I've had so many arguments over the sacredness of technology for humankind and its religious implications, but this is the first article I've found that really delves into this topic. A lot of Ex-religious people seemed to me to have simply switched their faith structure from god to technology, bypassing profound understanding of science and it's spectrum of implications. Science is not "good" nor "bad" and scientific progress should not control us, we should control it...

I'm not certain this is the absolute best group for this topic, so if you have better suggestions go ahead...

To read in original webpage.

When Technology and Religion Converge

By Austin Cline, About.com Guide
  • The Religion of Technology: The Divinity of Man and the Spirit of Invention. David F. Noble.
  • Sleeping with Extraterrestrials: The Rise of Irrationalism and Perils of Piety. Wendy Kaminer.
  • Technology, Pessimism, and Postmodernism. Edited by Yaron Ezrahi, Everett Mendelsohn, and Howard P. Segal.
  • Cyberia: Life in the Trenches of Hyperspace. Douglas Rushkoff.
  • Medieval and Early Modern Science, Volume II. A.C. Crombie.

Many secularists and nonbelievers of various sorts tend to regard religion and science as fundamentally incompatible. This incompatibility is also imagined to extend to the relationship between religion and technology, since technology is a product of science and science cannot proceed without technology, especially today. Thus atheists marvel in disbelief how many engineers are also creationists, how many people in high-tech industries display high-energy religious motivations.

Why do we witness widespread enchantment with technology and at the same time a world-wide resurgence of religious fundamentalism? We shouldn't assume that the rise of both is simply coincidence. Instead of presuming that the education and training behind science and technology should always result in more religious skepticism and even a bit more atheism, we should wonder if perhaps empirical observations are actually disconfirming our ideas. Atheists are often ready to criticize theists for failing to deal with evidence that doesn't meet expectations, so let's not fall into that same trap.

Perhaps there are religious impulses underlying the drive of technology which has characterized modernity — religious impulses which might affect otherwise secular atheists, too, if they aren't self-aware enough to notice what's going on. In this way, unnoticed premises or attitudes will prevent technology and religion from being incompatible. Perhaps technology itself is becoming religious on its own, thus also eliminating incompatibilities.

Both possibilities should be explored and I think both are occurring to varying degrees. Indeed, I think that both have been happening for hundreds of years, but the clear religious foundations for technological advancement are either ignored or hidden away like embarrassing relatives. The enthusiasm so many people have had with technology is often rooted — sometimes unknowingly — in religious myths and ancient dreams.

This is unfortunate because technology has proven itself capable of causing terrible problems for humanity, and one of the reasons for this may be the religious impulses people are ignoring. Technology, like science, is a defining mark of modernity and if the future is to improve, certain elemental premises will have to be identified, acknowledged, and hopefully eliminated.

Religious & Technological Transcendence

The key to it all is transcendence. The promise of transcending nature, our bodies, our human natures, our lives, our deaths, our history, etc. is a fundamental part of religion which is often not explicitly recognized. This goes well beyond the common fear of death and desire to overcome it and results in a negation of all we are in an effort to become something else entirely.


For a thousand years in Western culture, the advancement of the mechanical arts — technology — has been inspired by deep religious desires of transcendence and redemption. Although currently obscured by secular language and ideology, the contemporary resurgence of religion, even fundamentalism, alongside and hand-in-hand with technology is thus not an aberration but simply the reassertion of a forgotten tradition. If you don't recognize and understand how religious and technological transcendence have developed together, you'll never be able to successfully counter them — much less recognize when they might be developing within you as well.

Medieval Science and Medieval Religion ... Use of Technology to Transcend the Sinful World

The project of technological advancement is not a recent development; its roots can be traced in the Middle Ages — and it is here also that the link between technology and religion develops. Technology came to be identified specifically with Christian transcendence of a sinful word and Christian redemption from a fallen human nature.

