The World's Largest Coalition of Nontheists and Nontheist Communities!

# Puzzle in real analysis

Suppose f is a continuous function on some open subset S of the real numbers, to the positive real numbers.  Suppose the integral of f over S is finite.
An open subset of the real line is a union of disjoint open intervals (which could have endpoints at infinity.)      Define the length of the open subset as the sum of the length of the intervals.
So the question is, show that for any epsilon > 0, there's a delta such that for any open subset T of S with length(T) < delta, the integral of f over T is less than epsilon.

Views: 54

### Replies to This Discussion

(a,b) U [b,c) is an open subset, too. Are you defining a subclass of open intervals with which this particular problem deals, eliminating half-open intervals?

An open subset of the real line is a union of disjoint open intervals.  Could be finitely many, could be a union of countably many disjoint open intervals.

A half-open interval is not an open subset of the real line.  "Open" means that for each point x in the subset, the interval (x-a,x+a) is contained in the subset, for some nonzero  a.

Do you have in mind that all open subsets may be expressed as the union of disjoint open intervals? But that a particular open subset may also be expressed as, say, (a,b) U [b,c)?

Sure.  I could have just said "a continuous function on an open subset of the real line" but I said what an open subset of the real line "looks like" in case someone doesn't know.

## Support Atheist Nexus

Nexus on Social Media:

## Latest Activity

Ruth Anthony-Gardner posted a discussion

### Move to dump coal ash into water supplies

10 minutes ago
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Idiocracy Now in the group No Nonsense
38 minutes ago
amer chohan replied to amer chohan's discussion Feeling like a fish back in water. in the group Godless in the garden
1 hour ago

1 hour ago

1 hour ago

1 hour ago

### Honeybee on marigold flower.

1 hour ago
Loren Miller replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Idiocracy Now in the group No Nonsense
1 hour ago