No Nonsense

Anti-pseudoscience, anti-woo, pro science, pro critical thinking, no conspiracy theories, no spin. Count the logical fallacies. No Nonsense!

Members: 353
Latest Activity: Nov 7

"Keep an open mind – but not so open that your brain falls out" -unknown

"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan

"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence." -- Christopher Hitchens

What is a logical fallacy? All arguments have the same basic structure: A therefore B. They begin with one or more premises (A), which is a fact or assumption upon which the argument is based. They then apply a logical principle (therefore) to arrive at a conclusion (B). An example of a logical principle is that of equivalence. For example, if you begin with the premises that A=B and B=C, you can apply the logical principle of equivalence to conclude that A=C. A logical fallacy is a false or incorrect logical principle. An argument that is based upon a logical fallacy is therefore not valid. It is important to note that if the logic of an argument is valid then the conclusion must also be valid, which means that if the premises are all true then the conclusion must also be true. Valid logic applied to one or more false premises, however, leads to an invalid argument. Also, if an argument is not valid the conclusion may, by chance, still be true. For a more thorough discussion of logical fallacies and how to structure a logical argument, see the New England Skeptical Society's article, How To Argue.

Top 20 Logical Fallacies (in alphabetical order) taken from -

The Skeptics' Guide To The Universe

The New England Skeptical Society The Skeptics' Guide To The Universe Science-Based Medicine
The James Randi Educational Foundation
Bad Science by Ben Goldacre
Simon Singh and his fight to mend British libel laws
Professor Richard Wiseman
PZ Myers' Pharyngula
Dr. Phil Plait and Bad Astronomy
Skeptic Blog
Michael Shermer's Baloney Detection Kit
The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark by Carl Sagan
The Skeptics' Dictionary
List of cognitive biases
Don Watson - Weasel Words
A List of Fallacious Arguments

Chat #NoNonsense

"No skeptic, to my knowledge, ever made a major scientific discovery or advanced the welfare of others."

-- Deepak Chopra (yes, he actually said that)

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the most discoveries, is not "Eureka!" (I found it!) but That's funny..." -Isaac Asimov

The scientific world view is full of awe and wonder. Understanding how truly awesome the universe is – in its elegant complexity, its staggering beauty, and the many intricate systems of which it is comprised – gives a profound feeling of connectedness and sparks the imagination. And it has the advantage of being real. -Steven Novella

The glory which is built upon a lie soon becomes a most unpleasant incumbrance. How easy it is to make people believe a lie, and how hard it is to undo that work again.
— Mark Twain

Discussion Forum

My arguments are always valid

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by tom sarbeck Nov 6. 4 Replies

The heart of anti-atheist prejudice is distrust

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by tom sarbeck Oct 20. 2 Replies

Idiocracy Now

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Joseph P Sep 2. 4 Replies

Talking Nonsense as US Politcs

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by tom sarbeck Aug 17. 6 Replies

A Quick Puzzle to Test Your Problem-Solving

Started by Grinning Cat. Last reply by tom sarbeck Jul 4. 6 Replies

Spot Graphics that Lie

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Joseph P Jun 25. 49 Replies

Susceptibility to Bias

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Joan Denoo Jun 23. 1 Reply

Gish Gallop

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Loren Miller Jun 21. 7 Replies

Political discourse in US - fundamentally fallacious

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by tom sarbeck May 29. 14 Replies

Liberal Washing

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Gerald Payne May 19. 4 Replies

Information Technology amplifies irrational group behavior

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Grinning Cat Mar 22. 10 Replies

Hell for christians? Hell for all?

Started by Patricia. Last reply by Bertold Brautigan Mar 3. 58 Replies

Hunger influences decisions

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Joseph P Feb 19. 2 Replies

Why Name Calling

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Oct 30, 2014. 0 Replies

Psychic Power-NOT

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Michael Penn Oct 14, 2014. 7 Replies

Fighting Against Abstinence Only Education.

Started by Patricia. Last reply by Joseph P Aug 6, 2014. 7 Replies

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of No Nonsense to add comments!

Comment by Glenn Sogge on September 15, 2010 at 9:53am
QotD: "Few people would deny the need to explain unusual phenomena (e.g., flying hippos), but fewer would demand an explanation for what is common and ordinary (e.g., time), and it is precisely here where the task of the philosopher begins, first in making us de-familiarize ourselves with, and question the nature of, the ordinary, and then in attempting to explain it." ~ Article on The Principal of Sufficient Reason in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Comment by sacha on September 13, 2010 at 11:45pm
quote of the day:

"If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?"

(From Alice In Wonderland)
Comment by Daniel W on September 13, 2010 at 10:50am
Many in China distrust vaccines - no Zhenny McCarthy yet tho. China mass measles vaccination plan sparks outcry.

A few thoughts-
distrust of vaccines is not just an effete syndrome of silly coddled Westerners. some lessons for us.
Underlying causes of that distrust are an issue - see article.
China is ascendant - will replace US as dominant world power in this century (my opinion, but I think others feel that way). It's an aggressive nation and there is reason for concern. I always feel some schadenfreude when I see articles like this. Bad me.
Comment by Susan Stanko on September 13, 2010 at 10:49am
Talk about a reading comprehension problem.
Comment by sacha on September 13, 2010 at 2:09am
quote of the day:

"Logic: The art of thinking and reasoning in strict accordance with the limitations and incapacities of the human misunderstanding."

-Ambrose Bierce
Comment by sacha on September 13, 2010 at 1:43am
Comment by Daniel W on September 12, 2010 at 6:54pm
Interesting. I've always respected CSM even tho the religion itself is so much hooey, and dangerous hooey at that - like many other religions. I just subscribed on my e-reader, based on IJM's recommendation - it's a 14-day free trial, so I like that. I don't know if reading liberal BS is an antidote to conservative BS. Although Dame Judy Dench did state in the Chronicles of Riddick that sometimes you have to fight evil with another kind of evil, or something like that. And I'll believe anything she says in a sci fi movie especially when referring to Vin Diesel.
Comment by Jason Spicer on September 12, 2010 at 4:26pm
I can't read the Christian Science Monitor because of the name and the BS of the founder. I hate the woo on HuffPo, but the politics and media sections are pretty good, especially Jason Linkins. You just have to ignore the woo-swamp of the Living and Religion sections and anything having to do with medicine. At minimum, HuffPo is a necessary political antidote to Faux News. Now if we can just come up with an online newspaper dedicated to actual fact regardless of topic...
Comment by It's just Matt on September 12, 2010 at 3:14pm
The Christian Science Monitor is more accurate than the Huffington Post and most newspapers/sites. I was introduced to it by my Geography teacher who told the class not to be scared off by the title. Unless you click on the specific Christian articles, the whole site serves as a wealth of real coverage of actual events. It is just the original founder stated in her will that it had to remain named The Christian Science Monitor.
Comment by Daniel W on September 12, 2010 at 2:27pm
i get huff on my kindle. it aggregates some news in a way that is not available in that format otherwise. i loathe celeb shit and abhor twinkie woorhea, but other parts are useful to me. It's a little like picking onions off a burger so avoid the breath, but sometimes I gotta pinch my nose and dive in.

Members (353)


Support Atheist Nexus

Supporting Membership

Nexus on Social Media:

© 2015   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service