Early in the Christian era, nothing like this was considered. Augustine wrote in The City of God that "quite apart from those supernatural arts of living in virtue and reaching immortal beatitude," nothing humans can do can offer any sort of solace for a life condemned to misery. The mechanical arts, no matter how advanced, existed solely to aid fallen humans and nothing more. Redemption and transcendence could only be achieved through the unearned Grace of God.

This began to change in the Early Middle Ages. Although the reason is uncertain, historian Lynn White has suggested that the introduction of the heavy plow around the late 8th century into Western Europe may have played a role. We are accustomed to the idea of humanity's subjugation of the environment, but we need to be reminded that people didn't always see things this way. In Genesis, man had been given dominion over the natural world, but then sinned and lost it, and thereafter had to earn his way "by the sweat of his brow."

Through the help of technology, though, man could gain back some of that dominance and accomplish things he never could have alone. Instead of Nature always being one up on man, so to speak, the relationship between man and Nature was reversed — the capacity of the machine to do work became the new standard, allowing man to exploit what he had. The heavy plow might not seem like a big deal, but it was the first and important step in the process.

After this, machines and mechanical arts began to be depicted in the monastic illumination of calendars, in contrast to the previous use of solely spiritual images. Other illuminations depict technological advancements aiding the righteous armies of God while the evil opposition is depicted as technologically inferior. It may be here that we see the first tendrils of this attitude shift taking hold and technology becoming an aspect of Christian virtue. Quite simply: what was good and productive in life became identified with the prevailing religious system.

Monastic Science

The primary movers behind the identification of religion with technology were the monastic orders, for whom work was already effectively another form of prayer and worship. This was especially true of the Benedictine monks. In the sixth century, the practical arts and manual labor were taught as vital elements of monastic devotion by Benedict of Nursia. The purpose at all times was the pursuit of perfection; manual labor was not an end in itself but was always done for spiritual reasons. Mechanical arts — technology — fit easily into this program and so itself was also invested with spiritual purpose.


It is important to note that according to the prevailing patristic theology, humans were divine only in their spiritual nature. The body was fallen and sinful, so redemption could be achieved only by transcending the body. Technology provided a means to this by allowing a human to achieve much more than was otherwise physically possible.

Technology was declared by Carolingian philosopher Erigena (who coined the term artes mechanicae, mechanical arts) to be part of humanity's original endowment from God and not a product of our later fallen state. He wrote that the arts are "man's links to the Divine, [and] cultivating them a means to salvation." Through effort and study, our pre-Fall powers could perhaps be regained and thus we would be well along to achieving perfection and redemption.

It would be difficult to overstate the importance of this ideological shift. Mechanical arts were no longer simply a raw necessity for fallen humans; instead, they had become Christianized and invested with a spiritual significance that would only grow over time.

Mechanical Millennarianism

The development of millennarianism in Christianity also had a significant impact upon the treatment of technology. For Augustine, time was plodding and unchanging — the record of fallen humans not going anywhere in particular any time soon. Fo so long, there was no clear and tangible record of any sort of progress. Technological development changed all this, especially once it was identified as having a spiritual importance. Technology could, in ways everyone saw and experienced first-hand, give assurance that humanity was improving its position in life and was succeeding over nature.


A new millennium mentality developed, making explicit use of the fruits of technology. Human history was redefined away from Augustine's concept of tiresome and tearful time and towards an active pursuit: attempts to achieve perfection. No longer were people expected to face a bleak history passively and blindly. Instead, people are expected to consciously work on perfecting themselves — partially through the use of technology.

The more mechanical arts developed and knowledge increased, the more it looked like humanity was coming closer to the end. Columbus, for example, thought that world would end in around 150 years from his time and even regarded himself as playing a role in the fulfillment of end-times prophecies. He had a hand in both the broadening of marine technology and raw knowledge development with the discovery of new continents. Both were regarded by many as important milestones on the path to perfection and, hence, The End.

Thus, technology was becoming part and parcel of eschatology.

