We debate origins of the Universe, life, Earth, humans, religion, atheism, using common sense, evolution, cosmology, geology, archaeology, and other sciences, to repel biblical creationism and other religious beliefs.

Location: Oxford University, England
Members: 4195
Latest Activity: Aug 15

The portrait is Charles Darwin, age 31, in 1840

We welcome comments and the opening up of new discussions in this busy group. So join us if you are not already in the group.

N.B. At the end of every discussion page is a box that you can tick if you want to be notified by e-mail about the arrival of fresh comments.

Discussion Forum

Neanderthals, Denisovans and ancestor X

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Joan Denoo Aug 7. 3 Replies

The evolution of work

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by Joan Denoo Jul 12. 61 Replies

Has man evolved?

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by John Elder Jun 18. 5 Replies

The Probability Of Being

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by John Elder Jun 11. 4 Replies

Johns Hopkins Receives $125,000,000 to Fight Cancer

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by John Jubinsky Apr 1. 2 Replies

A new theory explaining the origins of life?

Started by Donald L. Engel. Last reply by Donald L. Engel Mar 31. 5 Replies

Map of Archaic Ancestry

Started by Qiana-Maieev. Last reply by Joseph P Mar 29. 5 Replies

Homo Erectus food processing

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Joan Denoo Mar 19. 1 Reply

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN to add comments!

Comment by Drew Carpenter on September 22, 2013 at 12:30am

You know, I never paid any attention to them until they "got in trouble." I am a fan now. 

Comment by Christopher Lowe on September 22, 2013 at 12:27am

I assume you're a Dixie Chicks fan then :)

Comment by Drew Carpenter on September 22, 2013 at 12:17am

I am "blessed to live in state that made Perry our longest serving governor and produced, in my opinion, the worst president we have ever seen. Texas was always a solidly democratic state until about thirty (read: Ronald Reagan) years ago. Now it is almost impossible to elect a democrat. Of course, the repubs have played a lot of dirty games with redistricting to help keep it that way.

Comment by Christopher Lowe on September 22, 2013 at 12:12am

In God's Country it seems convenient to foist problems upwards to the big guy in the sky and thus shirk responsibility. Remember Gov. Perry holding a rally to pray away the drought? Need I say more?

Comment by Drew Carpenter on September 21, 2013 at 11:59pm

Joan, do you think that people like Blankfein really believe that? Or are they just posturing to try and convince the gullible? It's disgusting either way, but I'm always curious about their sincerity. 

Comment by Christopher Lowe on September 21, 2013 at 11:57pm

And may God bless their bank accounts! Elizabeth Warren is slowly accumulating power and influence. Though it may be too late to chase these people out of Dodge for past deeds, maybe a warren lead group will put teeth in the regulations. Maybe with consequences for once. Reinstituting Glass-Steele (SP?) would go a long way  to getting some good behaviour out of the banks as well. Being used as guinea pigs for theories designed to line their pockets is dangerous and foolhardy way to run, heck, not the American economy, but the world economy. It's not monopoly money.

Comment by Drew Carpenter on September 21, 2013 at 11:50pm

Chris, Referring back to what you said here:

"Then there are those that simply cannot function in society. They just can't." 

This is where I feel that we are failing our citizens more than anywhere else. We stigmatize mental illness and emotional instability instead of sympathizing and offering the help that people need. My home state, Texas, is probably the worst example of this. Some other states offer better programs, but here there is virtually nothing available for them. This is especially true for men. Some people, as you said, will never be able to function on their own. And their are some who could if they were given help in the form of counseling, medications, etc. All I ever here people in this part of the country discuss is how expensive it would be to offer this kind of help. Even if it is costly, it should be offered purely for humanitarian reasons. But even if we ignore the humanitarian aspect, I don't know how to make these people (so called conservatives) understand that there is a huge financial cost to not doing it. Maybe I'm wrong, but I have to think that in the long run that cost is greater.

You were correct earlier when you stated that we will have to make some difficult choices in this country. The interest on our deficit is so large that if we did not have it we could easily fund all of the social programs that we have now and still offer more.

I worry about extremists in both parties because our politics and our people have become so polarized that we can't get anything done. There was a time when we were able to accomplish some things by compromise. Now, no one wants to credit the other side with having any validity to their ideas. As for the republicans, they seem to be driven soley by ideology at this time. That is the death of rational thought, in my opinion.

Comment by Joan Denoo on September 21, 2013 at 8:33pm

Remember way back in November, 2009 in an interview with the Sunday Times Lloyd Blankfein, of Goldman Sachs stated, ""I'm doing God's work"?

Lloyd Blankfein Says He Is Doing "God's Work"

I think Blankfein and the rest of the Obama group actually believed they were doing god's work. Non of the group is embarrassed, none has been charged with crimes. They all continue to get their claws on more and more of middle class money. Obama even wanted to replace Bernanke with Larry Summers, part of the Rubin Pack. 

