Atheist Humor

This is the place to post that hilarious irreligious YouTube video, an irreverent, anti-religious cartoon, or other humorous bit of media. Posts that do not reflect an atheist/irreligious theme will be deleted. (Don't make me go Old Testament.)

Members: 2109
Latest Activity: on Sunday

Lewis Black: The Flintstones is not a documentary.

A slightly longer version of the clip that used to be here.

Discussion Forum

Jesus vs Jeezus

Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by Grinning Cat Aug 6. 21 Replies

Four More Cartoons

Started by Gary Canup. Last reply by Joseph P Sep 29, 2015. 7 Replies

The Power of Prayer, and Other Laughables

Started by Gary Canup. Last reply by The Flying Atheist Sep 27, 2015. 6 Replies

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of Atheist Humor to add comments!

Comment by Aiden on November 3, 2009 at 9:23am
Comment by Ivy on November 2, 2009 at 9:53pm
@B-Girl, whop wrote: "had to stop shortly after the doughnut was speaking in tongues."

*laughs!* The video *was* disgusting, but that phrase (and the image it conjures) makes for one hell of a non sequitur. :)
Comment by B-Girl on November 2, 2009 at 9:42pm
Ya' know, if it wasn't of such poor quality, I would almost think it was satire.
Comment by B-Girl on November 2, 2009 at 9:38pm
Ugh. That video nearly made me physically ill. I couldn't even watch the whole thing, had to stop shortly after the doughnut was speaking in tongues. I think Dunkin' Donuts should be suing them (I am not normally a big "pro-lawsuit person) for naming the doughnut "Duncan/Dunkin".
Comment by John Secular Smith on November 2, 2009 at 4:34pm
Praise the doughy Christ!
Comment by Louis Davout on November 2, 2009 at 4:28pm

Comment by Sergio on November 2, 2009 at 1:39pm
Yes Felix, it's perfectly clear now and I agree.
Comment by ɟǝןıx dǝʇɹɐɹ on November 2, 2009 at 1:31pm
all this myth should be understood through its connotation, not denotation, I agree but they are the ones who appeal to its denotation (they take it ad litteram) so I suppose they are really talking about a transaction: God has redeemed us by paying something. If god is playing this selling-buying thing, he agrees with the devil possessing us. If not, he would say "WTF devil, I don't need to buy them from you because I don't recognize you or noone being their owner". More, kids are not capable to understand easily metaphors anyway. Nevertheless, they could read between the lines "people are sold and bought at a divine level". Just a small meme. I wrote too much but do you understand what am I saying?
Comment by Sergio on November 2, 2009 at 11:57am
Well, Felix, I think that was a kind of metaphor. What really bothers me is that they endorse child indoctrination. I mean, putting in those poor children minds ideas like "Christ died in the cross," or "He shed a lot of blood for us," or "we belonged to the Devil" is revulsive, and doing it "playing innocent" under the umbrella of a child entertaining show is disgusting.
Comment by ɟǝןıx dǝʇɹɐɹ on November 2, 2009 at 11:30am
Maybe I have more patience this morning but I saw it all. Weird (or maybe not), they endorse the idea that is OK to buy people. If it is OK to buy people, maybe it is OK to possess people.

Members (2107)



Update Your Membership :




Nexus on Social Media:


© 2016   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service