LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends


LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends

Nontheist lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex people & friends.

Location: International
Members: 623
Latest Activity: Nov 18

Welcome to Gay / LGBTQI Atheists & friends!

The I in LGBTI

Discussion Forum

Gender Identity and Sustainability

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Oct 26. 0 Replies

Epigenetics and sexual orientation

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Oct 8. 0 Replies

Gaydar doesn't exist and it's bad?

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Daniel W Sep 13. 2 Replies

Homophobia as pathology

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Sep 11. 0 Replies

The Trans Issue

Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by Denise Deiloh Sep 3. 4 Replies

Does Obama's gay advocacy exclude trans

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Joan Denoo Jun 27. 5 Replies

Betty Bowers on PRIDE

Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by Daniel W Jun 5. 1 Reply

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends to add comments!

Comment by Daniel W on April 2, 2013 at 10:59am

Grinning cat, thanks for the link.  I read the article.  Kind of odd, tone deaf in many ways.  But also, showing some introspection.  Forced introspection but even that's an improvement.

If the republicans can give up their addiction to the religious right - fostered by Macchiavellians back to, what, Nixon?  Reagan? and concentrate on a philosophy that encompasses economic responsibility, and conservation of resources (conservatism?) as opposed to strip mining them, and back to "main street" business as opposed to mega massive ubercorporations, and "mind-your-own-business" social philosophy instead of govt intrusion into private lives, then they might have a better chance.

Actually, Repubs are not doing as bad as I would like.  They are in the Majority in congress.  The could overtake the senate in the next election, with attractive-enough candidates.  

Comment by The Flying Atheist on April 2, 2013 at 10:52am

Grinning Cat, I have a HUGE confession to make......I pretended to be 28 years old once again and I took the survey.  I hope that doesn't skew their official results.  :) 

Comment by Grinning Cat on April 2, 2013 at 9:46am

There's a survey, "How Do YOU View the Republican Party", that John Aravosis wrote about on AmericaBLOG.

You know the Republicans are panicking when they ask their members if they should still be opposed to gay marriage, abortion, and marijuana. But that’s what a new RNC survey does, much to the chagrin, one would imagine, of the party’s “family values” base.

The survey is aimed at under-30s of any political affiliation. One of the questions is "What would a Republican have to do or say to get you to vote for her/him?" Whether the survey is actually official (and deniable?) or not, maybe they need to hear from us!

Aravosis again:

... the RNC now lists gays along with other groups that are discriminated against, implicitly acknowledging that gay rights are civil rights....

The final question, that’s perhaps the most surprising, is the RNC asking people what their sexual orientation is.... die-hard GOPers like to claim that ... it’s “just a sex practice.” But this survey treats it as far more....

Oh, and Dear RNC, “in the closet” is not a sexual orientation.

One of the final questions is "Do you go to church or consider yourself religious or spiritual?"

Comment by Chrissie Farthing on April 2, 2013 at 8:15am

I used to tell people I had a Republican friend.  But I lied, I just have to admit the fact that I am prejudice.  If my daughter came home with one I'd throw them both out. It's a proven fact that most Republicans are mentally challenged and every thing they do is guided by this invisable man who lives in the sky. Most kids outgrow their invisable friend but not the Republican ones.  Now we find that the only reason they get married is to get a handout from the Government, is there no limit to their anti social behavior?

Comment by Tony Carroll on April 1, 2013 at 11:16pm

Sorry you guys had to find out this way. It is part of the super double secret hetero plan, and this dumb cow let it out of the bag too soon. Well, since you now know, I guess I can let you in on some of the other parts.


We straight men are looking for not only the tax benefits, but someone who can cook gourmet meals, keep the house immaculate, watch sports with, etc. Life will be FABULUUUUS!!!


Plus, we are planning on marrying all our heroes from the sports and entertainment world. Sexless, yes. But oh so fulfilling. Just sorry you had to find out this way. :)! (He says with tongue firmly in cheek). LOL.

Seriously, I find her a disgrace to all people, both straight and gay. Ya'll just keep on hanging in there, and remember, more of us are with you and support you than are against you. Peace.



Comment by Dominic Florio on April 1, 2013 at 9:50pm

Oh I agree with you.  What would be her test for marriage, if two hets want to marry for the benefits?  To quote a movie, "Stupid is as stupid does."  Someone should ask her if she is still fucking her husband or is she just with him for his benefits.

Comment by Dominic Florio on April 1, 2013 at 9:38pm

First of all, there is no rule or law that says that the two people getting married have to love each other or that they have to have sex.  Those things might be a common expectation, but the amount of sexless and/or loveless marriages between hets, tells us that it is not necessary for a relationship.  So if two people of the same sex, choose to marry, and one or both happen to be het, more power to them.  With today's economy many non-sexual couples pool resources, share homes, and yes, even share their lives.

Comment by Daniel W on April 1, 2013 at 9:33pm

Well, everyone knows, that's why straight people get married.  It's for the financial benefit.

Comment by Jim Greenamyer on April 1, 2013 at 8:50pm

When I read the thing about the Georgia GOP Chairwoman, I had to laugh!  At first I thought it was a spoof headline, but No!  She really said that!  HAHAHAHAHHA!  What a dumb f****ing HICK!!!  HAHAHAHAHA!

Comment by Grinning Cat on March 31, 2013 at 4:52pm

Sentient - that would explain a great deal about the Supreme Court! It's probably no accident that we've never seen any of Scalia's or Thomas's poetry. They want to keep their law clerks alive. :-)


Members (620)


© 2015   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service