LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends

Information

LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends

Nontheist lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex people & friends.

Location: International
Members: 617
Latest Activity: 25 minutes ago

Welcome to Gay / LGBTQI Atheists & friends!

Discussion Forum

Does Obama's gay advocacy exclude trans

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Joan Denoo on Sunday. 5 Replies

Betty Bowers on PRIDE

Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by Daniel W Jun 5. 1 Reply

Gay christians.

Started by Daniel W. Last reply by Gerald Payne May 13. 2 Replies

Boycotting Indiana

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Grinning Cat Apr 12. 12 Replies

Per Right Wing Watch, The Nuts Are Really Coming after the Fruits

Started by Bertold Brautigan. Last reply by Bertold Brautigan Apr 10. 2 Replies

Discrimination by nontheists?

Started by Jacob Dreiling. Last reply by Bertold Brautigan Mar 27. 15 Replies

The Lack Of LGBT Atheists

Started by Neon Genesis. Last reply by Grinning Cat Mar 27. 16 Replies

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends to add comments!

Comment by The Flaming Pi on May 23, 2010 at 5:33pm
If you got an accurate cross-section of society through randomized sampling, dividing into three groups (according to how the person self-identifies as "heterosexual", "bi", or "homosexual"). It would require the samples of the groups be roughly equal, or at least large enough to have an adequate n.

To be perfect, Daniel the Apostate is correct that it would be necessary to control for an extreme number of variables. However, for the first few studies in the series, fewer variables would need to be controlled and could be later refined through derivative work.
Comment by Daniel W on May 23, 2010 at 12:01pm
The only way for such a study to be statistially valid would be to include nutrition status, body habitus, age, ethnicity, kinsey scale status, birth order, and circumcision status, in a polynomial regression model. That will also be helpful with the baseball player issue.

I don't know if there will be a conflating issue of "grow-ers" vs. "show-ers". That might be a separate study.

Unfortunately, I'm too old and tired for such an exstensive research project. Mike, I'll leave that up to you.
Comment by Daniel W on May 23, 2010 at 10:51am
"Dear Democrats" - hits the nail on the head. It's a love/hate thing. The Democrats love to be in power and want to stay that way, and they love gay votes and money, but hate that gays want to be actually treated as human. "The gays" hate to see Rebuglicans back in power, with all that entails, and would love to be treated as equal but hey, better to be in a dysfunctional relationship, than have a noose around your neck, so generally support Democrats knowing full well it's not ideal.

Plus politicians and religionists in both parties know that gays have bigger penises and are very jealous.
Comment by Little Name Atheist on May 23, 2010 at 10:28am
sacha, this is of grave importance... do you know if bisexual men have larger or smaller penises than gay or heterosexual men?
Comment by Jaume on May 21, 2010 at 2:18pm
...and what's the difference between homosexual and heterosexual women? Hair length?
Comment by sacha on May 21, 2010 at 12:26pm
Comment by sacha on May 19, 2010 at 5:20pm
Comment by Marx on May 19, 2010 at 11:06am
Welcome to the group, Gaytheist. Your name sounds familiar. Are you on some other networking groups?
Comment by The Flaming Pi on May 19, 2010 at 10:40am
Yes. Welcome, Gaytheist. I'm glad you decided to join.
Comment by Little Name Atheist on May 19, 2010 at 10:39am
Welcome, The Gaytheist!
 

Members (617)

 
 
 

Support Atheist Nexus

Supporting Membership

Nexus on Social Media:

© 2015   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service