Chariots of Iron


Chariots of Iron

"And the LORD was with Judah; and he drave out the inhabitants of the mountain; but could not drive out the inhabitants of the valley, because they had chariots of iron." -- Judges 1:19

Location: United States
Members: 677
Latest Activity: Jul 9, 2015

Chariots of Iron PodCast Information

Subscribe: Zune Link | iTunes Link | MP3 Feed | OGG Feed
Don't forget to visit us on Facebook, or you can contact us directly at

Discussion Forum

The future of the Chariots of Iron

Started by Lamar. Last reply by matt warren Nov 6, 2012. 8 Replies

No Wikipedia Page?!

Started by Andrew Lindsey. Last reply by Eli Feb 7, 2011. 4 Replies

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of Chariots of Iron to add comments!

Comment by Eli on December 2, 2009 at 11:05am
Wow, just.... man, let me say he's started off with "Stupid", let's see just how far down the rabbit hole he goes.
Comment by Wes on December 1, 2009 at 11:55pm
Oh...oh left side is numb. Rick Warren finally gave me a rage stroke.
Comment by Wes on November 30, 2009 at 9:44pm
I don't know if you all are Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal fans or not, but this is a hilarious video concerning creationism. There's even a Ray Comfort reference!
Comment by John Secular Smith on November 29, 2009 at 10:47pm
There, I voted in the Podcast thingy, get off my back! =P
Comment by Wes on November 29, 2009 at 6:34pm
Currently listening to episode 36, wherein you discuss the court decision on that dumb fuckin' Homeland Security office here in Kentucky from earlier in the year.

While I always cringe whenever I hear my fair state maligned, I have to admit that describing Kentucky as "the gut that hangs over the Bible Belt" as pretty goddam accurate. Not to mention hilarious.
Comment by Wes on November 24, 2009 at 7:14pm
So, I just finished episode 14: Hate-Free Atheism. I have to admit that I am indeed a snarky douche and would love to play tit-for-tat games with those "God Speaks" billboards. If I had the money I'd put this up on the side of the highway in 30 foot high letters:

"Claim to speak for god? It's not your mouth you're talkin' out of."

Too much or too subtle?
Comment by Judith McLean on November 24, 2009 at 11:47am
One more point. Extended families -- relatives and in-laws -- used to be the social security and health care of early times. A marriage was a union planned for the security it brought the bride's or groom's family. I believe that's why arranged marriages were so important, and romantic marriages were excoriated.
Comment by Eli on November 24, 2009 at 10:52am
Allow me to place a lightly longer view on religious sexuality, it's true that "productive sex" was a goal of several religions, especially the middle eastern religions that have grown to so much prominence today. Taking a longer view than Jacqueline, there is not so much the question of the creation of a lower working class, but of survival against a hostile environment, the history of that region is ridden with strife. One might think that this might lead to more promiscuous sexual behavior, but remember that while adults were an asset to these early tribes, children were a burden, so enforcing responsibility and the seeing through that these children grew up with the knowledge and skills to be productive to the tribe was of equal importance. These practices may have been kept to the dogmatic core because later rulers who adopted these religions found them useful but it is far from the original intent. One must take the evolutionary and historical critical view of these dogmatic teachings for them to make some level of sense.
Comment by Phil Weadick on November 24, 2009 at 9:03am
Guess I'll have to do it
Comment by Aiden on November 24, 2009 at 8:58am
At 5'7", I'd look like a giant ewok or a adolescent wookie.

Members (666)




Update Your Membership :




Nexus on Social Media:


© 2018   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service