One of the reasons I posted the following (even though religion isn't mentioned) is that some of the 3rd party candidates truly do believe in the separation of church and state--something we used to be able to count on from the Democrats. Now they still say they believe in separation of church and state, but Obama wants to expand the faith-based initiatives. Something doesn't mesh there. Another reason for this post is that it has seemed that the vast majority of us who have a naturalistic worldview have bought into mainstream media's sell-job that there are only two parties. If any group of people should know better than to buy into what everyone else believes, it should be us.
Why Vote Third-Party?
Posted on January 7, 2008 by John Uebersax
Why Vote Third-party?
My goal here is to convince you to vote for a third-party candidate — ANY third-party candidate — in the 2008 presidential election.
The reasoning is simple:
First, it should be evident to all that the Democratic and Republican parties are 'in cahoots'. There's not much real difference between them. They distract public attention by arguing about superficial differences, obscuring the fact that they actually agree on nearly all the important things, like:
(a) the BIG GOVERNMENT model is the only option
(b) America needs a huge military budget
(c) war is not insane
(d) term limits are not practical
Then why not just vote third-party? Here's the reason people give: "If I vote for a third party, I just throw my vote away."
Let's dispel that myth once and for all. First, if one thing is plain, it's that you have thrown your vote away if you vote for the Democrat or Republican candidate. The two parties are basically the same, and regardless of which party is in power, things don't improve. Recall that it was both the Democrats and the Republicans who rushed into the Iraq war, waving the flag, without a plan.
The truth is, the Republicrat party has arranged so that we have a Democrat for one or two terms, then a Republican, and then back again. It's a sweet system where both parties win. Neither is out of power for very long.
Consider also how both parties together have succeeded in making you feel you have to vote against someone. In 2000, for example, you may not have liked Bush much, but felt you needed to vote against Al Gore, or vice versa. That, I propose, is precisely what the two parties want. They have, by picking the right issues, managed to completely polarize the American public into two camps, split almost 50/50. Further, they've set the tone of American politics as one of constant acrimony and argument. Far too much attention is spent criticizing the other camp, and not enough on presenting new, positive ideas. It's a divide and conquer strategy. By polarizing the American public, the Republicrat power coalition has kept people too busy fighting with each other to see what the real problem is. It's the old case of 'let's you and him fight'.
This makes each person think, "My vote is essential to prevent the other party from winning; I can't afford to vote for a third-party candidate, or someone with original ideas." But considering the dearth of good ideas among the current Republican and Democrat candidates, it's evident that, whichever wins, we'll be stuck with another bad president for at least another four years.
This November, then, you'll have two choices:
1. Vote for the Democrat or Republican candidate, in which case you truly will throw your vote away, or
2. Vote for a third party candidate.
In the second case, it's true your candidate will not likely win. But you haven't thrown your vote away. If enough people do this, then the Democrats and Republicans will get the message. By the time the next elections come around, they will be thinking about adopting some of the ideas from the third parties. Further, any vote for a third party encourages the founding of new third parties, with valuable new ideas.
The potential for positive change in America exists. What we must do is create a climate in which these ideas will come to the fore in public discussion, and find implementation as social policy. Third parties can meet this vital need.
Therefore, here are two suggestions for you to consider:
1. Investigate the current third party candidates. Read their platforms and identify any promising ideas they have. In just doing this you will have broken free from the mind-conditioning of the two-party system. You will be actively contributing to making American a true democracy. Then, just consider voting for the candidate whom you would like to be president, not worrying about the issue of 'throwing your vote away.'
2. Most of all — though this is really a separate issue — approach the election with a positive attitude. This shouldn't be about whom you dislike or disagree with. It should be about developing positive vision of the future. Pay particular attention to noticing how the big-party candidates (and their buddies, the news media) try to manipulate public consciousness by eliciting anger and hatred — and then don't oblige them.
Be the change you want see in the world!