Atheist Humor

This is the place to post that hilarious irreligious YouTube video, an irreverent, anti-religious cartoon, or other humorous bit of media. Posts that do not reflect an atheist/irreligious theme will be deleted. (Don't make me go Old Testament.)

Members: 2099
Latest Activity: on Monday

Lewis Black: The Flintstones is not a documentary.

A slightly longer version of the clip that used to be here.

Discussion Forum

Aron Ra: Professional Huckster?!?

Started by Loren Miller Jun 11, 2017. 0 Replies

FromThe Onion

Started by Lilac. Last reply by Gary S May 25, 2017. 7 Replies


Started by Compelledunbeliever Mar 10, 2017. 0 Replies

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of Atheist Humor to add comments!

Comment by David Sensei on August 14, 2010 at 6:53am
Cracked Carravaggio strikes again. Sorry I can't provide a larger image, you'll have to use a zoom function to read it, or drag it to your desktop. I'm still feeling my way with graphics applications. I'm on a roll with these so look out for more.
Comment by David Sensei on August 14, 2010 at 6:48am

Comment by Joseph P on August 14, 2010 at 2:56am
Heh, yup. I love the watchmaker argument. Anytime theists try to move beyond, "You've got to have faith," it always ends so badly for them.
Comment by Joseph P on August 14, 2010 at 2:48am
Your first paragraph is correct but is only part of the IC argument.

And yeah, that's typical of lots of Creationists. Not only do they not understand Evolution, but they don't even understand their own damned argument. :-D

And think through your second paragraph for a second. If IC didn't state that the system couldn't evolve, it wouldn't be much of an argument against Evolution, would it? Heh heh heh. Wow, you know some suck-ass Creationists.
Comment by Joseph P on August 14, 2010 at 2:43am
Heh, dude, rework your argument a bit. You just said that you have no problem with irreducible-complexity existing, and then you explained why it doesn't exist. Make up your mind. :-D

Irreducible-complexity states that there are biological systems that exist whose parts have no function on their own, outside of the system. That's where it's complete bullshit. The parts always have a function, outside of the system, and they just take on a new function within the system.

That's the bit you're missing. You seem to be under the impression that irreducible-complexity allows for the pieces of the system performing other functions outside of the system. It doesn't ... which is why it's bullshit. When they declare something irreducibly-complex, they're saying that none of it does anything without all of it.
Comment by Joseph P on August 14, 2010 at 2:27am
Heh, yeah. Reminds me of Behe's argument for irreducible-complexity of the bacterial flagellum. "Well, I haven't read anything that explains how it could have evolved, so it's impossible."

"Have you read any of these 28 papers on the subject?"

"Why would I do that?"
Comment by Joseph P on August 14, 2010 at 2:19am
Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. Really?

I mean ... really?
Comment by Joseph P on August 14, 2010 at 2:11am
How does the Cambrian Explosion get used by ID? I've never heard that one before. Are they saying that's where God intervened or something?

That's even more stupid that their other arguments, if that's the case.
Comment by Andrew Hall on August 13, 2010 at 8:50pm
My thoughts on the Ground Zero Mosque - it's funny!
Comment by Glenn Sogge on August 13, 2010 at 7:45pm
I didn't make this, just found it while surfing. I'm sure we could come up with improvements.

Members (2099)



Update Your Membership :




Nexus on Social Media:


© 2018   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service