Chariots of Iron


Chariots of Iron

"And the LORD was with Judah; and he drave out the inhabitants of the mountain; but could not drive out the inhabitants of the valley, because they had chariots of iron." -- Judges 1:19

Location: United States
Members: 677
Latest Activity: Jul 9, 2015

Chariots of Iron PodCast Information

Subscribe: Zune Link | iTunes Link | MP3 Feed | OGG Feed
Don't forget to visit us on Facebook, or you can contact us directly at

Discussion Forum

The future of the Chariots of Iron

Started by Lamar. Last reply by matt warren Nov 6, 2012. 8 Replies

No Wikipedia Page?!

Started by Andrew Lindsey. Last reply by Eli Feb 7, 2011. 4 Replies

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of Chariots of Iron to add comments!

Comment by moJoe on April 15, 2009 at 1:03am
I am the one that sounds like James Earl Jones.
Comment by Amanda (Freckles) on April 14, 2009 at 11:52am
Hi Eli (the other one)! Thanks!
Comment by Eli on April 14, 2009 at 11:49am
The southern accent would be Lamar, I'm the "other one".
Comment by Amanda (Freckles) on April 14, 2009 at 11:47am
I just started listening with episode 25. I have Joe's voice down from AtheistNews podcast. Who has the slightly southern accent Lamar or Eli?

I'm hooked - thanks!
Comment by Eli on March 31, 2009 at 2:06pm
I'll have to check that out, however, I would argue that "scientific" as defined by modern terms would not be the use of any disciplined methodology but that of the the scientific method (a specific methodology), thus Theology may be functional, methodological and rational, but that does not mean it is "scientific" (and I would debate that it is not rational as most theology I've encountered is based on a irrational foundation.

The example I use is you could say my attempt to invade Italy is "rational" based on my belief that I am Napoleon Bonaparte.
Comment by Pat on March 31, 2009 at 1:55pm
In the 1968 edition of the Encyclopaedia on the subject of Theology "Theology as a Science" article it states " Yet theology is fully entitled to be called "scientific" if by this one means that it has a prescribed function, a disciplined methodology and a rational structure.'

Can anyone explain what this is suppose to mean?
Comment by moJoe on February 26, 2009 at 5:00am
100! Kapow!
Comment by Eli on February 15, 2009 at 3:20pm
Well Joe's Italian too, so we're totally hopeless.

I don't know how I became the one to get pegged with "table bumping"... I may be upgrading the table in the studio soon, a thick tablecloth will be a good addition as well.
Comment by Jerry Ann on February 15, 2009 at 12:14pm
MoJoe - is the mic sitting on the table, or is the table just loud in the room? I wonder if it would help to put foam padding under the table to dampen the vibrations.

And Eli is Italian, if you restrict his hand movement he won't be able to speak at all.
Comment by Bryan Gahagan on February 15, 2009 at 3:07am
I've been listening to the Non-Prophets a lot longer, so I've got their personalities down better. What I like about your show, over theirs, is the focus topic in the second half of the show. Especially the biblically related topics. And the Muppet clip for the news. Keep up the funny. The Good Atheist is my third favorite, but they're Canadian. (Not that they're anything wrong with that) SGU is good too. The Nexus needs more outspoken women. Skepchicks speak up in podcast land.

Members (666)




Update Your Membership :




Nexus on Social Media:


Latest Activity

© 2018   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service