantastic.....

I suppose, do you know that the united states has detonated around 1200 nuclear device, This compares to 800 for the rest of the world combined. But that is a total of 2000 bombs. I was fine with the first couple of tests to prove the point ( accept for the hiroshima and nagasaki, that was a war crime) but most people don't know how many where let off. of that about 500 were on its own soil, the other 700 were on atolls and literally destroyed entire ecosystems. 

I'm 100% sure.

its like Richard Dawkins said...never say never but on his scale of 1-7 positive theist to total atheist, i rate myself a 6. as does Dawkins rate himself.

"Based on what evidence?"

-His last several replies.

That's what any statistician would call a sampling error. Logic fail.

OK, maybe you can take out the garbage, but here on this thread, what I have noticed from you trolling me, is that you have no substance, only insults.


Support Atheist Nexus

Supporting Membership

Nexus on Social Media:

© 2015   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service