I wanted to put this question out there to see how strongly everyone feels on this subject. Being that most of us trust in scientific fact and reasoning, I was wondering if everyone is absolutely, undeniably, 100% sure that a god doesn't exist.  I personally take into account that there is no proof of any cosmic creator so therefore I am about 99.9999% sure that there is no god. However we all agree that science is an ever evolving field and I don't think that there will ever be any proof to support the existence of a supreme being, but I can't be 100% sure until there is concrete proof against one. I would like to know what all of your thoughts on this.  

Views: 17833

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

So then, the Earth is sometimes flat and sometimes, humans can shit unicorns.

LOL. I just watched two programs about multiverses. Some speculate that every possibility, no matter how unlikely, is real in some multiverse somewhere, because they are infinite. It's disturbing to think there might be a place where the equivalent of angels are real. I don't worry about gods, because logically contradictory stuff isn't just very improbable, that's impossible.

The unicorns would have to be rather small. You bet Prep H is big business there.

One multiverse is fine, but everything in existence is still one everything. And no matter what the shape of the extra dimensions and the subsequent behavior of the vibrating strings, magic cannot happen, I know. For magic, gods, angels and miracles would no longer be such, the moment they have any specific identity or manifestation in reality. The people that speculate about any possibility, I'm sure, well, I hope, only refer to the possible, not the impossible. There is not another universe within the multiverse that, say, houseplants can start a car with a peanut butter and jelly sandwich or that 2+2=51.7. Impossible is impossible, wherever you are. And who says that shitting unicorns wouldn't be a pleasant experience? It might feel like eating rainbows, which can make you taller if you do it on a Thursday morning.

I shit a unicorn once.  Boy did it hurt.  I am not sure it was a unicorn, but it felt like one.

Doubt is healthy.  Fundies have no doubt.  Or do they?

If I am more than 99.99999999% sure that there is no god, what is the point of discussing it?  (I am 99.99% sure.)  I don't have to convince myself or convert anybody.  Lets argue if water is wet, if the sun is hot, or ice is cold.    The better discussion is how can any educated person think otherwise?  Why does 56% of American don't believe in evolution?

You did not shit a unicorn. Constipation or anal fissures or hemorrhoids don't count as unicorns. Doubt that 2+2=4 is not healthy. I care not, nor do I think it germaine, that fundies are certain of their faith, which is retarded. Many many people believe in god and not evolution, despite their "education", which in the matters of reason and logic, is quite deficient. The point is that if you are only 99.999999999% sure, that means you think that the possibility of the impossible can happen is greater than 0, which in effect means that you think anything is actually possible, which is about as smart as creation 6000 years ago. The statement that anything is possible is false.

"Doubt is healthy" is the first principle of atheism and of science. It can not be used to have a second doubt on your first one!


Atheism has principles? I always thought atheism had nothing to offer the world, and I still think this way. And I will probably continue to think this way.


And the first principles of science have to do with observations. After that, it's all about proving what you think about your observations.


"Doubt is healthy". That sounds more of a sceptics philosophy.



Leveni, I am surprised and disappointed to read you question if atheists have principles, yet that is the first question I get from believers.  I am an honest person, reliable, dependable, responsible, generous, compassionate, loving and I could go on listing a whole bunch of other attributes but the issue is that I am a human being with the ability to think, reason, observe, compare and contrast.  I live pro-socially because it is inside me.  I would no more cheat you than spit on you.  My decency does not come from some external power but from my internal care and love and compassion.  

Atheists have nothing to offer the world?  Well, I was a teacher and a very good one.  I am a mother and do a very good job.  I was a wife and managed very well even as my husband broke the bones of our children, bruised and battered them.  Seeking help from my ministers, church members and church leaders, I was given what I call the "Passive Gospel":  yield, pray, obey, submit, do not rile him, love him to the lord, sacrifice myself daily in imitation of the crucified christ and rejoice in my crucifixion.  Not very healthy advice coming from my religious family and community.  

Do all religious people commit domestic violence?  No!  Do any atheists commit domestic violence?  Yes!  Religious and non-religious commit physical, emotional, and spiritual assaults on people who love them.  Is that the test? 

When I observe a child being mistreated in the grocery store is it loving and compassionate to turn away and do nothing?  

When I observe a woman with bruises on her face and body is it loving and compassionate to not recognize the signs?

When I observe a man being brow-beaten by his wife and I obligated to remain silent?  

From where does your motivation for pro-social living come?  



Where have I written atheists don't have principles?


Where have I written atheists have nothing to offer the world?


Excuse me, Leveni!  You wrote, 

"Atheism has principles? I always thought atheism had nothing to offer the world, and I still think this way. And I will probably continue to think this way."

Hi Joan,

How are things?


Yep, "Atheism has principles? I always thought atheism had nothing to offer the world, and I still think this way. And I will probably continue to think this way." is what I said.



I never said:'atheists don't have principles?'


I never said:'atheists have nothing to offer the world??'


Atheism is the absence of a belief in God. But as far as principles go, atheism has nothing to offer. But if you think atheism does have principles please share them with me and explain how it is that the principles in your explanation are a part of atheism.


Leveni, if atheism consists of the single principle that gods do not exist, it still offers a tremendous boon to society. This single realization frees the mind from generations of useless strictures which have drastically hamstrung society. The Christian Dark Ages (roughly 1,000 CE to 1,500 CE) and Muslim Dark Ages (roughly 1,500 CE to now) can be blamed entirely on the mind-numbing effects of belief in the supernatural. Sure, this intersected with cultural and political effects, but the basic idea is that God is all we need concern ourselves with. This is a powerfully harmful meme. If eroding this meme is all that atheism offers, then that is one of the most important principles in history, and not something to overlook, as you appear to have done.


Further, as a principle, the absence of god-belief leads almost directly to other important principles, such as the practical, socially-driven nature of morality, the importance of living well in this life, rather than postponing one's happiness to an afterlife paradise which isn't there, the elimination of the fear of a hell which isn't there, and the embrace of actual reality and personal responsibility, since there isn't anything else to be concerned with.


You are seriously shortchanging atheism if you think it has nothing to offer, and it's a little weird that you'd bother hanging out on an atheist website if you truly believe that.



Update Your Membership :




Nexus on Social Media:


© 2016   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service