Information

Hang With Friends

Location: Earth
Members: 865
Latest Activity: on Sunday

Come on in, pull up a chair!

Picture yourself spending some time with congenial friends, sharing your lives and pictures from your cell phones." They're curious about that cool game, song, movie, camping trip, art show, or other event that fascinated you. You talk about all kinds of stuff, poetry, styles, personal achievements, relationships, and bad days. You can share your inner child, and laugh together. They sympathetically listen to your feelings about serious topics like politics or climate change, even when they don't agree.

Personal validation comes from paying attention to one another, giving more than you get. Everyone respects you and themselves, despite our amazing range of personal tastes and interests. They'll tell you they don't agree with an idea or behavior without implying you're a bad person or somehow deficient. It's an "I'm OK, You're OK" kind of fellowship, where nobody tries to make himself look better by picking on somebody else.

Nobody here is into mind games. A discussion started with a loaded guilt-throwing question will be deleted.

This group is not intended to compete with other groups on topics they cover but to "fill in the cracks." Whenever a discussion dwells at length on a topic for which there's an existing group, we urge you to provide members a link to that group to continue along their tangent.

A comment is a shout-out, which will get lost in a few days, because the comment wall is just a random stack.

Please start a discussion to share stories, photos, and videos. Replies will pop up in your "latest activity" and a conversation can develop from the feelings and thoughts you contributed. Groups are built on discussions.

Discussion Forum

The Burial Waltz

Started by Donatien Alphonse François. Last reply by Donatien Alphonse François Apr 26. 4 Replies

Hi everyone,It was almost a half-century ago, at age 15 or so, that I encountered one of the more important influences in my life: a crazy group of poets/musicians who called themselves The Fugs.They had a huge impact on me in that, though raised in…Continue

Some William Blake to Ponder

Started by Donatien Alphonse François. Last reply by Donatien Alphonse François Apr 25. 6 Replies

Hello all,I'm new here, and so hope this isn't old hat. But, I just had to point you toward a marvelous poem by William Blake in case you've never read it. Despite his sometimes heavily tinged biblical references in his other art and poetry, this…Continue

God's Not Dead - The Christian Persecution Complex (The Thinking Atheist)

Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by Annie Willis Apr 20. 7 Replies

Doubtless most if not all of you have heard about that sorry piece of cinema known as God's Not Dead, and perhaps its sequel, cleverly entitled: God's Not Dead 2 (wow, how original!).  Personally, I have wasted neither time nor money on either,…Continue

Tags: God's Not Dead, patheos, Neil Carter, The Thinking Atheist, Seth Andrews

Confirmed: flagged by religious people for "bullying."

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by Loren Miller Apr 19. 4 Replies

According to Seth Andrews @SethAndrewsTTA  Apr 16"Confirmed. TTA was flagged by religious people for "bullying." Apparently, criticism and skepticism = persecution. #GodHatesFacts"Others reported as "Flagged" and taken off line: @The Thinking…Continue

Tags: @SethAndrewsTTA, @morehead_sarah, @Matt_Dillahunty, @jteberhard, confirmed

The Value of Atheist Nexus ... and of Keeping Contact

Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by Joan Denoo Apr 17. 13 Replies

I don't know about you, but the last 24+ hours were VERY uncomfortable for me.  Why?  Because something I value a LOT, being Atheist Nexus and the people I care about on A|N were temporarily unavailable to me.  No, we're not Facebook; I don't think…Continue

Tags: maintenance, community, availability, Atheist Nexus

Atheist Pig STRIKES AGAIN!!!

Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by Qiana-Maieev Apr 5. 1 Reply

There's no getting around it, Atheist Pig is fast becoming my fave secular comic, and as evidence, I refer you to the following.  Jesus and Mo had better watch their respective asses, 'cuz they got a porker coming up on the outside, and I'm pretty…Continue

Tags: Atheist Pig

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Hang With Friends to add comments!

