Being an atheist doesn't mean you worship "satan" or kill babies. So why does the word that merely means a lack in belief in an, in my opinion absurd, God make people cringe as it does? 

Views: 3176

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

It challenges their power.  Religion empowers religious leaders to hold power over their congregations.  This relationship allows these leaders to create a society that most benefits religions (through laws, money supply, and war).  When you question the existence of God, you threaten this power.

This power takes many forms, but it is mostly about money. Just because religious leaders say they don't care about money please don't believe that.  If that were true... then why is the Catholic Church the second largest land owner in the WORLD?!?! Why do the Masons control the world banking system?(the Masons require a belief in God). Why are the richest oil companies in the world owned by "conservative" Muslims? I try to avoid Jewish stereotypes, but they have long been associated banking. Why do Mormons pay 10% of their gross income as tithing (gross is not the "Take-Home-Pay", it is the amount prior to all of the deductions in your paycheck for FICA, etc.)

Maybe because people who see their god as the entire basis for morality can't imagine how we're not heartless, amoral beasts.

Some relevant satire, delivered absolutely deadpan by Edward Current: "What if God disappeared?"

indeed. seems to be a clik'd light switch from mind'control put in place by Koch bros. and the like imho

imho again. it's the 'freedom' of thought thing that scares the assholes the most. . . irony being the land of the free n all. peace

This is really a very good question.  I've noticed, for some reason religious people have more of an aversion to Atheists than any other "religious" (Yes, I know calling Atheism a religion is like calling bald a hair color) group.  I've had conversations with very devout Christians who think Hindus, Jews, Mormons, Catholics, Muslims, you name it are all going to Hell because they don't believe a certain version of Mythology.  But there is always a special place in Hell reserved for Atheists.  When asked, these Christians will say "of course there are no multi-armed Hindu deities floating around or that the Pope is really Satan".  When really pushed they will admit that believing in something even something they don't believe in is much better than an Atheist who believes in nothing.  

The logic seems to be you need to believe in something to comfort you when things get tough and give you a reason to behave well in an orderly society.  I think the concept that their deities are just imaginary is very threatening to their sense of worth and self.  It's much easier to argue that my imaginary friend is better than yours but exposing them to the fact that the emperor really has no cloths blows their minds.                 

Here's a joke: 

What did the brown hamster say to the white hamster? 

You're not from around here, are you?

Atheist gets the negative connotation because it is the diametric opposite of the belief systems of the majority.  We ain't from around here.  Atheists, quite plainly, eschew the notion that some things just cannot be explained without magic - which means we have to either think harder, or worse still, say "I don't know".  Something the egos of most cannot even begin to do. 

Well said. I believe a third possibility may be "I know there is no magic or God, but pretending there is is really beneficial to me so I will continue to play along."

That's along the lines of what I was going to say. If there's no price to be paid for doing so, most people will take the path of least resistance. It's hard standing up and saying the emperor has no clothes. Somebody might threaten to take away your corner office and the BMW along with it.

I think most people will sway with the wind. As long as the theists are the 800 pound gorilla, they will parrot the party line. I don't really think most people give it a whole lot of thought really as it's something they've been taught to believe.

Also, I think we'd be making a mistake in thinking our personal confrontations and arguments change the thinking of many believers. We're nothing but an annoyance to them. We hold no power over them so we're easy to dismiss. That's all part of the numbers game.

In time, if we continue to grow as a demographic, we'll be taken more seriously. Possibly too seriously for a time. Some of these people worry me.

It is war over resources.

I agree with what you are saying Ethan.

Hello, Brittany. Honestly, I believe this can be explained as a bias. Does socalist have to a negative connation? No. However, to many Americans, it does. This is true, I believe, with atheist.

When you believe that all of morality, the world, everything dervives from The Creator, and someone says that he or she does not believe in said god that understandably will cause resitentment. The bias is probably that we, the atheists, stand against everything that we ought to support in their eyes.

Manst capitalists assert with a moral zeal that capitalism is fundamental to a free society.Therefore, a capitalist may see a socalist as morally inferior.

Imagine instead of their country, the belief in God is fundamental to their eternal soul.There is probably no greater afront than saying "I do not believe in any god.".

To many, atheism is immoral.Why does agnostic not carry a similar bias? Agnostism is claiming to not know. Even many theists could safety say such.They can respect it more than denial.




Update Your Membership :



Nexus on Social Media:

© 2020   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: The Nexus Group.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service