The World's Largest Coalition of Nontheists and Nontheist Communities!
Nontheist lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex people & friends.
Latest Activity: 1 hour ago
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Tom Sarbeck on Monday.
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Jul 13.
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Andrew Jun 13.
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Andrew May 8.
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Apr 19.
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Bertold Brautigan Sep 28, 2016.
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Grinning Cat Aug 27, 2016.
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Joan Denoo Jul 20, 2016.
Started by Daniel W. Last reply by Grinning Cat Jun 22, 2016.
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Joan Denoo Apr 9, 2016.
@SentientThanks for the video. I didn't realize there was discrimination like that against "Asians." To be completely honest, I never thought of them as people "of color," as the guy in the video referred to himself. It's hard for me to blame people for not being attracted to people of color, as my attraction definitely has limits too. Is it conditioned? Probably. Could it be overcome? Perhaps, but I have no real desire to change even if it could.
Sentient, you can read into it what you want, but his words are exactly how I feel. He doesn't just think "sexuality is diverse"; he thinks sexuality is so diverse that it can't be "reduced to binary terms." Even in the time of our discussion on here, I have included links that attack the construct validity of dichotomous sexual orientation, which is exactly what Vidal has done. It's kind of like pointing out the absurdity that anyone would be biologically exclusively attracted to one sex when sexuality is so complex.For the record, I do see how a man of your faith could interpret it differently, as if sexuality is so complex that it cannot be accurately defined by singling out one attribute like sex. Doing so might even be deceptive, but not necessarily untrue.
Thank you The Nerd. Just asked to be a member.
Thank you for posting. You are right, we get an interesting perspective looking at the past. We still have progress needed ahead, but we have come so far....
Hi all...first time I post here but watching these videos is making me feel not too bad about being teased in high school......really. I can't believe that was the way it was back then.
The quote that I posted is not what you said. Posting it again ""idal has consistently argued that the term "homosexual" has no validity, because human sexuality is too complex and diverse to be reduced to binary terms." That does not state that he thinks all humans are bisexual. It says he thinks human sexuality is diverse. If he meant that he thinks all humans are bisexual, he would say so - Vidal is nothing if not careful with his words. Other than that correction, again, I won't be baited into that discussion again.
@SentientJust out of curiosity, what is it that you think separates Vidal's view from any other view that all humans have the potential to be attracted to both sexes (aka "are bisexual") that gives his more validity?@Dallas GaytheistI think Gore Vidal is me? Also, that propaganda video is terrible... I hate how harmful ignorance can be...
You've got mail! (here today a stroll outside would have the cold shower effect. Typical Pacific Northwest day.
Welcome toAtheist Nexus
Sign Upor Sign In
Update Your Membership :
Nexus on Social Media:
© 2017 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.
Report an Issue |
Terms of Service
Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.