The World's Largest Coalition of Nontheists and Nontheist Communities!
A group for people who enjoy the stars. :)
Latest Activity: Nov 5
Started by Donald L. Engel. Last reply by Kiljoy616 Mar 18.
Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by Gerald Payne Sep 17, 2015.
Started by Visvakarman Svetasvatara-Upanish Jun 17, 2015.
Regardless of the type of telescope you have, they are sometimes going to be in positions where the eyepiece is in an awkward position. I personally use a 10" Schmidt-Cassegrain on a fork mount and when looking directly overhead, the eyepiece is low although it's not as bad as a refractor scope would be. The short tube length of the SC helps keep the eyepiece within a relatively small area (The tube length is only around 15" long, but it has a focal length of 2500mm. However, by carefully adjusting the tripods leg length and using an observing chair, I usually don't have any problems. I also have an 8" Newtonian which is better than a refractor as far as eyepiece comfort is concerned. But since the eyepiece is at the front end of the scope instead of the back, there have been times I've had to use a step stool to reach the eyepiece and I'm 6' 2" tall. I've used about every telescope style and mount and for observation, I prefer the SC for mount to anything else.
I've got an equatorial 5 but as I say unless I'm gonna get easier access to the eyepiece it would be pointless swapping.
Gerald - the Newtonians have one big drawback: The eyepiece can end up in really backbreaking positions, depending on if you have an alt-az mount. If you have a GEQ mount you can normally rotate the scope in the mounting rings to get the ep in a good spot for you.
Is your refractor a doublet or a triplet? A 150mm refractor scope could command a fair price, depending on the optics configuration.
I own a 150 refractor. Due to back problems I can no longer comfortably access the eyepiece. I've been thinking of trading it in for a Newtonian. I wonder if anyone's got any experience with the comfort of a Newtonian. Their lining up for a swap but I don't want to end up in the same boat with a lesser scope.
Fantastic close up of comet 67P on ESA's flicker. No news about Philae sadly.
Beautiful Aurora light shows Patricia. I think the one like a rainbow is especially gorgeous. Yellow, green, purple, and blue.
I've never seen any, but would love to.
Patricia, these are beautiful computer wallpapers. They make me want to dance to their rhythms.
Gerald, I like your description of the challenges facing Philae. What an adventure that has been. When I was a kid camping out on the St. Joe River, in northern Idaho, the nights were so clear of dust and light pollution, we thought we could see forever.
I saw them the two years I lived on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska. They are beautiful and in some instances, we could read a newspaper or book by their brightness. The brightest I ever saw them was on a camping trip near Fairbanks. They take my breath away. I wonder what it was like to the ancient native population when they saw such sights?
Welcome toAtheist Nexus
Sign Upor Sign In
Or sign in with:
Update Your Membership :
Nexus on Social Media:
© 2016 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.
Report an Issue |
Terms of Service
Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.