Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF)


Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF)

The Freedom From Religion Foundation, based in Madison, Wis., is a national association of freethinkers (atheists, agnostics) that has been working since 1978 to keep church and state separate.

Location: Madison
Members: 703
Latest Activity: Dec 26, 2017

Discussion Forum

Annie Laurie Gaylor Addresses NOFS "Freethought Fiesta"

Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by Loren Miller Nov 22, 2016. 6 Replies

This past April, the Northern Ohio Freethought Society sponsored a "Freethought Fiesta," which among other things featured some terrific Mexican cooking for attendees and a talk by Freedom From…Continue

Tags: Annie Laurie Gaylor, Northern Ohio Freethought Society, Freedom From Religion Foundation

Human soul

Started by Lemual Poot. Last reply by tom sarbeck Nov 3, 2016. 55 Replies

I've heard many so called atheists refer to the "soul" as if it actually existed.  My question is:  If you believe humans have a soul are you really an atheist? Continue

Be it enacted by citizens of United States of America, three citizens be designated as true patriots

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by Lemual Poot Jun 6, 2015. 6 Replies

Whereas, Olivia McConnell, Eight-year-old, wrote her South Carolina state representatives; and Whereas, Olivia provided a legitimate reason to suggest this legislation:1. One of the first discoveries…Continue

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) to add comments!

Comment by James M. Martin on January 10, 2012 at 6:03pm

Chris, you cannot be saying that pRick went loony because of Mr. Savage's website? Somebody would have sued by now. Oh, no, wait, politicians are open season in all aspects of their lives, and you can say anything you wish about one of them and they have no redress for slander.  None.  So, I don't think Savage went quite far enough.  I think he should have savaged him worse than Larry Flynt that fat little evangelical bullshit artist on TV.

Comment by Chris Dodds on January 10, 2012 at 6:00pm

@ Steph S.  What do you expect?  His last name is the term used for a bodily fluid milkshake.  If my last name was "Santorum", I'd be a little crazy too.

Comment by Steph S. on January 10, 2012 at 5:53pm

Yeah he is insane -- Santorum -- (Factotum)

Comment by James M. Martin on January 10, 2012 at 5:29pm

@matthew: That part got me, too, I mean especially.  I had to think it out later.  This is what he said: "It's a license to do things in the sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be."  First, exactly what does he have in mind.  By invoking "the sexual realm" and allowing the great unwashed to make of the suggestion what they will, he engages in classic generalization.  It is like saying, "even so-called 'married' gays have a thousand partners a year at least."  But it is all the more potent for its suggestions.  Too bad most of his followers are unaware of the old legal maxim: sometimes a half truth is the worst sort of lie.  Second, how are things supposed to be?  To you?  To me?  To the Pope?  To God?  Who are you to tell me I am supposed to stop before having any kind of sex soever and ask, "What would Jesus do?"  Why is your kind of sex (likely missionary position and, given his tribe, only for the purpose of procreation -- I mean, I think he had sex with his wife about seven times) superior to mine?  I am in the Old Testament as David loving Jonathan.  I am in the Old Testament as a horny goatherd newly arrived in Sodom and refused by Lot the right to a meal, a bit of wine, and sex with Lot's daughters: Rich condemns homosexuality (which was not what Sodom was infamous for) but fully approves of incest between Lot and his daughters, directly ordered by you know who.  Yep, God.  Mr. Factotum's problem is not that he is conservative and evangelical and part of the far religious right.  His problem is that he is insane.

Comment by James M. Martin on January 10, 2012 at 5:13pm

Factotum is only involved in straight bashing when it comes to women.  His evangelical view of women as "help mates" renders them subject to deprivation of rights (e.g. abortion).  A help mate is not as worthy of rights as a male.  Read your Bibles!

Comment by Carl Pastor on January 10, 2012 at 3:36pm

crap man, next hell ban masturbation and rhen where wud i be

Comment by Troy Gorsline on January 10, 2012 at 1:16pm

I have seen clips of that interview. This lead to the classic quote I heard from Dan Savage, the author and activist eternally linked to Rick Santorum, "... he's not just about gay bashing. He is about straight bashing, too..."

Comment by matthew greenberg on January 10, 2012 at 1:07pm

wow, that is too much.  my favorite part:

" It's a license to do things in the sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be." 

and Santorum knows what we should or shouldn't be doing in the bedroom?  what nerve. 

Comment by David W on January 10, 2012 at 1:04pm

More Santorum absurdity.

Comment by AgeOfAtheists14 on January 4, 2012 at 8:22am

@Joan thanks for sharing. Check this out!


Members (703)



Update Your Membership :




Nexus on Social Media:


© 2018   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service