Enlightenment Science and Enlightenment Religion ... Francis Bacon, Original Sin, and the Millennium

England and the Enlightenment played important roles in the development of technology as material means to spiritual ends.Soteriology (study of salvation) and eschatology (study of end-times) were common preoccupations in learned circles. Most educated men took very seriously the prophecy of Daniel that "many shall run to and fro,and knowledge shall be increased" (Daniel 12:4) as a sign that The End was close.


Their attempts to increase knowledge about the world and improve human technology was not part of a dispassionate program to simply learn about the world, but instead to be active in millennarian expectations of Apocalypse. Technology played a key role in this as the means by which humans regained mastery over the natural world which was promised in Genesis but which humanity lost in the Fall. As historian Charles Webster observes, "The Puritans genuinely thought that each step in the conquest of nature represented a move towards the millennial condition."

Roger Bacon

An important figure in the development of modern Western science is Roger Bacon. For Bacon, science meant primarily technology and mechanical arts — not for any esoteric purpose but for utilitarian goals. One interest of his was that the Antichrist not be in sole possession of technological tools in the coming apocalyptic battles. Bacon wrote that:
Antichrist will use these means freely and effectively, in order that he may crush and confound the power of this world... the Church should consider employment of these inventions because of future perils in the times of Antichrist which with the grace of God it would be easy to meet, if prelates and princes promoted study and investigated the secrets of nature.
Bacon also believed, like others, that technological know-how was an original birthright of humanity which had simply been lost in the Fall. Writing in his Opus Majus, he suggested the contemporary gaps in human understanding stem directly from Original Sin: "Owing to original sin and the particular sins of the individual, part of the image has been damaged, for reason is blind, memory is weak, and the will depraved."


So for Roger Bacon, one of the early lights of scientific rationalism, the pursuit of knowledge and technology had three reasons: First, so that the benefits of technology would not be the sole province of the Antichrist; second, in order to regain power and knowledge lost after the Fall in Eden; and third, in order to overcome current individual sins and achieve spiritual perfection.

Baconian Inheritance

Bacon's successors in English science followed him very closely in these goals. As Margaret Jacob notes: "Almost every important seventeenth century English scientist or promoter of science from Robert Boyle to Isaac Newton believed in the approaching millennium." Accompanying this was the desire to recover the original Adamic perfection and knowledge lost with the Fall.


The Royal Society was founded in 1660 for the purpose of improving general knowledge and practical knowledge; its Fellows worked at experimental inquiries and the mechanical arts. Philosophically and scientifically, the founders were strongly influenced by Francis Bacon. John Wilkins, for example, claimed in The Beauty of Providence that the advancement of scientific knowledge would allow humanity to recover from the Fall.

Robert Hooke wrote that the Royal Society existed "to attempt the recovery of such allowable arts and inventions as are lost." Thomas Sprat was certain that science was the prefect way to establish "man's redemption." Robert Boyle thought that scientists had a special relationship with God — that they were "born the priest of nature" and that they would ultimately "have a far greater knowledge of God's wonderful universe than Adam himself could have had."

The Freemasons are a direct outgrowth and excellent example of this. In Masonic writings, God is identified very specifically as a practitioner of mechanical arts, most often as the "Great Architect" who had "the Liberal Sciences, particularly Geometry, written on his Heart." Members are encouraged to practice the same scientific arts not only to reclaim lost Adamic knowledge but also to become more God-like. Freemasonry was a means to redemption and perfection through the
cultivation of science and technology.

A particular legacy of Freemasonry for the rest of society is the development of engineering as a profession by Freemasons in England. August Comte wrote of the role engineers would play in humanity's reclamation of Eden: "the establishment of the class of engineers... will, without doubt, constitute the direct and necessary instrument of coalition between men of science and industrialists, by which alone the new social order can commence." Comte suggested that they, the new priesthood, imitate priests and monks by renouncing pleasures of the flesh.

At this point it is worth noting that in the Genesis account, the Fall occurs when Adam and Eve eat fruit of knowledge — knowledge of good and evil. So it is ironic that we find scientists promoting an increase in knowledge in the pursuit of regaining the lost perfection. It isn't a complete contradiction, but it is a conflict which I have not seen resolved.


