Atheists who love Science!

Information

Atheists who love Science!

A group for science enthusiasts of all types -- professionals, amateurs, students, anybody who loves science.

Members: 1568
Latest Activity: 3 hours ago

Whether you're a professional, a student, an amateur, an enthusiast, whatever! Lots of atheists love science. Might as well have a group for it!

Feel free to nerd out, link articles, talk about your favorite field of research, whatever!

The icon is from www.wearscience.com.


9/28/2008
I've been super busy with school this semester -- no time for Atheist Nexus, sadly!!
If anyone who's around here a lot wants me to toss them moderation privileges to run this group or anything, just send me (Sara) a message! Thanks!

11/14/2009
Removed ability to send mass messages to everyone in the group. At 1000+ members, that seems like asking for spam.

Offer still open if anyone active in the group wants moderation privileges, but it appears everything has been going smoothly with all kinds of great discussions without moderation. Fantastic! :)

Discussion Forum

Paul Stamets - Bioremediation with Fungi

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by tom sarbeck yesterday. 1 Reply

Aging Research Breakthrough

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Joan Denoo yesterday. 3 Replies

Metrology: The Science of Measurement

Started by Idaho Spud. Last reply by Plinius Jul 20. 13 Replies

time viewing

Started by jlaz. Last reply by jlaz May 13. 20 Replies

Corrupt Science

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Grinning Cat Apr 11. 8 Replies

Michelle Thaller on Science Denial

Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by Andrew Mar 18. 12 Replies

Data Analytics and the Disintegration of Public Knowledge

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Jan 19. 4 Replies

Peas learn by association

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Sean Murphy Jan 18. 1 Reply

Hyperkeystone Species

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Sean Murphy Jan 18. 2 Replies

Super-Silk

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Idaho Spud Oct 10, 2016. 1 Reply

Planetary Context of the Anthropocene

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Chris Oct 2, 2016. 1 Reply

3-D Printed Bone Repair

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Sep 28, 2016. 0 Replies

Cold Vaccine Progress

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Sep 28, 2016. 0 Replies

Publish-Or-Perish Guarantees Flawed Research

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Grinning Cat Sep 22, 2016. 1 Reply

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Atheists who love Science! to add comments!

Comment by Joan Denoo 3 hours ago

Gary S., I can't wait!

Comment by Gary S 4 hours ago

My admiration and learning of science has told me that the Andromeda Galaxy is going to collide with the Milky Way in less than 4 billion years.  It has also told me that our sun will go through the helium-burning process and turn into a red giant in approximately 5 billion years. So, Earth will become a part of a red giant!

Comment by Idaho Spud 8 hours ago

At the Fred Meyer store today, I saw $2 glasses made for watching the solar eclipse.  They claimed to be 100% safe. They were all cardboard except the lenses, and had no side, top, or bottom shields.  I suppose they will work because I looked at the sunlight streaming in the front of the store and saw nothing.

Comment by tom sarbeck 23 hours ago

Joan, Brian Cox's parade is much too grand to hide under a brolly and escape the rain.

We electric universe folk have some videos too. They have the advantage that evidence gives them.

To see a few, visit www.thunderbolts.info

Comment by Bertold Brautigan 23 hours ago

Ruth, the most pathetic and embarrassing  (not to mention frightening [We are so fucked.]) thing of all is the R science committee cartoon isn't exaggerating in the slightest.

Comment by Joan Denoo yesterday
Comment by Idaho Spud on July 15, 2017 at 2:32pm

That sounds like a good guess Sean.

Comment by Sean Murphy on July 14, 2017 at 10:52pm

I don't know, Wild guess, perhaps they realized that they could save money if they moved it faster (less turnaround time) and in the horizontal position they would be able to move it faster - significantly less wind resistance and no worries about it tipping over from inertia when it starts or stops either.

Whatever the reason, if any public discussion board would have the answer, this one should, so I look forward to finding out!

Comment by Idaho Spud on July 14, 2017 at 6:32am

Does anyone know why SpaceX rockets are moved to the launch site in a horizontal position, then raised to a vertical position, instead of the way NASA does it, which is to move the rocket to the site in a vertical position.

I've searched for an answer, but found none.

Comment by Lilac on July 9, 2017 at 11:53pm

Educated cat.

 

Members (1568)

 
 
 

line

Update Your Membership :

Membership

line

line

Nexus on Social Media:

line

© 2017   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service