I read some posting on Pharyngula recently that cited the Courtier's Reply, which is a much older Pharyngula posting. I don't have any quarrel with what P. Z. Myers says here, but there was one thing that bothered me (about my own sanity): if I agree that the Emperor has no clothes, why do I still spend time learning stuff about how finely those clothes are made?  More bluntly, if I still read about religions and I learn to tell them apart, while being an atheist, am I just nuts? Or what?


The better analogy with the Emperor's clothes is that there are a whole bunch of Emperors, and they all are naked, but they are claim to have the finest clothes.  The Courtier's Reply argument says we need to refocus the discussion on the fact that they're all naked.


Anyway, I am interested in hearing from other atheists who take the time to try and understand, say, the distinction between evangelical Christianity and fundamentalist Christianity.  (We're talking, after all, about Christians who don't bother to understand the distinction between agnosticism and atheism.) Should we do this? Are we just nuts?


There is a historical reason, for me, to be interested in this stuff: I was raised as a Methodist in a family that has a long history of religious wars. I already know a lot about the Bible so it does not seem to cost much to learn more.  But if it were not for that historical reason, I am not sure I would bother to learn stuff about various flavors of woo.

Views: 238

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I think like every other minority, we are going to have to get some support outside to achieve our goals.  First, we would have to have a clear set of goals.  LOL!  In order to reach our objectives, we have to be able to identify and recruit supporters outside our group, because we are simply too small to achieve much impact without some outside support.  It would be helpful to understand the different religions and sects within each to identify who might go along with us and who might not. 


Let's say one of our goals was to get rid of the tax exemption for ministers.  I'm sure not all ministers out there get a tax exemption.  This group who is not included in the tax exempt world of specialness might be a useful alley. 


Or if we wanted to get rid of creationism taught in the public schools.  Most Methodists, for example, think creationism is so much bunk and are supporters of evolution.  In fact, many liberal theists also support of evolution, anti faith healing, pro vaccination and many sound medical and scientific ideas.  They could also be useful allies. 


We're never going to get them on our side about any issue if we don't understand them.  They are not going to bother to learn to understand us.  They can bully their way through and get their way, but we are too small a group to do that. If we want to achieve political and social objectives, we are going to have to appeal to a wider audience.   So I agree with you.  We should learn about them and try to understand them. 

Interesting thread. Can only agree with your points. Learning about religions is good coz:
- its culturally and sociologically interesting. I need to know the fairy tale the majority of mankind believes. What makes it so powerful, and what makes it fragile. 
- its a political world after all, they compete and evolve, religions are also 'carried' by people and constituencies. 

In line with your example about xstian splits about creationism, and how it can serve the purpose of a healthy education system, example:
Islam is taking a scary shape. The best way to deal with that is not bombs only. Its about protecting the secular but above all the sufi system vs the salafist, wahabi doctrine. That makes you want to know more, if only to support the 'acceptable' theists vs the really fundamentalist ones.
Yes, I agree, and my more cynical reason is "divide and conquer": if the religious people are divided then it mutes some of their power.
As an Atheist I inadvertently learn about religions. Religions are nonsense. I am interested in Natural History and Dawinism. There are only so many hours in a day.
Religious ideology might be empty, but religion itself is still very real.

I actually have a hard time remembering all the details about the different religions, but it's interesting learning the strange stuff people believe, strange religions and other stuff like UFO's. It's all sort of the same intellectually.

I guess I would say that even though religious ideas might be empty, they are still extremely important in our world simply because so many take them as fact.
While I don't necessarily believe in the ideas of the religious, I do find it interesting because I like to see how the myths explain things before science existed. I also like comparing the differences and similarities between different religions (for instance, the Greeks also had a huge flood in their mythology), as well as finding things that generally aren't expressed in mainstream religion. I mean, I was pretty surprised when Jesus cursed that fig tree, or felt frustrated because it seemed that even his own disciples had problems empathizing with him sometimes, since in general, Jesus is perceived as this incredibly loving, above-ordinary-mortals fellow. Seeing him being portrayed as, well, human was a fascinating glimpse into how even things like that can change in religions over time.

Yes, agreed.


You will probably find that you don't have to learn very much before you know more than Christians know about each other. Frequently they don't even know a lot about their own sect. I grew up a Methodist and never knew that Methodism was "evangelical" -- it was certainly called that when it was new, in the 1800s. (In my church we had some people who were evangelicals and some who were not. My parents were not.)

Anyway, I am interested in hearing from other atheists who take the time to try and understand, say, the distinction between evangelical Christianity and fundamentalist Christianity

I'm currently reading Fundamentalisms Observed, which is an in-depth discussion of various forms of religious fundamentalism.  I'm trying to understand the history of religious movements and how they gain influence on society.

In answer to your questions; I dunno; you study whatever you're interested in.  If you like studying religion, or think it will be useful, then that's what you do.  Whether you should do it is up to your own interests and goals.  

If you're going to spend time debating religious issues, obviously you don't want to caught in a position of ignorance. 

the major religions of today are epically interesting; just the same as any other mythology. it has implications in all sciences and social sciences: psychology, biology, anthropology, physiology, sociology, etc. since they all are nonsense, what drives people do create new branches? new religions entirely? historically, why did this matter? why does it matter now? these are answers you could spend a lifetime studying and it is enjoyable. also imperative to arming yourself properly in debates.
Sure. I am interested in all the ways that the human mind can deceive itself. There is some famous quote from Richard Feynman, saying that science is what we do to keep from fooling ourselves.
Epicurus said sthing like that :'a man's most valuable virtue is the sense of what not to believe'

It's also just kind of neat-o. Gives you something else to learn.

When my parents took me to church (that stopped in 1986, I'm 38), "we" were Lutheran. Lutheranism is sort of Catholic Lite. You take Communion, and do a lot of stand up, sit down, kneel down, stand up, sit down, rah-rah-rah. The sermons are boring, the outfits are pretty, and the pipe organ is cool.


I have no idea how Lutherans really differ from Methodists, Presbyterians or Episcopals. Southern Baptists tend to be fire & brimstone, and the Pentecostals handle serpents and speak in tongues.


That's about as far as I've looked.




Update Your Membership :



Nexus on Social Media:

Latest Activity

Grinning Cat commented on Loren Miller's blog post ABC News Cops Out Again
1 hour ago
Grinning Cat commented on Loren Miller's blog post ABC News Cops Out Again
1 hour ago
Thomas Bear posted a song

 play UCP0efewXEcuCddMFLjlCDJQ

6 hours ago
Thomas Bear updated their profile
7 hours ago
junior mike replied to Athianarchist's discussion So What Made You First Start To Doubt?
7 hours ago
junior mike liked Athianarchist's discussion So What Made You First Start To Doubt?
7 hours ago
Tom Sarbeck replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Dark Energy in Question in the group Atheists who love Science!
9 hours ago
Profile IconRon, junior mike, Thomas Bear and 1 more joined Atheist Nexus
11 hours ago

© 2020   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: The Nexus Group.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service