Romney's tax plan has never been spelled out completely. It starts with a 20% across the board cut for everyone. That is where Obama gets the $5 trillion revenue loss figure, but Romney says he will make the cuts revenue neutral by eliminating deductions, refusing to specify which.

That's where the problem lies. Some taxpayers have a lot of deductions and might see an increase in their taxes, while others with few deductions would get a large tax cut. It might average out, but you don't want to be on the wrong side of that averaging.

What's missing from the discussion is that any tax plan will have to be passed by Congress. Many deductions are aimed at certain businesses. The housing and real estate lobbies will argue fiercely against eliminating the deduction for home mortgage interest and that is a big one—for many taxpayers, their largest deduction. State and local income taxes are a big deduction in some states, but not in others. Where income tax is high the Congressional delegations from those states will vote against eliminating the deduction and Romney may not get the support of his party on that one.

Voters may well go for the 20% income tax cut, not realizing what they could lose in deductions. As long as Romney refuses to tell, he may win votes. The clincher is that the Tax Policy Center claims that no combination of eliminated deductions adds up to enough to allow a 20% tax cut. Analysts who disagree rely on a large increase in economic growth to offset the shortfall.

Views: 230

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Any detailed discussion of taxes soon surpasses the capacity of most. Our mind-boggling tax code is extraordinarily complex and full of favors to various segments. Here is a discussion of what the numbers mean, but it is still not made entirely clear because it does not discuss cuts to other taxes that Romney proposes.

http://taxvox.taxpolicycenter.org/2012/10/17/how-much-revenue-would...

And unfortunately many people are stupid Jonathan.

That's true, there are legions of morons in the country who vote; however, when the nitty gritty of tax policy gets into the discussion even the intelligent citizen's eyes glaze over.  Mitten's economic plan is bullshit and he knows it - if he doesn't then his "business cred" is a joke.  But then, Mittens has switched hats so many times who knows what he actually means or thinks?

You mean we aren't now?

RSS

© 2015   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service