Why has the public not risen up in arms and made demands? Where are the Democrats? Who benefits by all the deafening silence? 

Robert Rubin’s protégés: Timothy Geithner, Rahm Emanuel, Alan Greenspan, Gene Sperling, Jason Furman, James Stock, Jacob Lew, Penny Pritzker, and Sylvia Mathews Burwell. 

“Rubinites demand to be put in charge of the Fed because they’ve caused so many more crises than Yellen that they have vastly more experience trying to deal with crises.  When we were financial regulators we found it desirable to avoid creating crises.  Summers and Rubin did not respond well to the crises they helped cause.  Their “solutions” caused great misery in much of the world for decades.”

~ William K. Black

Posted on New Economic Perspectives,

September 3, 2013 by Devin Smith

That misery of which William Black speaks comes directly from the likes of these financial institutions, facilitated by their religious beliefs. "We are successful because we do god's work!"

Comment by Christopher Lowe on September 21, 2013 at 7:11pm

Hey Drew, In no way was I associating you with Ms Rand, but I was saying that those whose frustrations you say are driving voters to the GOP should be aware of one of their more influential pied pipers.

The more you elaborate on the problems facing your country, the more sense you make. I like your idea of tailoring  education to prepare the kids to the real time realities they will be dealing with. Too many kids miss opportunities because skill deficits caused by opportunities not made available to them. It doesn't have to be at the detriment of the liberal arts. That is needed for the creativity so essential to civilization.. Education should be the crown jewel of a society. 

I refuse to believe that a significant amount of those on the rolls of welfare are there out of choice. Given the opportunity most would jump at the chance to become a contributing taxpaying member of society. Many are trapped by economic realities. Too, you have to have money to make money so destitution can hamper one's ability to show up for work, both on time and reasonably presentable. Then there are those that simply cannot function in society. They just can't. There are myriad causes for this, but these people can't be punished or derided for their faults and/or disabilities. To me it's a moral obligation to help these people and with kindness. This is the tendency of most developed countries. They shouldn't be mocked or made to sing for their supper as some politicians imply or outright advocate.

Efficiencies and common sense should drive the programs now in place. Incentivizing welfare recipients to self sufficiency through job skills and life skills training. This will more than pay for itself in the long run. Like you say and I heartily agree they need to be smarter in the way they deal with these programs and that both sides should stop their rhetorical food fight and really try to find common ground.

As a non American please permit me to say I find the political stances taken weird. A lot of it doesn't compute even though I have a better than average knowledge of American political history. 


Comment by Drew Carpenter on September 21, 2013 at 5:08pm

Of course I was not saying that we should abandon the poor. I'm saying that we need to be smarter about the way in which we help them so that we can move as many people as possible away from dependency. The most important part of that is to do things in a smarter way, and the first place I would start is by raising the minimum wage. All work needs to pay a living wage, and I don't accept any excuse for its not doing so. The conservatives always scream that it is a job killer but it always seems to have the opposite effect. 

Yes, poverty is a fact of life. But to just accept is as a permanent fact of life and continually treat the symptoms rather than the disease is the real cop out. We will never eliminate it completely but it is a goal that we should always be working towards. We will always have a welfare system, but a system that feeds on itself is a failure.

Yes, Obama had to clean up the mess. And I think he did a pretty good job. Despite all the hand-wringing, the tarp proram was a success and the money has been coming back in. 

I don't believe in trickle down economics, not at all. They may like to say that "a rising tide lifts all boats," but as long as more and more money is flowing into fewer hands, that idea is a failur. I would never associate redistribution of wealth with trickle down. Just the opposite. And I don't depend on corporations for job growth. Education is the key, and not the way we have been doing it. Our public schools try to give everyone the same liberal arts education whether they are suited for it or not. There is a point where we need to direct these kids into job skills, and since we have failed to do so for this long, we need to offer that opportunity to the adults who have no skills. the problem with the existing programs is that they dole out money to companies that charge way to much and provide too little in return. I don't see that changing as long as special interests have so much influence over dems and repubs. And yes, that comes back to no programs getting any traction that looks beyond the next election cycle. That is true even when officials are newly elected, because their are always votes two years down the road that even four and six year term pols have to worry about. In case you are wondering, I'm registered as a democrat and vote almost exclusively democrat. That doesn't mean that I am happy with what they are doing. And yes, I'm a dem because most of the extremists are on the republican side. And that shift of so much of the middle too the Reupblican party is largely responsible for the dems moving too far too the left.

It seems silly to associate with me Ayn Rand simply because I believe in finding a better way to do things.


Members (4192)



Update Your Membership :




Nexus on Social Media:


© 2016   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service