Comment by Plinius on June 12, 2015 at 3:28am

I never said to keep the bad news to yourself! And I begin to understand moving with difficulty a bit better now. I went to market just now - high winter shoes to ease the pain in my feet, careful not to lose my balance with that bad knee - and you can wait for someone behind your back talking about ´slow old hags´. Ha!

I'm glad your cats accompany you! Mine do that too, they seem to invite me to run with them.

Comment by sk8eycat on June 12, 2015 at 12:40am

You really want to know?  I'm trying to learn how to get around with a lightweight walker in a 75 year-old house with narrow doorways.... Without falling down.

And an elderly kitteh who likes to do figure-eights in front of me while I'm "practicing." 

.

Comment by Plinius on June 12, 2015 at 12:06am

I like that!

How is everybody?

Comment by Grinning Cat on June 11, 2015 at 3:28pm

Good one, Carl!

Plinius, I love the bumper sticker that sexologist Jill McDevitt offers for sale:

HOW TO HAVE A BIKINI BODY: 1. Put a bikini on a body

Comment by The Flying Atheist on June 11, 2015 at 3:15pm

Comment by Plinius on June 11, 2015 at 11:08am

I like that, Bertold! I've dieted for some forty years and I'm NOT yet ready for the catwalk!

Comment by Bertold Brautigan on June 11, 2015 at 10:36am

Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on June 10, 2015 at 5:11pm

Gerald, the Medieval Warm Period was a regional phenomenon. Earth as a whole was cooler than today. Source

Regions can have dramatic departures from their usual climate for years, without the planetary average shifting.

Cosmic ray flux has lagged behind the global temperature change since approximately 1970.

Figure 3: Reconstructed cosmic radiation (solid line before 1952) and directly observed cosmic radiation (solid line after 1952) compared to global temperature (dotted line). All curves have been smoothed by an 11 year running mean (Krivova 2003).

 "It seems to me to be an ideological worldview rather than empirical evidence that support's the man-made model."  LOL, what irony! I recently read that the 3% of scientists who don't support climate change consensus have strong commitments to a free market economy. If you want to start with the evidence, here's a NASA link.

Looking at the evidence is the foundation of my "emotive passion". Judicious reasoning is required to evaluate competing research and integrate the new knowledge into my understanding of reality. It's a constant challenge for me to come to grips, emotionally, with the implications of new data from the climate science. West Antarctic glaciers don't shrink because of my ideology, warm ocean water melts them. Then I learn about it and react with concern.

Not everyone has time to keep abreast. I often summarize in Ecological or Climate Concerns. A better daily source for Climate Change news is the Climate subreddit.

Thanks, Randall. Speaking of solar variations,

This diagram shows how the modeled effects of natural phenomena such as variations in solar intensity or volcanic emissions (shown by the blue band - a mean of multiple model simulations) are unable to explain the steady rise in temperature over the last forty years (shown by the black curve). Adding in the effects of anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gasses and aerosols to the models (red band) provides a very good reproduction of the observed temperature changes over the 20th century.

Source

Basically the sun was in a minimum phase while temperatures were going up.

Comment by Grinning Cat on June 10, 2015 at 11:28am

Ruth, thanks for that quick recap of recent evidence!

And Joan, I'll definitely check out The Better Angels of our Nature.

Comment by Randall Smith on June 10, 2015 at 7:27am

Great charts, Ruth! I'm not saying I agree with Archibald, although he proposes a convincing argument. It's like those creationists. Their explanations often sound plausible, especially to the gullible. But we know they are filled with falsehoods. Same with climate stats.

Archibald's conclusions are based on solar variations and volcanic ash--cyclical occurances.  I never want to be close-minded about science or even religion, for that matter.

 

Members (865)

 
 
 

Support Atheist Nexus

Supporting Membership

Nexus on Social Media:

© 2016   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service