I am somewhat familiar with atheism, but I want to be educated on what science aspects go alongside atheism. I want to be able to properly and intelligently defend my reasoning of being atheist to my religious family. Also, if anyone knows any good books I should read, it would be greatly appreciated if you let me know. Thank you!

Views: 1506

Replies to This Discussion

Actually, somewhat better than any books would be this.

Wow.  What a wide open question and a good one too.  Let me a start with a general viewpoint and then give a few a specific books for specific areas at the end.

In general, science - the most successful method of acquiring knowledge that we have found to date - has as one of it's key properties, atheism.  Now, most scientists wouldn't word it that way, they would use the term "methodological naturalism."  What that term means, is that when looking for and explanation to a phenomenon, it is assumed that events follow causal (or at least statistical) chains acting under natural laws.  That is to say, "no gods allowed."  But this was not some ad-hoc philosophy inserted by atheist scientists to convert the pious.  In fact, it became a working assumption when most professionals doing science had (or at least professed) some kind of religious belief.  The reason MN became a part of the method of science was because it worked.  In other words, if we want to interrogate nature to figure out how it works, the best method available to us, tells us to begin with the premise that there is no intelligent design behind this system.  As I said, this was not some dogmatic decree.  In fact, if the intelligent design premise had been better at explaining what we see and predicting what will see in the future, we wouldn't be having this discussion.  So, has science found god? No, in fact science works better when it doesn't even look. For a general discussion of science, I agree with Joseph's recommendation of "The Demon-Haunted World."  Also any good text book on the history of science. (Aliotos, "A History of Western Science" or Asimov's Chronology of Science and Discovery are both excellent).

For specifics:  Evolution - Believe it or not, "On the Origin of Species."  Darwin was a heck of a good writer besides being a brilliant biologist.  He also answered most of the religious objections to evolution in it (shame I still have to repeat him 150 yrs later).  For more recent works, Coyne's "Why Evolution is True" and Dawkin's "The Ancestor's Tale"

Big Bang - Hawking's "A Brief History of Time,"  Stenger's "The Comprehensible Cosmos," Krause's "A Universe From Nothing."

Does science have anything to say about the existence of god - Both by Victor Stenger; "Has Science Found God?" and "God: The Failed Hypothesis"

I know that's quite a reading list I shot at you, but hopefully you can cut it down based on the specific area you were looking for.  On the other hand, they are all great reads so you may just want to read them all anyway.

Hope this helps.

Hi Kaila. I don't know if this helps, but in fact you don't really need to defend yourself as an atheist. Theists and indeed deists make extraordinary claims, and the onus is on them to defend their position with evidence to support their extraordinary claims. I'd actually reccomend reading the bible, (most Christians have not done this, just accepted the bits their Sunday school teachers taught them - after all, this a book promoting genocide, talking donkeys and sectarianism. Ask your Christian friends why in Luke 19:27 Jesus demands that those who would not accept his being king over them should be slayed in front of him... Leviticus defies belief in what god says you can't and can do. Oh, and where did Noah find a pair of penguins in Palestine?).
Try CJ Werlemans 'God hates you, hate him back'. You don't need science per se to take an atheist stance - it is not up to you to defend your non belief, it is up to the "faithful" to prove the value of theirs. Science provides a workable and testable model of the universe. Religious apologists will try to squirm out of this fact by saying "science tells us how, but religion tells us why". This is nonsense, the why question is meaningless. Not all questions are worthy of an answer, or indeed meaningful at alll. To quote Richard Dawkins, 'why are unicorns hollow?' Science asks meaningful questions and tests their veracity with skepticism. Religion makes unfounded assertions based on no evidence other than tradition. Look up anything by Christopher Hitchens on you tube, and you will be well equipped to deal with just about anyone.
Best wishes

Welcome to reality.  I commend you for coming out with your Atheism.  I recommend immersing yourself in reality content. I have compiled a list of free films, videos, website, books, etc.. to help those seeking for logic, reason and truth.  My site is easy as heck to navigate because it's one page.  Take a look at http://www.charliescrusade.org.  Remember You Are Not Alone.


read "Why I am not a Christian" by Bertrand Russell.

Kaila - Skeptics Society is a great ongoing source for critical and rational thinking in all regards, most particularly religion and science.  They also have a weekly email newsletter. 


I like this very short video of Bertrand Russell.






Update Your Membership :



Nexus on Social Media:

© 2019   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: The Nexus Group.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service