Atheist Humor

This is the place to post that hilarious irreligious YouTube video, an irreverent, anti-religious cartoon, or other humorous bit of media. Posts that do not reflect an atheist/irreligious theme will be deleted. (Don't make me go Old Testament.)

Members: 2090
Latest Activity: 21 hours ago

Lewis Black: The Flintstones is not a documentary.

A slightly longer version of the clip that used to be here.

Discussion Forum

Aron Ra: Professional Huckster?!?

Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by Loren Miller Sep 18. 8 Replies

The Big Whoop Book

Started by Grinning Cat. Last reply by Bertold Brautigan Sep 5. 5 Replies

FromThe Onion

Started by Lilac. Last reply by Gary S May 25, 2017. 7 Replies

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of Atheist Humor to add comments!

Comment by David Sensei on August 15, 2010 at 12:34am

Comment by David Sensei on August 15, 2010 at 12:33am
Here he goes again. Abraham makes another attempt to do the bidding of those voices in his head.
Comment by Andrew Hall on August 14, 2010 at 12:17pm
Comment by Christopher on August 14, 2010 at 7:47am
hehehe Speaking of which...

Comment by Christopher on August 14, 2010 at 7:44am
Thanks, Mike! I was diggin' the Latin version. I have an all time favorite, so far, quote on the evolution "debate", LOL, which I got from a guy who used to frequent the GodIsAMyth chats on AOL back in the day.
"Geology shows that fossils are of different ages. Paleontology shows a fossil sequence, the list of species represented changes through time. Taxonomy shows biological relationships among
species. Evolution is the explanation that threads it all together. Creationism is the practice of squeezing one's eyes shut and wailing 'does not!'"

I still start chuckling, even after all these years, every time I read that one. It's still funny as hell
Comment by David Sensei on August 14, 2010 at 6:53am
Cracked Carravaggio strikes again. Sorry I can't provide a larger image, you'll have to use a zoom function to read it, or drag it to your desktop. I'm still feeling my way with graphics applications. I'm on a roll with these so look out for more.
Comment by David Sensei on August 14, 2010 at 6:48am

Comment by Joseph P on August 14, 2010 at 2:56am
Heh, yup. I love the watchmaker argument. Anytime theists try to move beyond, "You've got to have faith," it always ends so badly for them.
Comment by Joseph P on August 14, 2010 at 2:48am
Your first paragraph is correct but is only part of the IC argument.

And yeah, that's typical of lots of Creationists. Not only do they not understand Evolution, but they don't even understand their own damned argument. :-D

And think through your second paragraph for a second. If IC didn't state that the system couldn't evolve, it wouldn't be much of an argument against Evolution, would it? Heh heh heh. Wow, you know some suck-ass Creationists.
Comment by Joseph P on August 14, 2010 at 2:43am
Heh, dude, rework your argument a bit. You just said that you have no problem with irreducible-complexity existing, and then you explained why it doesn't exist. Make up your mind. :-D

Irreducible-complexity states that there are biological systems that exist whose parts have no function on their own, outside of the system. That's where it's complete bullshit. The parts always have a function, outside of the system, and they just take on a new function within the system.

That's the bit you're missing. You seem to be under the impression that irreducible-complexity allows for the pieces of the system performing other functions outside of the system. It doesn't ... which is why it's bullshit. When they declare something irreducibly-complex, they're saying that none of it does anything without all of it.

Members (2089)




Update Your Membership :



Nexus on Social Media:

© 2018   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: The Nexus Group.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service