Modern Science & Modern Religion ...Transcendence, Religious and Technological

Nothing described thus far is ancient history because the legacy of religious science and technology remain with us. Today, the religious impulses underlying technological advancement take two general forms: using explicit religious doctrines, particularly Christianity, to explain why technology should be pursued and using religious imagery of transcendence and redemption removed from traditional religious doctrines but without their losing any motivating power.


An example of the first can be found in modern space exploration. The father of modern rocketry, Werner Von Braun, made use of Christian millennarianism to explain his desire to send humans into space. He wrote that the world was "turned upside down" when Jesus came to earth and that "the same thing can happen again today" by exploring space. Science did not conflict with his religion, but instead confirmed it: "In this reaching of the new millennium through faith in Jesus Christ, science can be a valuable tool rather than an impediment." The "millennium" he spoke of was the End Times.

This religious fervor was carried along by other leaders of America's space program. Jerry Klumas, once a veteran systems engineer at NASA, wrote that explicit Christianity was normal at the Johnson space center and that the increase in knowledge brought by the space program was a fulfillment of the aforementioned prophecy in Daniel.

All the first American astronauts were devout Protestants. It was common for them to engage in religious rituals or reveries when in space and they generally reported that the experience of space flight reaffirmed their religious faith. The first manned mission to the moon broadcast back a reading from Genesis. Even before astronauts stepped out onto the moon, Edwin Aldrin took communion in the capsule — this was the first liquid and first food eaten on the moon. He later recalled that he viewed the earth from a "physically transcendent" perspective and hoped that space exploration would cause people to be "awakened once again to the mythic dimensions of man.

Artificial Intelligence

The attempt to divorce thinking from the human mind represents another attempt to transcend the human condition. Early on, the reasons were more explicitly Christian. Descartes regarded the body as evidence of humanity's "fallenness" rather than divinity. Flesh stood opposed to reason and impeded the mind's pursuit of pure intellect. Under his influence, later attempts to create a "thinking machine" became attempts to separate immortal and transcendent "mind" from mortal and fallen flesh.


Edward Fredkin, an early apostle and researcher in AI, became convinced that its development was the only hope for prevailing over human limitations and insanity. According to him, it was possible to view the world as a "great computer" and he wanted to write a "global algorithm" which, if methodically executed, would lead to peace and harmony.

Marvin Minsky, who directed the AI program at MIT, regarded the human brain as nothing more than a "meat machine" and the body as a "bloody mess of organic matter." It was his hope to achieve something more and something greater — some means of transcending what his humanity was. Both brain and body were, in his opinion, easily replaceable by machines. When it comes to life, only the "mind" is really important and that was something he wanted to achieve by technology.

There are common desires among AI community members to use machines to transcend their own lives: download their "minds" into machines and perhaps live forever. Hans Moravec has written that intelligent machines would provide humanity with "personal immortality by mind transplant" and that this would be a "defense against the wanton loss of knowledge and function that is the worst aspect of personal death.


I don't have the time or space to even begin to address the many religious themes behind nuclear weapons or genetic engineering - but I do need to spend some time on a technological development very relevant here: cyberspace and the internet. There is no question but that the progress of the internet into people's lives is having a profound effect upon human culture. Whether you are a technophile and welcome this or neo-luddite and oppose it, all agree that the old civilization is ending and something new is beginning. Many of the former regard this as a form of salvation while the latter see this as yet another Fall.


If you read the writings of many of the technophiles who work hardest to promote the use of cyberspace, you cannot help but to be struck by the obvious mysticism inherent in the experiences they are attempting to describe. Karen Armstrong has described the mystic's experience of communion as "a sense of unity of all things... the sense of absorption in a larger, ineffable reality." Although she had traditional religious systems in mind, it is worth remembering this description as we look at ostensibly non-religious statements from secular apostles of cyberspace.

