ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN

Information

ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN

We debate origins of the Universe, life, Earth, humans, religion, atheism, using common sense, evolution, cosmology, geology, archaeology, and other sciences, to repel biblical creationism and other religious beliefs.

Location: Oxford University, England
Members: 4182
Latest Activity: Nov 17, 2016

The portrait is Charles Darwin, age 31, in 1840

We welcome comments and the opening up of new discussions in this busy group. So join us if you are not already in the group.

N.B. At the end of every discussion page is a box that you can tick if you want to be notified by e-mail about the arrival of fresh comments.

Discussion Forum

Drinking Coffee Associated with Lower Risk of Multiple Sclerosis

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Christopher Lowe Sep 14, 2016. 2 Replies

Neanderthals, Denisovans and ancestor X

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Joan Denoo Aug 7, 2016. 3 Replies

The evolution of work

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by Joan Denoo Jul 12, 2016. 61 Replies

Has man evolved?

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by John Elder Jun 18, 2016. 5 Replies

The Probability Of Being

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by John Elder Jun 11, 2016. 4 Replies

Living Relatives of Leonardo da Vinci have been Found

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Qiana-Maieev Apr 18, 2016. 6 Replies

Johns Hopkins Receives $125,000,000 to Fight Cancer

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by John Jubinsky Apr 1, 2016. 2 Replies

A new theory explaining the origins of life?

Started by Donald L. Engel. Last reply by Donald L. Engel Mar 31, 2016. 5 Replies

Map of Archaic Ancestry

Started by Qiana-Maieev. Last reply by Joseph P Mar 29, 2016. 5 Replies

Homo Erectus food processing

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Joan Denoo Mar 19, 2016. 1 Reply

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN to add comments!

Comment by Robert Tobin on November 18, 2010 at 9:36pm
When I was being indoctrinated into the "Holy" Roman Catholic Church in a jesuit 'concentration camp". Xavier College, we were told the wafer IS the body of Jesus Christ, not a symbol or representation. We had to believe it OR ELSE
Comment by Tony Davis on November 18, 2010 at 9:35pm
On the issue of "what Christians really believe" and the whole "is the wafer really Jesus' body and the wine really his blood... The idea of transubstantiation is official doctrine that it really does become the body and blood. Now, how many people REALLY believe that? I have no idea. It is a challenge I am facing while trying to write this book. I have to be VERY careful saying "Christians believe...." because as soon as I do I meet one who says "I don't believe that". And that happens on some pretty BIG issues! I am generally using the "guidelines" found in C.S. Lewis' "Mere Christianity" when talking about what Christians believe. If it's not in there I try to qualify it with "some" or "many". Hope that all makes sense.
Comment by Robert Tobin on November 18, 2010 at 9:32pm
With respect, I often why people can't spell: Bush go to the alter = altar
"Alter" means to change something
Comment by Gregg Deering on November 18, 2010 at 8:44pm
Hi Mike,

I agree totally. Work, kids, life I need to stop speed reading. Maybe christianity should be called "Paulism."
Comment by Susan Stanko on November 18, 2010 at 8:37pm
If Jesus was ever found it would destroy Christianity. he was supposed to be raised into heaven.
Comment by Joseph P on November 18, 2010 at 8:17pm
Claudia, I was raised Catholic, so I still curse like one. I picked that up, even if I never absorbed any of the religion. I say 'Christ' all the time.
Comment by Gregg Deering on November 18, 2010 at 7:11pm
I added your quote, what exactly did you mean?
Comment by Gregg Deering on November 18, 2010 at 6:55pm
Hi Claudia,

"because clearly everyone knows exactly who Jesus is" Please tell us more. The rest of your post seems to be the blind trying to lead the sighted?

Gregg
Comment by Gregg Deering on November 18, 2010 at 6:05pm
Sorry I don’t know all of acts, I played hooky at work and tried to googol “John/Acts” I got a virtuous Jew and a Roman Centurion - possible Johns in haste?

Anyway, I already commented on Paul, he cannot be used to show an Historical Jesus. The case for Myth is not conclusive, so there is plenty of room for debate. I just have come down on the side that I think fits the (lack) of evidence best.
Comment by Anton A. Hill on November 18, 2010 at 5:10pm
Hi all,

Not sure how often I'll be able to drop by here, but thanks for the invite.

Best,

Anton.
 

Members (4175)

 
 
 

line

Update Your Membership :

Membership

line

line

Nexus on Social Media:

line

© 2017   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service