Yes, and God Put Fossils Into the Earth to Fool the Darwinists

Views: 458

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I've been going to a 12 week viewing of Ken Ham's laughable "Foundations" DVD series at a Presbyterian church. I've seen the first 3 so far. Ugh, it's getting worse each time. So many misrepresentations of science and skepticism. It's jam packed with logical failures, just like the one in the sign.

We talk about this on my Facts Before Faith podcast (episode 5). I have a group on Atheist Nexus for the podcast. Feel free to listen and comment.

Funny!  The point is, the desert warlords who claimed to have divinely received the O.T. with its do this and don't do that, would not have known a dinosaur bone from an elephant's; they had no knowledge of paleontology period.  A discipline that would not even come along for three or four thousand years.  The jokester is merely betraying his or her ignorance, since the extinction of dinosaurs occurred 200 million years earlier.  Duh!

I've had some creationists tell me that the devil put the dinosaur bones there to deceive man.

Quite insane.

My ex-father-in-law believed that. Glad I can say ex.

This whole rhetorical method bothers me, and believers are the worst offenders. What is written on the sign is neither a question nor a statement. It's more of an accusation of conflict. People who are frustrated by English might ask, "Why do you drive on a parkway and park on a driveway?" People who ask this don't really care about the answer. They're just frustrated. These sentences are structured like questions, but they're really emotional outbursts.

A question that appears unanswerable may turn out to be quite easily solved, and any belief or thought patterns structured on the eternal lack of an answer are doomed for failure. This especially bothers me because it teaches children to be dumbfounded by questions instead of being fascinated by finding answers. My favorite: Which came first, the chicken or the egg? For me, the answer to this one is simple. No matter where in the chicken's evolutionary history you draw the distinction between "chicken" and "non-chicken ancestor of the chicken", at some point, a non-chicken, chicken-like creature laid a true chicken egg. It was the egg. It kills the joke, but that sort of thing is what a thirst for understanding often requires. There will always be deeper and deeper questions available to entertain us as they pop up.

RSS

line

Update Your Membership :

Membership

line

line

Nexus on Social Media:

line

Latest Activity

Loren Miller commented on Sky God's video
7 minutes ago
Chetana Raj liked Chetana Raj's profile
12 minutes ago
Daniel Wachenheim commented on Sky God's video
19 minutes ago
Sky God posted a video

Thoughts & Prayers App Commercial

The Thoughts & Prayers App: When you want people to draw attention to yourself with the least amount of effort ---------- Starring Danielle Spisso & Ryan Coil...
56 minutes ago
NazNoMore is now a member of Atheist Nexus
56 minutes ago
SILVIA SAINT-CLAIRE replied to Richard Haynes's discussion Brother Richard's speech: "Thank God America is a Secular Nation "
1 hour ago
Daniel Wachenheim commented on Daniel Wachenheim's group Godless in the garden
1 hour ago
Daniel Wachenheim commented on Joan Denoo's blog post Cary Part 5 Chicken stock
1 hour ago

© 2016   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service