It's not a matter of obsession at all. I remain convinced by anthropological and biological evidence that Homo sapiens is a species which throughout its long history had exhibited female choice of mate, the opposite of male choice of mate. If one can agree with that, then the corollary, is that men with small penises compensated, yes they may compensate by being more attentive lovers (tho in my experience that hasn't been the case), or by providing more riches, or by displaying more power. The point is that previous to religious cultures, males with larger equipment didn't need power structures. It's the males without power who designed power structures to dominate women. That may not be relevant to male/female relationship patterns in today's society, but it is entirely relevant to how women lost power. I would like to see a return to female choice of mate, along with an end to all religions, they go hand in hand. Then again, may not... or may indeed be relevant. From my travels, I have found that societies which have more sexual freedom in general have less female domination.
Female power and male domination are at the very core of the feminist debate, so in my opinion, it is totally relevant.
Conversely, it is why small breasted women are getting enhancements, to satisfy this modern male domination of the world. Were we women holding enough power, we wouldn't need such devices.
"The point is that previous to religious cultures, males with larger equipment didn't need power structures. It's the males without power who designed power structures to dominate women."
Do you have any evidence to support the thesis that men in power have smaller penises? Now, or at any time in history?
No, of course you don't. Its just another one of your silly pseudo-science whims.
I'm beginning to suspect that the human male evolved such a large penis in order for you to hang all your scientific phalacies on it.
Sorry, could not resist the pun.