I have yet to actually read her papers on this, but it's something to think about for sure. Black holes have always been a mathematical concept, we've never directly observed them, though the same could be said of the electron, and before that the atom. With evolving technology who knows where we'll be in 50 years. 

Hydrogen atom through an electron microscope (false coloring obviously)


http://phys.org/news/2014-09-black-holes.html#jCp



"I'm still not over the shock," said Mersini-Houghton. "We've been studying this problem for a more than 50 years and this solution gives us a lot to think about."


Mersini-Houghton describes an entirely new scenario. She and Hawking both agree that as a star collapses under its own gravity, it produces Hawking radiation. However, in her new work, Mersini-Houghton shows that by giving off this radiation, the star also sheds mass. So much so that as it shrinks it no longer has the density to become a black hole.

The paper, which was recently submitted to ArXiv, an online repository of physics papers that is not peer-reviewed, offers exact numerical solutions to this problem and was done in collaboration with Harald Peiffer, an expert on numerical relativity at the University of Toronto. An earlier paper, by Mersini-Houghton, originally submitted to ArXiv in June, was published in the journal Physics Letters B, and offers approximate solutions to the problem.




Views: 67

Replies to This Discussion

Ok, so apparently they have observed an electron. The same site had another post I found after posting this, and then of course I looked the video up on youtube. http://phys.org/news/2008-02-electron.html

RSS

About

line

Update Your Membership :

Membership

line

line

Nexus on Social Media:

line

© 2018   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service