John Brockman, digital publisher and author, has written "I am the Internet. I am the World Wide Web. I am information. I am content." Michael Heim, consultant and philosopher, has written: "Our fascination with computers... is more deeply spiritual than utilitarian. When on-line, we break free from bodily existence." We then emulate the "perspective of God", an all-at-oneness of "divine knowledge." Michael Benedikt writes "Reality is death. If only we could, we would wander the
earth and never leave home; we would enjoy triumphs without risks and eat of the Tree and not be punished, consort daily with angels, enter heaven now and not die."

Once again, we find technology — the internet — being promoted as a means to transcendence. For some, this is a non-traditional religious transcendence of the body and material limitations in the ephemeral, ineffable realm known as "cyberspace". For others, it is an attempt to transcend our limitations and reacquire personal divinity.

Technology & Religion, Technology as Religion ...When Technology and Religion converge

In other sections, we examined at the question of whether or not science and technology really were incompatible with religion as is so commonly thought. I offer no definitive answer here, but I think that I have sufficiently muddied the waters of "conventional wisdom" among atheists that there is absolute incompatibility. It seems that they can be very compatible at times, and furthermore that the pursuit of technological advancement has often been a direct result of religion and religious aspirations.


But what should concern secularists and nonbelievers more is the fact that those religious aspirations are not always obviously religious in nature — and if they aren't so obviously religious in the traditional sense, one might not recognize a growing religious impulse within themselves. Sometimes, the desire or promotion of technological progress has stemmed from the fundamental religious impulse to transcend humanity. While the traditional religious stories and mythology (such as explicit Christian references to Eden) may have since fallen away, the impulse remains fundamentally religious, even when this is no longer recognizable to those actively engaged in it.

For all the other-worldly goals of transcendence, however, very worldly powers have benefitted. Benedictine monks were among the first to use technology as a spiritual tool, but eventually their status depended upon their loyalty to kings and popes — and so labor stopped being a form of prayer and became a means for wealth and taxes. Francis Bacon dreamed of technological redemption, but achieved the enrichment of the royal court and always placed the leadership of a new Eden in the hands of aristocratic and scientific elite.

The pattern continues today: the developers of nuclear weapons, space exploration and artificial intelligence may be propelled by religious desires, but they are sustained by military financing and the results of their labors are more powerful governments, more pernicious status quo, and a more preeminent elite of technocrats.

Technology as Religion

Technology causes problems; there is no disputing this fact, despite all our attempts to use technology to solve our problems. People keep wondering why new technologies have not solved our problems and met our needs; perhaps now, we can suggest one possible and partial answer: they were never meant to.


For many, the development of new technologies has been about transcending mortal and material concerns completely. When an ideology, a religion, or a technology is pursued for the purpose of escaping the human condition where problems and disappointments are a fact of life, then it shouldn't be at all surprising when those human problems are not really solved, when human needs are not entirely met and new problems are produced.

This is itself a fundamental problem with religion and why technology can be a menace — especially when pursued for religious reasons. I am by no means a luddite and do not dispute the use of technology. For all the problems which we create for ourselves, only we will be able to solve them — and technology will be one of our principle means. What is required is not so much a change of means by abandoning technology, but a change in ideology by abandoning the misguided desire for transcending the human condition and taking flight from the world.

This won't be easy to do. Over the past couple of centuries, technological development has come to be seen inevitable and essentially deterministic. The use and development of technology has been removed from political and ideological debates. The goals are no longer considered, just the means. It has been assumed that technological progress will automatically result in an improved society — just witness the race to install computers in schools without any consideration of how they will be used, much less any attempt to consider who will pay for technicians, upgrades, training and maintenance once the computers are purchased. Asking about this is seen as irrelevant — and worse, irreverent.

But this is something which we atheists and secularists in particular must ask ourselves. A great many of us are big promoters of technology. Most reading this on the internet are big fans of the powers and potentials of cyberspace. We have already rejected traditional religious mythologies as motivations in our lives, but have any of us missed inherited motivations towards transcendence in our technological boosterism? How many secular atheists who otherwise spend time critiquing religion are actually driven by an unrecognized religious impulse to transcend humanity when they are promoting science or technology?

