Information

Hang With Friends

Location: Earth
Members: 876
Latest Activity: 14 hours ago

Come on in, pull up a chair!

Picture yourself spending some time with congenial friends, sharing your lives and pictures from your cell phones." They're curious about that cool game, song, movie, camping trip, art show, or other event that fascinated you. You talk about all kinds of stuff, poetry, styles, personal achievements, relationships, and bad days. You can share your inner child, and laugh together. They sympathetically listen to your feelings about serious topics like politics or climate change, even when they don't agree.

Personal validation comes from paying attention to one another, giving more than you get. Everyone respects you and themselves, despite our amazing range of personal tastes and interests. They'll tell you they don't agree with an idea or behavior without implying you're a bad person or somehow deficient. It's an "I'm OK, You're OK" kind of fellowship, where nobody tries to make himself look better by picking on somebody else.

Nobody here is into mind games. A discussion started with a loaded guilt-throwing question will be deleted.

This group is not intended to compete with other groups on topics they cover but to "fill in the cracks." Whenever a discussion dwells at length on a topic for which there's an existing group, we urge you to provide members a link to that group to continue along their tangent.

A comment is a shout-out, which will get lost in a few days, because the comment wall is just a random stack.

Please start a discussion to share stories, photos, and videos. Replies will pop up in your "latest activity" and a conversation can develop from the feelings and thoughts you contributed. Groups are built on discussions.

Discussion Forum

The Playboy Interview: Richard Dawkins

Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by Chris on Sunday. 14 Replies

I suppose it was the news that Playboy magazine was returning nudes to its pages after a year's hiatus that sufficiently perked my curiosity to check them out again.  I hadn't looked at Playboy since perhaps 2008, when I began to recognize that I…Continue

Tags: Richard Dawkins, Playboy

Such Lyrics!

Started by Donatien Alphonse François. Last reply by Grinning Cat Feb 13. 9 Replies

Hello Friends,I was ruminating a bit today on my sixty-some years existence. My mind went back to teenage years when I first figured out religion is not only obnoxiously loud, but also nothing I wanted anything to do with. Truly. I knew by age 15…Continue

degrading love — part two (TheraminTrees)

Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by Joan Denoo Feb 11. 1 Reply

TheraminTrees set up religion with his left in Part One of his treatise on how religion demeans and degrades the value of love.  Here in Part Two, he brings in a devastating, "Mike Tyson" right, which negates and invalidates any claim that either…Continue

Tags: Christianity, Islam, TheraminTrees, god, love

Questions......

Started by Thomas Murray. Last reply by k.h. ky Feb 9. 6 Replies

   It has been 6 month now since I signed up for Atheist Nexus membership. The past year has been sort of a bi-polar wave of emotions for me. I hope I wasn't offensive to the folks on here and I think I have been but I don't know to who. My desire…Continue

Proud Dad is REALLY Proud Now!

Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by Chris Jan 31. 15 Replies

As some of you may or may not know, my daughter is a television news producer, currently working in Nashville, Tennessee.  Her assignment is the morning news, which means she blasts herself up at umpti-ump in the morning to organize and prepare a…Continue

Tags: Emmy, news, television, daughter, dad

Men who challenge men to stop violence

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by Idaho Spud Jan 9. 19 Replies

Many men join in the effort to reduce violence against women and children and other men. He speaks of the need to place responsibility on men instead of focusing on women to stop violence. He offers a breath of fresh air, as do so many of the men on…Continue

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Hang With Friends to add comments!

Comment by Joan Denoo on December 29, 2016 at 6:46pm

In the 1970s I began to observe a trend in income distribution in the U.S. that revealed a stagnation of income from wage-work and an increase in unearned wealth, creating a wealth gap. I watch the spread grow wider, to the point that others now recognize this growing disparity. Why is it happening and why have we not heard about it in the commercial press? 

As wages stagnate, productivity rises. That increase in productivity raises profits to the owners of wealth and does not trickle down to the owners of labor. 

