Hi Guys,


I am a new (albeit very mature ;-)) medical student. It has come to my attention that a large proportion of my medical cohort are either a touch misogynistic or fundamental christians (where's the distincion I hear you say!!!). I am concerned, to say the least, that the class has a fair number of students who earnestly believe homosapiens popped up in the middle east 6-7,000 years ago. I don't know whether it makes a difference to clinical practice if you have no idea about the origins of the body or whether the refusal to accept scientific facts says anything about the way you will approach medical information/advances throughout your career. This is not to mention the ethical/moral problems I can see for a Christian in medical practice.


Do you think you can be a fundamental Christian can be an effective practitioner?




Views: 98

Replies to This Discussion

I would agree with DSE that a fundamentalist probably isn't an effective practitioner.  That said, I know 1-2 dozen out theists at my institution (all three Abrahamics) and in every cause I would take my future children to them with a medical problem, because I've seen them to be conscientious, observant, hard-working people who want to be good doctors.  The key of course is I think they would be that even if they weren't Catholic or Shi'a or whatever, which leads you to question where the source of their moral behavior is really their religion or their basic character.  They're also not fundamentalists.

As for what would concern me most about the medical practice of a fundamentalist, rather than worry about whether their differential is missing something because they don't believe in evolution, I would think more often the problem is that they're withholding treatments from the patient without informing them or otherwise making decisions in a way not consistent with what the patient would want.  You may have seen the paper in the last year or so showing that very religious patients are more likely than the less religious to use aggressive life-extending measures, and you can't help but wonder if that extends to physicians, regardless of the patient's request - and of course many patients won't even verbalize desires until prompted be a physician, and that's when they feel the physician isn't judging them.

How do they reconcile the evidence of DNA if they think we are descended from Noah?

Practitioner? They can be. A lot of medicine is rote memory. Plenty of religious people become doctors.

Just ignore them and carry on with your work. Questions will come up that they cannot reconcile particularly in genetics.


Support Atheist Nexus

Supporting Membership

Nexus on Social Media:

Latest Activity

Freethinker31 replied to Kambiz Nadri's discussion Your reaction when someone yells 'Allahu Akbar'
10 minutes ago
Qiana-Maieev replied to James Yount's discussion Unique and Interesting Instruments in the group Music Lovers
1 hour ago
Qiana-Maieev commented on Loren Miller's blog post Is Nothing Sacred?
1 hour ago
Qiana-Maieev liked Loren Miller's blog post Is Nothing Sacred?
1 hour ago
Joan Denoo commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's photo
2 hours ago
Joan Denoo liked Ruth Anthony-Gardner's photo
2 hours ago
Loren Miller posted a status
"“Sometimes people don't want to hear the truth because they don't want their illusions destroyed.” ― Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche"
2 hours ago
Loren Miller commented on Loren Miller's blog post Is Nothing Sacred?
3 hours ago

© 2016   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service