We must take a long, hard look at ourselves and answer honestly: are we looking to technology to escape the human condition with all its problems and disappointments? Or are we instead looking to enhance the human condition, flaws and imperfections notwithstanding?

Views: 357

Replies to This Discussion

That's really long reading ;-)
Can it be summarized by answering this simple question: do we need science because we are eager to expand our knowledge or we need science just as the means to make more gadgets (meaning technology)?
It's not the purpose of science that's in question but the 'necessity' we assume for all the gadgets

I've had many discussions on the gadget that I call "life at all costs", "must" be born and "must" not die. As if our species was on the brink of extinction or something! My other pet peeve is the gadget called space travel. I think both these gadgets are totally indicative of a religious state of mind, whether it be godless or not.
Then we should ask ourselves what the goals of our lives might be and whether we are supposed to ask such questions (animals for example don't question their lives). If we clear somehow on that then we might proceed asking what the difference between goal and god.

Is the goal a God (or anything godlike, space travel and aliens will do) or something else?

IMHO to have a gadget as a goal is even worse then religion

But those modern gadgets! Wow(!) They are soo kool! Besides..

They occupy our minds distracting us from tackling bigger questions. Doing so they create a set of comfortable illusions like being more effective, more productive etc.

Anyway as Haruki Murakami use to say whatever we do it ends up as a doodoo or as we use to say in russia "whatever you eat you throw up with a salad"

So it's all about goals. By goals I mean personal goals. The goal of a society is another cliché I don't believe because as the modern history shows the collective wisdom isn't necessarily a wise one.
Where does naturalism find itself on this topic of what some insist on insulting with "luddite" what others consider frivolous gadgetry and pagentry and religiosity, or as the philosopher/economist Thornsten Veblen called it: Conspicuous spending?
We aren't trying to escape or enhance the human condition any more than the other, and they're not mutually exclusive. I've known for some time that my transhumanist urge for "Transcendence" as its put here, comes from the same root as the religious impulse. I've made my peace with it, and consider it a unifying theme, a common ground for dialogue with my fellow man, belief in the sun-god or no. As all of us here more or less agree, gods aren't the makers, they're constructs, just like everything else associated with the Sapient. They're just lesser constructs, tools for coping with an uncaring, unfeeling reality from a past age, and represent more to some than perhaps they should. The difference between religious and atheistic transhumanism, then, is the lack of reverence for our tools, the willingness to cast aside a tool that has served us well or not at all.
A few points.

I think that if current science ( and therefore technology ) is based on primitive ignorance, fear instincts and the fantasies that were invented for consolation, is, in my opinion, completely irrelevant to the current human condition. What's now essential is that solid knowledge replaces (albeit slowly) wild flights of the imagination.


What do you call transcendence?. ( "We have already rejected traditional religious mythologies as motivations in our lives, but have any of us missed inherited motivations towards transcendence " )

Yes, we have inherited a lot of crap and some of us are more stuck in it than others. But transcendence's literal meaning (from Latin), of climbing or going beyond happens daily in the world of science.

On a personal level, Kant's transcendental means knowledge about our cognitive faculty with regard to how objects are possible a priori. "I call all knowledge transcendental if it is occupied, not with objects, but with the way that we can possibly know objects even before we experience them."
This knowledge (in construction) is now being made available from psycology, neurology. and neurosciences. It certainly replaces the vague notions of souls and possible afterlife and does help bring one a better understanding of what it is to "be in existence and know about it."

As for the trancendence that was provided by mystical ideals and spiritual experiences of old, it can now be easily be found in the experience of "awe" provoked by the diffuse but new knowledge of our real position in this universe.

"...are we looking to technology to escape the human condition with all its problems and disappointments?"

Some of us escape in the proverbial ostrich manner, others want to escape forward by constantly searching ahead. If by escaping you mean evolving from previous conditions, then I'm of the latter kind.


© 2019   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: The Nexus Group.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service