Members' games deserve their own folder.

Views: 13

Replies to This Discussion

I posted this last night to the 'Favorite Openings' folder, but it belongs here, White is the co-President of the Freedom from Religion Foundation. This game was played by e-mail,

White - Dan Barker
Black - George Kane
Sicilian Defense
Started October 1, 2001

1. e4 c5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. d4 cd4:
4. Nd4: d6

I don’t know if this move order is common today. I used to adopt it as an invitation to the Maroczy Bind, 5. c4. Then 5….Nf6; 6. Nc3 g6; 7. Be2 (7. f3) Nd4: 8. Qd4: Bg7, followed by 9…. O-O, 10….Be6, 11….Qa5, 12…..Rfc8, 13….a6 and 14….b5 is the Gurgenidze System, with which I felt comfortable.

5. Nc3 Nf6
6. Bc4 e6
7. Be3 Be7
8. Qe2 0-0
9. 0-0-0 …

The Velimirovic Attack.

9. … Qc7
10. Bb3 a6
11. g4 …

Obviously sharp. The idea, as you employed in the game, is g4-g5, Rhg1-g3-h3, Qh5 with a mating attack. A subtlety in move order is 11. Rg1. Then, if Black continues with this plan of development by continuing 11….Nd7, 12. Qh5! makes it hard for Black to organize his defense. For example, 12….Nc5 13. g4 Bd7 14. Rg3 followed by 15. Rh3. Black does not get to seal the Kingside as in the next note, while White’s Pawn remains on g4.

11. … Nd7
12. Rhg1 Nc5
13. g5 Bd7
14. f4 …

This is new to me. Playing from ancient memory, 14. Rg3 Rfc8 15. Qh5, g6 16. Qh6 Bf8 17. Qh4 Be7 stalls White’s attack, since if 18. Rh3 h5! But 14. f4 contains the threat of a lever with 15. f5. In order to avoid ceding the d5 square to White’s Knight, Black must dislodge it from c3.

14 … b5
15. Rg3 b4?

Natural, but premature. The difference from the last note is that White’s f2 - f4 and Black’s b7 – b5 have been played. A more reliable defense would be 15…Rfc8, as in that note, or at least 15….g6..

16. Qh5! …

On any other move, Black is clearly on top. If White withdraws his QN, Black forestalls the K-side attack with 16…g6, threatens the White e-Pawn, and is ready to roll White up on the Queenside with a6-a5-a4. After the text, White’s attack is unstoppable. Black’s only hope is to checkmate White first.

16. … bc3:
17. Rh3 h6
18. f5? …

If 18. gh6: g619. Rg1 Kh7 or 19. h7+ Kh8 20. Qh6 Bf6 and Black is secure. I was expecting 18. Rg1, threatening 19. f5 or 19. gh6: I was resigned to the not-especially satisfactory 18. … Be8, defending g6, to be able to answer 19. gh6: with 19. … g6. But 19. f5! is a tough nut to crack, with the threat of 20. f6.. I saw nothing better than 20. … Nd4: 21. Bd4: Nb3:+ 22. ab3: cb2:+ 23. Kb2: ef5: 24. ef5: f6 25. g6, when Black must find a mate before White gets in Bd4 - e3 – h6:

18. … Nd4:!

A simple, liquidating refutation of White’s 18th. If 19. Bd4: Bg5:+, or 19. Rd4: Nb3:+ 20. ab3: cb2:+ 21. Kb2: ef5: 22. gh6: g6 and wins. White therefore presses forward with his attack, ignoring the loss of material.

19. gh6: Ncb3:+
20. Kb1!? …

A last, desperate hope, to avoid giving Black any opportunity to organize his defense. Black must find an answer to the threat of 21. hg7:

20. … Nc2:!

Black breaks through first. 21. hg7: Na3+ 22. ba3: c2+ 23. Kb2 Bf6+ wins easily (but 23. … cd1:N+? 24. Kb1!). Also losing are 21. Kc2: bc2:+ 22. Kb2: Bf6+ 23. Kb1 Rfc8, as well as 21. ab3: Ne3: 22. bc3: (otherwise 22….c2+) 22…. Qc3:

If instead the routine 20…. Nd2+ 21. Bd2: cd2: 22. c3 Rfc8 21. hg7:, or 20. … cb2: 21. Bd4: Nd4: 22. Rd4: Rfc8 23. c3 Bf6: 24. e5 Be5: 25. gh7: Bg7: 26.Rg4 Kf8 27. Rg7: Be8 28. Qg5 wins

21. Bc5!? …

Resourceful to the end! The point I thought was that if 21. … Qc5: 22. ab3: Na3:+ 23. Ka2! Black’s initiative cannot falter for even a single move. But you mention 22. bc3:, which also looks difficult.

21. … Na3+!

Best because it is the most forceful. Every move is a check or a mate threat.

22. Resigns

After 22. ba3: c2+ 23. Kc2: Qc5:+ 24. Rc3 Qf2+ 25. Kb3: Rfb8+ 26. Kc4 Bb5+ 27. Kb4 a5 and mate next move.
No questions or comments? Anybody else have a game to discuss?




Update Your Membership :




Nexus on Social Media:


© 2018   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service