Information

Climate Concerns

The "CLIMATE CONCERNS" group is dedicated to discussion regarding the topic of the ever present and serious issue of changes to our climate due to the introduction into the atmosphere of human induced effects which prove harmful to the environment and which eventually may prove destructive to our planet. 

Members: 51
Latest Activity: 30 minutes ago

Reference/Research Sites

Discussion Forum

Framing Climate Destabilization

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Bertold Brautigan 30 minutes ago. 22 Replies

The words we use and the images they evoke shape public comprehension of Catastrophic Climate Destabilization's immanence. Here are a few terms from the past few days. It's a tiny…Continue

Tags: communicating climate science, Climate Destabilization, framing

Jet Stream Mayhem begins Tues

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on Sunday. 3 Replies

Siberian air…Continue

Tags: jet stream waves

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Climate Concerns to add comments!

Comment by April Niccolai on October 7, 2016 at 2:42pm

Its so refreshing to arrive on a site that has a climate change section like this one. Keep it up! Joined, and will be following.

Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on September 28, 2016 at 5:21pm

Jennifer Francis:

“We’re in this new world that’s much much warmer with much less sea ice and that’s changing the way the atmosphere behaves,” said Francis. “It’s an interesting time to be studying this, but the bad news is, we’re watching this planet fall apart.”

Jennifer Francis image

earthnullschool screen capture of jet stream over US 4:11PM 9/28/16

I found their story interesting to, Daniel. Because it was expected climate deniers would misconstrue their algorithm to "prove" CO2 wasn't responsible for climate change, their article was initially rejected.

Comment by Daniel Wachenheim on September 20, 2016 at 3:09pm
Here is a tale of two scientists who, in an effort to counter bias regarding their alternative climate change paradigm, published under pseudonyms.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/09/19/scien...

Their research, analysis, and conclusions should stand or fall on the merit, or lack of merit, contained within. Not on who they are. Kind of an interesting story.
Comment by Daniel Wachenheim on September 20, 2016 at 3:04pm
Tonya, we should treat one another with respect. People don't have to agree with each other and often don't.
Comment by Tonya R. Wheeler on September 16, 2016 at 11:27am

Hello all. I am new here. So...what is this group's etiquette protocol?

Comment by Donald L. Engel on September 11, 2016 at 9:00pm

From one ember to another, thanks.  LOL

Comment by Daniel Wachenheim on September 11, 2016 at 12:15pm
Don't worry about it Don. I know you don't mean anything bad. My fire is at the dimming ember stage anyway.
Comment by Donald L. Engel on September 11, 2016 at 11:59am

Dan, l knew what you wanted to say after I read the article.  I wasn't trying to pour water on your fire.

Comment by Daniel Wachenheim on September 11, 2016 at 11:38am
Donald, you are correct.
Comment by Donald L. Engel on September 11, 2016 at 11:28am

Daniel, the article doesn't talk about climate change, itself.  It talks about people's reaction to news of climate change. 

 

Members (51)

 
 
 

line

Update Your Membership :

Membership

line

line

Nexus on Social Media:

line

© 2016   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service