The World's Largest Coalition of Nontheists and Nontheist Communities!
Latest Activity: yesterday
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Grinning Cat Jul 28.
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Grinning Cat Jun 24.
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Grinning Cat Jan 29.
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Joan Denoo Dec 18, 2014.
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Luara Nov 17, 2014.
Started by Grinning Cat. Last reply by Grinning Cat Oct 19, 2014.
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Luara Oct 15, 2014.
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Oct 14, 2014.
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Grinning Cat Oct 8, 2014.
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Jul 20, 2014.
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Jul 18, 2014.
Started by Merelen Jun 25, 2014.
Started by Merelen. Last reply by Idaho Spud Jun 18, 2014.
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner May 17, 2014.
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Idaho Spud May 16, 2014.
Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by Pat May 9, 2014.
Started by Loren Miller Apr 22, 2014.
Started by Grinning Cat. Last reply by Luara Apr 17, 2014.
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Luara Apr 13, 2014.
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Luara Apr 9, 2014.
Speaking of "forced-birth" politicians deliberately eroding abortion access, sex education, and contraception access:
(my tweak of an image I've seen on the web)
... forced-birth movement ...
... forced-birth movement ...
I'll have to remember that one. I haven't used the term pro-life, when describing them, for at least 5 or 6 years, since they're not, as you said. I pretty much always refer to them as anti-choicers. It'll be nice to have a swap-out term, though.
This is one of the things you get from religiously inspired movements. They deliberately misuse words to apply emotional triggers to things, rather than using words for clear, precise descriptions of the way things actually are.
You get a little bit of this from all sides, when it comes to politics, but I find it far, far more common on the conservative side of things.
I'm actually anti-abortion. I think we should do everything we can to reduce it, short of violating a person's bodily autonomy. Specifically, we need decent sex education and free access to contraception, which the anti-choicers are also against, strangely.
As for the high heel thing ... yeah, meh. Notice the feet of a woman who wears high heels all the time. Most people's toes aren't generally in a wedge shape like that, and the arches become all kinds of fucked up, such that their toes point up in the air, when they're walking barefoot, in some extreme examples of regular abuse.
I think high-heeled boots do a little less damage, since you have more side support, and lower heels aren't as bad, but after you crank people up more than an inch or so, it gets bad pretty quickly.
Some excellent framing I wish I'd learned about earlier:
Opposition to abortion access (a.k.a. the anti-choice "pro-life" movement) is aptly called the forced-birth movement.
(In a discussion arguing that nationwide marriage equality won't inspire the sort of conservative backlash Roe v. Wade did: "The forced birth movement was able to make a lot of hay over abortion because it is a private and not very pleasant experience - no one throws a party to celebrate their abortion, so the Right can paint women who have abortions as selfish baby killers. But the lies and myths and propaganda the Right has used against gay people can't survive our visibility...." There's also discussion there on the parallels between LGBTQ* and atheist visibility and acceptance.)
As Tim Peacock wrote: "Many of the people who call themselves pro-life are also pro-death penalty. They’re pro-war. They’re anti-welfare and regard those in need seeking assistance as below them.... None of those people are truly pro-life; rather, they’re anti-woman,anti-choice, and pro-forced-birth. And good luck to the child that enters the world in those circumstances: [cartoon below]"
That comparison of stiletto heels to mountain goats on a steep slope made me think of the submissive gesture of the very long ceremonial trousers that impeded normal walking, the naga-bakama that were sometimes required for samurai appearing before the shogun. This warrior is standing upright, not kneeling:
Anyway, a girlfriend whose shoe size was the same as mine once encouraged me to try on a pair of her moderately high-heeled boots. My gut reaction: "How do people keep their balance in these things?!?!"
Personal choices and preferences are fine; nobody should feel pressure to sacrifice their comfort and freedom of movement to look "sexy" for men!
Not me, Greg. just here to share a LOL captioned "What Ladies Have to Look Forward to This Halloween"
reading "Margaret Fuller - A New American Life", by Megan Marshall. Has anyone else read it?
Once in a while even sexist images can have a humorous twist.
Welcome toAtheist Nexus
Sign Upor Sign In
Or sign in with:
Nexus on Social Media:
© 2015 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.
Report an Issue |
Terms of Service
Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.