Atheists who love Science!

Information

Atheists who love Science!

A group for science enthusiasts of all types -- professionals, amateurs, students, anybody who loves science.

Members: 1581
Latest Activity: on Monday

Whether you're a professional, a student, an amateur, an enthusiast, whatever! Lots of atheists love science. Might as well have a group for it!

Feel free to nerd out, link articles, talk about your favorite field of research, whatever!

The icon is from www.wearscience.com.


9/28/2008
I've been super busy with school this semester -- no time for Atheist Nexus, sadly!!
If anyone who's around here a lot wants me to toss them moderation privileges to run this group or anything, just send me (Sara) a message! Thanks!

11/14/2009
Removed ability to send mass messages to everyone in the group. At 1000+ members, that seems like asking for spam.

Offer still open if anyone active in the group wants moderation privileges, but it appears everything has been going smoothly with all kinds of great discussions without moderation. Fantastic! :)

Discussion Forum

Science Journals suffer large scale peer review fraud

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Clarence Dember Apr 17. 1 Reply

Common sense talk about climate change

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Michael Penn Apr 15. 2 Replies

Time goes both ways in the quantum world

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by tom sarbeck Apr 14. 1 Reply

Ebola Vaccine Very Promising

Started by Patricia. Last reply by Patricia Apr 10. 6 Replies

Wound Healing

Started by Patricia. Last reply by Joan Denoo Mar 14. 2 Replies

The Web is not the Net.

Started by Visvakarman Svetasvatara-Upanish. Last reply by Michael Penn Mar 14. 1 Reply

Science, information, and politics in the Anthropocene

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Mar 12. 3 Replies

Marburg and Ebola Viruses

Started by Patricia. Last reply by Patricia Mar 4. 2 Replies

Dog-human alliance edged out Neanderthals

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Michael Penn Mar 4. 1 Reply

Climate Change Deniers.

Started by Visvakarman Svetasvatara-Upanish. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Mar 4. 8 Replies

FDA hides fraud

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Feb 14. 4 Replies

Vulnerable to science denial

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Grinning Cat Feb 8. 1 Reply

Brain and Spinal Cord

Started by Patricia. Last reply by Joan Denoo Jan 18. 3 Replies

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Atheists who love Science! to add comments!

Comment by Secular School Teacher on December 29, 2013 at 7:21pm

How Archaeology Disproves the four foundational stories of the Bible
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/12/24/1265119/-How-Archaeology-D...

Comment by tom sarbeck on December 26, 2013 at 4:13am

Religious and political dogmas don't want us making our own meanings.

I started making mine in the late 1950s. Finding work I liked that paid well made the task vastly easier.

Krauss told of doing what everyone who wants to be free has to do.

Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on December 25, 2013 at 11:50am

Thanksk Loren, for the Lawrence Krauss video. I agree with much of it. However I see us as creating meaning in a more significant way then he does. As Sagan says, "We are a way for the cosmos to know itself."

Comment by Joan Denoo on December 25, 2013 at 11:27am

Loren, the reality, "we don't run the government, the government runs us" defines a condition of our own making. We submit to the dictates of uninformed, voters who pick uninformed representatives and then wonder why our government is so messed up. 

To think critically, using the best information available, without mythology or superstition, occurs on an individual basis. We are not victims of irrationality unless we remain silent in face of misguidedness. 

Comment by Joan Denoo on December 25, 2013 at 11:22am

Grinning Cat, human-shine, energy, unseen by the human eye, reveals natural processes through these photos. Like electro-magnetism, it exists, impacts our lives in ways we can't even imagine at this time. It may provide a tool to assist in finding malformation or neoplasm before symptoms appear.  


I had the PET/CT scan last week and was "radioactive" for 24 hours, or longer, who knows? The radiologist told me not to get within 10 feet of a pregnant or nursing woman during those 24 hours because energy emitted from me could cause damage to development of the unborn or newly born. I cancelled plans knowing I would be with a newly pregnant mother.  

Unrecognized energy at work. To a primitive culture, such energies may be rare. To an advanced culture, with exposures to all kinds of introduced products, such as rbST in milk or GMO in foods, cause one to ponder the long range impacts when longitudinal studies have not been done.  

The good news is, such radiation revealed no cancer cells remaining in me, from head to foot. Advancement in food technology may initiate problems that can be found by advancement in diagnostic technology. Win some, lose some. 

Comment by Joan Denoo on December 25, 2013 at 10:43am

Loren, this piece by Kraus offers insights needed, particularly on this day, Dec. 25. "We provide our own meaning"! To shed the strings of puppets, taking on the challenges of living in the question, life becomes rich, robust, and fun, means transformation beyond imagining. 

Comment by Loren Miller on December 25, 2013 at 7:48am

I just discovered this piece by Lawrence Krauss, adapted from one of his Big Think videos.  Worth your time, I think:

Comment by Grinning Cat on December 23, 2013 at 2:15pm

Happy HumanLight!

Here's an appropriate bit of weird science:

http://www.livescience.com/7799-strange-humans-glow-visible-light.html

Strange! Humans Glow in Visible Light

The human body literally glows, emitting a visible light in extremely small quantities at levels that rise and fall with the day [...] 1,000 times less intense than the levels to which our naked eyes are sensitive. In fact, virtually all living creatures emit very weak light, which is thought to be a byproduct of biochemical reactions involving free radicals.

(This visible light differs from the infrared radiation [...] that comes from body heat.)

Comment by tom sarbeck on December 18, 2013 at 3:15am

The situation Sagan described could have been predicted from the time President Reagan invited the fundamentalists into the Repub Party. No one counted them and they took over the Party. 

Comment by Loren Miller on December 16, 2013 at 7:28am

Here's a brilliant excerpt from a conversation between Charlie Rose and Carl Sagan.  I can't help but note that the words said here are as valid now as when the interview took place:

 

Members (1581)

 
 
 

Support Atheist Nexus

Supporting Membership

Nexus on Social Media:

© 2015   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service