Why Atheists Can't Be Republicans

CJ Werleman's just published  Atheists Can't Be Republicans.

That atheists are secularists is one reason why atheists can’t be member of today’s Republican Party.

The Grand Old Party (GOP) is ... a theocratic sponsor,...

Atheists can’t be Republicans because the economic and social policies of the Republican Party have been proven abjectly false and dangerous. Much in the same way religion is false and dangerous. In other words, atheists who cling onto modern U.S. conservative ideology are hanging onto ideas that have either been proven mythical at worse or remain unproven at best. If atheists applied the same litmus test to their political ideology as they do to theology, then clearly an atheist cannot be a Republican.

Atheists are the fastest growing minority in the country. We now have the critical mass to shape elections and policy. Were atheists able to establish a monolithic political demographic, one that is based on proven economic and social policies, then our potential political power would translate into saving this country from the clutches of the American Taliban and Wall Street.

On the other hand, the author also says,

... I have come in contact with as many idiot atheists as I have with idiot Christians, Jews, and Muslims.

Views: 1760

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

If you want the maximum number of manufacturing jobs in the u.s, eliminate the minimum wage and reduce or eliminate taxes on manufacturers, eliminate health insurance laws, and have as few regulations as possible. Otherwise is is likely to be most cost effective to have so many goods manufactured overseas.

Profit is not evil and Money is not evil. You do work, you earn money, you trade your money for goods and services you want and need. Business owner's motive for operating a business is to earn a boatload of money and the more the government steals from business owners in the form of taxes and regulations, the less motive they have to operate their businesses and the less ability they have to employ people and the less their businesses can produce and the higher the prices for consumers is. It makes no sense to inhibit employer's ability to make enough profit while at the same demanding that they have to provide so many jobs and furthermore pay a minimum wage and provide so many benefits and still charge a low enough price to consumers.

Otherwise it is likely to be most cost effective to have so many goods manufactured overseas.

You're right, Michael; in some Asian countries there is no minimum wage, few or no taxes on manufacturers, no health insurance laws, and few or no regulations.

Before America's brief progressive era in the late 1800s and early 1900s, the near slave-labor conditions you favor existed here. Working people in those Asian nations will fight for and win what working people in America fought for and won.

You seem unaware that America's predatory capitalism is now slowly but inevitably effecting its demise here.

You also seem unaware that political democracy has in some countries replaced, and in other countries is replacing, political tyranny.

Similarly, economic democracy has in some countries replaced, and in other countries is replacing, economic tyranny.

Michael, you seem unaware of so much, including that the economic Libertarianism you admire occupies history's trash can.

You nailed it Tom!
Are you part of a union, do you earn only minimum wage and would you earn more or less money if all these laws and regulations suddenly went away?

Michael, I'm a combat veteran of one of America's wars. I'm also retired from the computer industry.

Have you done anything to earn the freedoms you have -- the freedoms you would deny others?

Yes I have. I make library catalog records for a living and then my company spends money on me and then I get whatever is left after the government steels what you are happy they steel, and then somehow I still don't need to steel from people in the form of food stamps or whatever other government assistance there is.

Tom, as usual, you state it clearly, concretely, precisely and wisely. 

Michael, If you want manufacturing jobs in the U.S. and eliminate minimum wage, and reduce or eliminate taxes on manufacturers, and eliminate health insurance laws, and have as few regulations as possible, you will have a country of exploited workers who do not share in the profits from producing the goods and services that U.S. consumers want.

You will have a working class who is unable to afford the products they make.

Unsafe working conditions put workers at unnecessary risks, such as the The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire in New York City, March 25, 1911.

Hiring children because they are cheaper or because they are small would result in Child Labor conditions before 1916 and child coal miners.

Because there are more workers than there are jobs, wages are forced down. Legislation is necessary to insure a living wage for workers, especially when workers produce great profits for owners. With production jobs going to parts of the world with excess workers, U.S. owners can hire workers for far less money than U.S. workers receive, with fewer safety regulations, fewer benefits, and fewer health regulations on the products. 

If profits are taxed at a lower rate than payroll taxes, owners of profitable businesses do not share in the taxes necessary to maintain the national defense, investments in infrastructure, on education, in addition to interest on the debt. Payroll taxes as a whole are regressive:  they collect a higher percentage of total earnings from lower-income workers than higher-income ones.

The sources of federal tax revenue are individual income taxes, payroll taxes, and corporate income taxes; other sources of tax revenue include excise taxes, the estate tax, and other taxes and fees. Wealth is much easier to hide than wages, and capital is taxed at a lower rate than labor

Of course, profit and money are not evil! What is evil, unjust, unfair, immoral, corrupt, and destructive is the role of money in buying access to political power. A republic requires representatives who represent the people. What USA has become is a republic with representatives who represent money interests. 

Correct Joan.
As for stealing, people who listen to news, as opposed to Faux news, know that corporations steal more than the poor could ever concieve of. Corporate welfare is stealing billions. The poor couldn't begin to steal at the rate of the rich.

Joan, thanks for the pics. The second one stirs a question: do you think it best if taxes are hidden?

I ask, not because I have any sympathy for conservative positions, but because taxes on business income are added to the retail prices of the goods and services these businesses, including corporations, sell.

I agree with Michael Moore that corporations are sociopaths and the law should treat them as such, but customers of businesses big and small, incorporated or not, pay these taxes at the cash register. Few know they are doing so.

Taxes are necessary; I don't want them hidden from the people who pay them.

What are you saying Tom?   That businesses should not be taxed?..If they were not  the  burden of  taxes  would  be put on  every  working American  to make up the difference...Sure customers  probably  pay  higher  prices  when  taxes  go up on a business  but  that is  the  price  of doing business....That  is  how it works....Same  with  minimum  wage...when it goes up so do  prices....that is how  a capitalist  system  works...We may not  like it  but  we end up paying  up  and  life goes on....By the way  taxes  do  help us all  in many  ways  so it is not meant  to punish us.....When the Tea party  says  Cut  taxes....It  sounds  great  but  then  services  get  cut and our  way  of life  is  effected because  nothing  gets  done.....We just  have to suck it up  and  pay it...



Update Your Membership :




Nexus on Social Media:


© 2016   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service