Well, it's not really suprising, is it? If it had been Bush instead of Obama they'd believe it lickety-split. Of course, then the liberals would be murmuring conspiracy theories instead, but if that were the case they'd almost be legit, since Bush was such a dishonest man.
It's pretty obvious why Osama was buried at sea: His burial in the West would have been a contentious issue to Muslims in the Middle East who would have demanded the return of his body. And to Americans, his grave would have become a place to desecrate. If buried in the Middle East, his grave would have become a shrine. It may very well be that his body is still in custody for some reason or other, but if that is the case, they'd have to say he was buried at sea anyhow for the reasons I just stated.
The man was just too polarizing to be buried anywhere on land.
look at this logicaly.
we do NOT have a bodie. good move! dont let them have the body and dont let them have a grave site.
any grave site on land for this asshole would result in a second "mecca" for the assholes to follow.
We have the sworn word of NAVY seals, who are trusted, sworn by oath and trained to do there job for the country.
we have unsubstatiated stories of the body NOT being that of bin laden by crack pots that have no training, have NO real first hand info and generaly cant read past the 4th grade level.
WHO YOU GONA BLEIV'!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!