Daniel Dennett   What Should Replace Religions

Food for thought:  this isn't the most riveting presentation but it provides a kickoff point for a topic we all need to consider:  where should the unbelievers focus their movement?We've been kicking this around in our tiny local group.  We know we must take 'baby steps' due to our size, but we also know we need a direction.

Views: 250

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Should is not a suitable helping verb. Was / is / will may be better. Religions replaced religions. Religions replace religions. And it seems religions will replace religions. Christianity had had 3 main subsets. Islam had had 2 main subsets. There are atheist Hinduisms and there are theist Hinduisms. Trinity says 3 god(let)s in a 1 godded religion. All these are replacements. Some scientists tried a science religion (not scientology, but mechanic determinism), but they failed. Human kind without religion is a post-human species.

RSS

Support Atheist Nexus

Supporting Membership

Nexus on Social Media:

Latest Activity

Qiana-Maieev replied to James Yount's discussion Unique and Interesting Instruments in the group Music Lovers
1 hour ago
Qiana-Maieev commented on Loren Miller's blog post Is Nothing Sacred?
1 hour ago
Qiana-Maieev liked Loren Miller's blog post Is Nothing Sacred?
1 hour ago
Joan Denoo commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's photo
1 hour ago
Joan Denoo liked Ruth Anthony-Gardner's photo
2 hours ago
Loren Miller posted a status
"“Sometimes people don't want to hear the truth because they don't want their illusions destroyed.” ― Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche"
2 hours ago
Loren Miller commented on Loren Miller's blog post Is Nothing Sacred?
3 hours ago
Bertold Brautigan commented on Loren Miller's blog post Is Nothing Sacred?
3 hours ago

© 2016   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service