Who else wants to describe religion as a mental disorder?

For awhile I have thought that:

Religions are mental syndromes consisting of bizarre, typically but not always inherited, maladaptive, abusive, time-wasting obsessions and compulsions, which people feel compelled to obsessive over, believe in, do, learn about, teach to other people, and spend money on, in order to avoid feeling too guilty about themselves due to the possibility of not obsessing over, doing, believing in, learning about, teaching to other people, and spending money on, the things they were taught that they have to obsess over, believe in, practice, learn about, teach to other people, and spend money on.

I can explain this in more detail. I thought of this, so it is copyrighted to me.

Another thing: religions start in the brains of people who are schizophrenic, extremely obsessive-compulsive, and have good charismatic leadership qualities. I got this idea from Robert Spolsky, except that he calls these people schizotypel, which he uses to mean only partially schizophrenic, but for now I will call them schizophrenic.

Views: 472

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Sad that genocide is socially acceptable.

It's probably the other way around.

Probably schizophrenic tendencies result from human characteristics that evolved to accommodate religious belief.  

Almost all cultures have had a religion.  The tendency to be religious probably evolved because it was adaptive - it provided group cohesion, enabled a group of people to survive better. 

Visionary tendencies, voices from the sky etc. could create the legal system of a society.  As in the Ten Commandments. 

I like Robert Spolsky's observations. Religions start in the brains of mentally disturbed individuals who have severe anxiety problems or are obsessive-compulsive. And then the purpose of the compulsive behaviors (rituals) is to make the person "feel better"' sort of like stymying, similar to tics. But people usually hate to not be normal, for the same genetic or evolutionary reasons why animals live and travel in groups. And when one animal goes outside the heard, it is likely to get eaten or maybe other members of the heard will kill it. So the purpose of teaching religions was to spread a person's anxiety or mental illness around so that the whole community would do the mentally ill person's religion, so that the mentally ill person would feel normal while still getting to do his system of obsessions and compulsions which is the religion this one person has invented.

The tendency to be religious evolved in human society.  Probably because it was useful for the survival of a group. 

I don't agree that religion can be useful for the survival of a group. Maybe religion is useful to the survival of a group if one group is going to kill a second group unless the second group converts to the first group's religion? Religion is completely maladaptive and there is not one speck of good in it. Religion does not evolve in society. It evolves in a few bat sh-t crazy individuals, who then brainwash other people into their religion.



Update Your Membership :




Nexus on Social Media:


© 2017   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service