The answers to stagnating wages are easy, there was a major change in philosophy of income distribution that began with the crushing of labor unions, changing in taxation policies, increasing health care costs, and lowering of education funds. It was a plan that came with slogans that wage-workers also adopted, even as it was against their self-interest. "No new taxes!", the poor "Eat at the Government Trough!", "We can't afford grants and loans to pay for education!", "Take advantage of every crisis!". When Rahm Emanuel made that statement at the beginning of Obama's presidency, I knew working people were in economic trouble. That attitude, coupled with "No new taxes" meant money for war took precedence over money for people. 

Thus, through taxation policies, weakening labor unions, withholding funds from health care and education, gave advantages to those who earned their income from stocks, bonds, investments, and savings. 

Not only the U.S., but other countries suffered a growth of wealth for the top percentile and a stagnation of wages. This came about as poor countries took out loans from WMF and had problems or failed to repay the loans. This economic philosophy in favor throughout those worsening years is called the "Neo-Liberal" strategy. Neo-Liberalism failed! 

Why did this happen?

‘FAILED: What the “Experts” Got Wrong on the Global Economy’ - Mark...

Mark Weisbrot: FAILED - What the Experts Got Wrong on the Global Ec...

Global Economy. 2 of 3

'FAILED: What the "Experts" Got Wrong on the Global Economy' - Mark...

What philosophy should take the place of past economic theories? 

Who have the answers to economic policies? 

What will happen under Trump?

Comment by Grinning Cat on December 29, 2016 at 2:06pm

The Social Security Administration publishes statistics about popular baby names in the U.S. in different years and decades.

They also have "Top 5 names in each of the last 100 years", all on a single page.

Parents would do well, I think, to give their kids names that are not unheard-of, and with a normal spelling, so the kids don't have to go through life (or at least a decade or two) explaining it to everyone -- but also considering carefully before giving their kids an extremely common name like (for babies born this year) Emma or Olivia, or Noah or Liam, with a high chance of namesakes in every class or group.

Comment by Daniel W on December 29, 2016 at 9:53am

Ian, you name and Fred are excellent names.  What could be better than "Peaceful Ruler"? 

My dad's boss was named Daniel.  My parents wanted to give my brother the name, but didn't want the boss to think it was for him.  When I came along, they decided they still wanted to use the name so I got it.

I was thinking about "Im glad I'm not named...." and the first thought was "Edsel".  Then I looked it up and it's a good name, just wound up being an unpopular car.  My friend's sister was named "Sylvania" because her parent's liked the name of the TV set.  I always thought it was a pretty name but the origin of the name was unfortunate.   Then I looked it up and "Sylvania" is nice too.  Almost perfect, and no bible implications.  Maybe "Sylvan" or "Sylvanus" for a boy.

Comment by Idaho Spud on December 29, 2016 at 9:46am

Except mine would have to say 75 year old ....

Comment by Idaho Spud on December 29, 2016 at 9:45am

That curmudgeon T-shirt fits me also.

Comment by Ian Mason on December 29, 2016 at 12:15am

I got my name because my mum wanted one that couldn't be shortened. My father, grandfather and great-grandfather were all 'Fred', diminutive of Frederick (peaceful ruler). At school, most boys seemed to be called Steven/Stephen or Keith. They were the 'in' names of the decade.

Comment by Ian Mason on December 29, 2016 at 12:02am

I like it too. We tease each other a lot in my family, which is a lot of fun.

I hope everyone here has been enjoying the holiday season. I will try to catch up.

Comment by Plinius on December 28, 2016 at 11:55pm

I love the shirt, Ian!

Comment by Daniel W on December 28, 2016 at 5:55pm

Ian, wear it with pride!  Curmudgeons unite!

Comment by Bertold Brautigan on December 28, 2016 at 5:06pm

Ian - I'd be proud of that description. My doctor recently asked me, among a bunch of other questions, whether I'm irritable. I answered truthfully - it depends on who you talk to.

 

Members (876)

 
 
 

line

Update Your Membership :

Membership

line

line

Nexus on Social Media:

line

© 2017   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service