This article is from the NY Times. enjoy!

Views: 16

Replies to This Discussion

There is a danger that this 4th paradigm in scientific method might lead to excessive empiricism. I am an undergraduate in computational biology in which we look at truck loads of experimental data. My professors always warn us to not go looking for patterns like the face of Jesus in the cheese sandwich or the Bible code.

Because such patterns exist in all random data. And given enough computing power we might be able mine these out.

Scientific method begins with hypothesis i.e. an educated guess based on the current facts. Radical empiricists begin their method of inquiry with data which leads to stuff like the Bible code.
I like this line: "Dr. Wing has argued that ideas like recursion, parallelism and abstraction taken from computer science will redefine modern science." other words, ideas that first come from cognitive psych THEN from computer science will redefine modern science.

I'm really not slamming the article, which is excellent, but I found that one sentiment pretty funny.



Support Atheist Nexus

Supporting Membership

Nexus on Social Media:

Latest Activity

Ruth Anthony-Gardner posted a photo
13 minutes ago
tom sarbeck replied to eric stone's discussion More words we atheists can use in our struggle with religion
19 minutes ago
Loren Miller commented on Roniel Vallejo's status
28 minutes ago
Roniel Vallejo updated their profile
1 hour ago
Roniel Vallejo posted a status
"Excited for David Silverman's lecture for his new book, _Fighting God: An Atheist Manifesto for a Religious World_!"
1 hour ago
Qiana-Maieev commented on James Yount's group Music Lovers
12 hours ago
Joan Denoo commented on Daniel W's group Godless in the garden
14 hours ago
Joan Denoo commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
17 hours ago

© 2016   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service