A lot of people seem to be enmeshed in post modernist thought which tells them everything is a narrative rooted in a culture that surrounds it, and therefore there is nothing objective from which we can judge the rightness or wrongness of another culture.
Into this void a lot of christian apologists have found roots, they say god is the objective narrative and the bible can be used to judge right and wrong and claim they are the measure stick. They seem to get away with this because pomo(post modern) thinkers tend to offer arguments of subtly against an argument of brute force.
What I am interested in is whether or not you subscribe to a pomo view of the world, and if you do, how do you counter the religionist who claims their narrative is foundation without judging them or the context in which they bring their argument forth.
If you do not subscribe to the pomo view of things, what is your position? Can we judge other cultures? If so by what measure?