Atheists who love Science!


Atheists who love Science!

A group for science enthusiasts of all types -- professionals, amateurs, students, anybody who loves science.

Members: 1578
Latest Activity: Nov 15

Whether you're a professional, a student, an amateur, an enthusiast, whatever! Lots of atheists love science. Might as well have a group for it!

Feel free to nerd out, link articles, talk about your favorite field of research, whatever!

The icon is from

I've been super busy with school this semester -- no time for Atheist Nexus, sadly!!
If anyone who's around here a lot wants me to toss them moderation privileges to run this group or anything, just send me (Sara) a message! Thanks!

Removed ability to send mass messages to everyone in the group. At 1000+ members, that seems like asking for spam.

Offer still open if anyone active in the group wants moderation privileges, but it appears everything has been going smoothly with all kinds of great discussions without moderation. Fantastic! :)

Discussion Forum

Diagnostic test for ALL viruses

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by philip_rhoades Nov 15. 5 Replies

Liquid-crystalline water

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Nov 4. 4 Replies

Stable light-based memory

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Oct 5. 0 Replies

Fascinating article on strange world ex BBC

Started by Christopher Cosgrove. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Sep 4. 3 Replies

Dirty Oil Beats Science in the US

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Sep 3. 0 Replies

"Science Isn't Broken"

Started by Grinning Cat. Last reply by tom sarbeck Aug 28. 10 Replies

Dog-human alliance edged out Neanderthals

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Gerald Payne Aug 27. 12 Replies

Not-amorphous glass

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Aug 20. 0 Replies

Science Journals suffer large scale peer review fraud

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Clarence Dember Apr 17. 1 Reply

Common sense talk about climate change

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Michael Penn Apr 15. 2 Replies

Time goes both ways in the quantum world

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by tom sarbeck Apr 14. 1 Reply

Ebola Vaccine Very Promising

Started by Patricia. Last reply by Patricia Apr 10. 6 Replies

Wound Healing

Started by Patricia. Last reply by Joan Denoo Mar 14. 2 Replies

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of Atheists who love Science! to add comments!

Comment by Bryon on August 17, 2010 at 11:19pm
wow...seriously? This was actually published? In an actual news paper? How embarrassing for the news paper...
Comment by Ken on August 11, 2010 at 10:00pm
I just finished 'Demon Haunted World' last month. Incredible book. I was surprised I had not stumbled upon it earlier.
Comment by Susan Stanko on August 11, 2010 at 12:16pm
Comment by Jo Jerome on August 4, 2010 at 8:54pm
Does the disappearance of time have anything to do with fucking magnets? Because it sounds like it could be related.
Comment by Susan Stanko on July 12, 2010 at 9:10am
Comment by Fabio on July 11, 2010 at 8:30pm
@Dallas: No, it just means spacetime will curve upon contact with mass, since it cannot permeate through it. That, however, is just speculation on my part. I only have a high-school knowledge of physics :)
@Mike: Well, that was just a guess on my part. Truth is, we still don't know exactly what makes up the spacetime fabric, so why mass distorts it is anybody's guess. :)
Comment by Fabio on July 11, 2010 at 8:05pm
Umh, the only two massless particles we know of are photons and gluons. Rather than being matter, they are carriers of different types of forces - electromagnetism and strong force respectively. Photons, however, do have a relativistic mass. Roughly put - and as I understand it, hence I might be wrong - photons acquire mass at relativistic speeds, which means they are affected by gravitation.

Space-time distortion causing mass, sounds weird to me. No, it is definitely mass that distorts spacetime. You can say that spacetime's inability to penetrate atomic nuclei might be the fundamental reason why spacetime is distorted upon contact with mass, but you still need said mass to produce a distortion.
Comment by Fabio on July 11, 2010 at 7:43pm
Rather than being a property of mass I suppose it's an intrinsic property of the spacetime fabric. We don't really know what spacetime itself is made of, but whatever it is made of, it probably cannot penetrate atomic nuclei, hence bending under their mass. That's just my two cents, of course :)
Comment by Susan Stanko on July 11, 2010 at 7:26pm
Looks like a rocket to me.
Comment by Fabio on July 11, 2010 at 7:20pm
The problem with that representation of relativistic gravity is that the sphere used to simulate a mass in space-time is itself subject to the gravitational pull of Earth. In reality - in Relativity models, at least - the very presence of mass distorts space-time. It is not mass weighing down on space-time, because there is no up and down in space.

Members (1577)


© 2015   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service