Atheist Humor

This is the place to post that hilarious irreligious YouTube video, an irreverent, anti-religious cartoon, or other humorous bit of media. Posts that do not reflect an atheist/irreligious theme will be deleted. (Don't make me go Old Testament.)

Members: 2100
Latest Activity: on Sunday

Lewis Black: The Flintstones is not a documentary.

A slightly longer version of the clip that used to be here.

Discussion Forum

Aron Ra: Professional Huckster?!?

Started by Loren Miller Jun 11, 2017. 0 Replies

FromThe Onion

Started by Lilac. Last reply by Gary S May 25, 2017. 7 Replies


Started by Compelledunbeliever Mar 10, 2017. 0 Replies

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of Atheist Humor to add comments!

Comment by The Flying Atheist on June 25, 2016 at 10:33pm

Ha!  George Takei.  What a great guy.

Comment by Grinning Cat on June 25, 2016 at 10:22pm

Or as George Takei said, it was the French spelling, Adam and Yves.

Comment by Amit Malik on June 25, 2016 at 9:41pm

In the beginning there was Adam and Eve and Steve, who was the original supermodel, the pureblood.

Comment by Bertold Brautigan on June 25, 2016 at 5:13pm

Abandon all hype ye who enter here.

Comment by Grinning Cat on June 25, 2016 at 4:15pm

Concentric circles of hell, with flames, people, demons, pitchforks, etc. At the bottom, demon construction workers working, with a sign: COMING SOON - TRUMP CIRCLE

Comment by Grinning Cat on June 25, 2016 at 2:37pm

"...Who controls the weddings / So gays can't say 'I do'
Blame it on a book and a 2000-year-old Jew?

The Vatican / The Vatican can
The Vatican can 'cause it sticks its nose right in to make the world less good.

...Who's got all the money / With zero taxes due
Hidden in these buildings and a bank that's kept from view?...

...Who makes all the dying / Suffer till they're blue
Read their rites and watch them as they choke on their own spew?..."

From the "ha ha only serious" Australian Sex Party:

Comment by Joseph P on June 20, 2016 at 5:04pm


I've heard the exact opposite from Christians.  If all knowledge of all gods went away, the first people who rediscovered the concepts might perceive the one true, transcendent god in a distorted way, based upon their own biases.  You'd think that if a god of some sort was getting in touch with those people, it would do a better job of communicating, but whatever.

But eventually, belief would evolve back into the one true, trinitarian Christianity.  Because that's the one true religion that all ancient religions have given over to, as the truth became known, apparently.

I can only assume that these people have never been outside of the US.

I guess it might seem like a clever way to dismiss all of the tens of thousands of other gods there have been, while continuing to hold their own religion true, but to me, on the outside of their echo chamber, it just seems desperate.


It at least makes a bit more sense within the context of an assortment of polytheistic pantheons.  Some of the stories about the creation of the entire Earth by their one god can't be true, but most of the gods are fairly provincial and just watch over the people who worship them.  There's nothing that says that there couldn't be multiple, competing war gods.

Hell, for that matter, some creation myths don't involve a global act of creation.

Comment by Bertold Brautigan on June 20, 2016 at 12:24pm


The Ethiops say that their gods are flat-nosed and black,
While the Thracians say that theirs have blue eyes and red hair.
Yet if cattle or horses or lions had hands and could draw,
And could sculpt like men, then the horses would draw their gods
Like horses, and cattle like cattle; and each they would shape
Bodies of gods in the likeness, each kind, of their own.

Comment by Grinning Cat on June 20, 2016 at 9:07am

Who was it who observed that if you could wave a wand and magically, instantly eliminate all knowledge of the earth's religions, people wouldn't reinvent the same ones -- the probability is infinitesimal that you'd get Christianity again, for instance -- but if you magically, instantly eliminated all knowledge of science, we'd rediscover a very similar body of knowledge, because it simply does so well at explaining how the world works!

Comment by Joseph P on June 20, 2016 at 1:12am

The difference between science and religion, yes.  If we're discussing something real, the vast majority of those who study a phenomenon will eventually arrive at more or less a consensus.

In religion, as time goes on, the interpretation of the phenomenon diverges wildly.


Members (2098)




Update Your Membership :




Nexus on Social Media:


© 2018   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service