We debate origins of the Universe, life, Earth, humans, religion, atheism, using common sense, evolution, cosmology, geology, archaeology, and other sciences, to repel biblical creationism and other religious beliefs.

Location: Oxford University, England
Members: 4181
Latest Activity: yesterday

The portrait is Charles Darwin, age 31, in 1840

We welcome comments and the opening up of new discussions in this busy group. So join us if you are not already in the group.

N.B. At the end of every discussion page is a box that you can tick if you want to be notified by e-mail about the arrival of fresh comments.

Discussion Forum

Part Ape Part Human

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Gerald Payne on Thursday. 4 Replies

Researchers May Have Detected More to Stonehenge

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Madhukar Kulkarni Oct 7. 6 Replies

1st Human Head Transplant Scheduled for 2017

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Madhukar Kulkarni Oct 7. 16 Replies

Sam Harris The Case Against Christianity

Started by dudaboli yev. Last reply by Gary Canup Oct 2. 2 Replies

Mystery Solved: Water DOES Flow on Mars

Started by Steph S.. Last reply by Gary Canup Sep 30. 2 Replies

Cave Dwellers Ground Flour 32,000 Years Ago

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Bertold Brautigan Sep 22. 2 Replies

Ancestral humans had more DNA

Started by Steph S.. Last reply by Joseph P Sep 4. 8 Replies

Cancer Changed to Normal Cell Growth in Lab

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Joseph P Sep 4. 3 Replies

Researhers Turn Off Obesity Gene in Mice

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Susan Stanko Aug 22. 5 Replies

Mini moons may zip around Earth

Started by Steph S.. Last reply by Gerald Payne Aug 19. 3 Replies

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN to add comments!

Comment by Joseph P on April 14, 2015 at 8:14pm

Wow!  My dad only burned me with cigarettes.  Was I a lucky kid or what?

Compared to what one girl I know had done to her by her ultra-conservative Mormon parents, yeah, you were lucky.

"Yeah, your brother raped you repeatedly and threw you up against the wall repeatedly, but you're a horrible person to expect us to report it and destroy family unity."

Of course there was never any kind of punishment imposed on the brother by the parents, either.

As for your basic point, though ...

I've never understood how the redemption through the sacrifice of Jesus makes sense to anyone.  Just at face value, it always seemed utterly silly to me.  How does it have any effect upon anything if an omnipotent being decides to hang out in a human body for a few decades and have himself brutally beaten and executed?  On the grand scale of things, how does anyone think that will have the slightest impact upon our supposed sins?

Even leaving aside the ridiculousness of the basic proposition, there are at least a half-dozen other points at which I have a major issue.  Christians say that Yahweh had to do that, in order for him to forgive our sins and let us into heaven ... some flimsy excuse about how his infinitely perfect sense of justice made it so he had to do it.

We're talking about an infinite, omnipotent being here.  How does "have to" come into it, in any way?

Comment by Lemual Poot on April 14, 2015 at 6:45pm

My favorite theist jumps over and around all logic is, "Jesus died for your sins." And, "God sent his son to suffer and die for us." Huh!  So many times I've asked, "Could you explain that?"

What a brilliant plan.  First off, this god character rapes a virgin for the purpose of filicide.  Then he takes the rotting corpse with him and has the dead kid's buddies start a cult.  That cult then plunges the world into two millennium of ignorance, plague, and pestilence.  All the while, amassing history’s greatest collection of murders, rapes, and genocide.  Proof positive that god loves us.  Did I get all that right?

Wow!  My dad only burned me with cigarettes.  Was I a lucky kid or what?  

Comment by Susan Stanko on February 21, 2015 at 11:18am

No, I was quoting Dr. Meaden's post.  Trying to understand what he just said.

Comment by Lemual Poot on February 21, 2015 at 10:45am


Is the charter you quoted the same one that Elenor Roosvelt dedicated her life to?  I had thought it didn't get ratified until the fifties sometime.  It's such a shame that a beautiful documment such as that could b so ignored by the very countries that signed it!

Comment by Lemual Poot on February 21, 2015 at 10:42am

Comment by Lemual Poot on February 21, 2015 at 10:40am

"People say they want to be free and decide their own fate, but in reality, they want a strong, charismatic leader, in which they can put all their faith and destinies."

Adolf Hitler

Comment by Joseph P on February 20, 2015 at 7:46pm

That's what you have to watch out for in arguments in Christian apologetics, Lemual.  They switch definitions at will, often between step 1 and step 2 of an argument.

God is Love.  You feel love.  Therefore God exists.  And no, I'm not parodying a Christian argument to try to make it look stupid.  That is the argument, exactly as made by many Christians.  It's called an equivocation fallacy.

Comment by Susan Stanko on February 20, 2015 at 1:53pm

Nonetheless, it seems that it was a cerebral condition of a determined man that looks like wrecking our wish for a democratic world with its wonderful human rights charter of 1948.


Comment by Lemual Poot on February 20, 2015 at 12:13pm

I like the way they switch around definitions to suit the situation.  Take the word myth for example.  We all know the entire whole story, from the talking snake to the disappearing corpse trick to be myth, but "they" define it as religion.  Better yet is the word, faith.  If I insisted that Harvey the giant, talking rabbit was real, and controlled every aspect of life, would their diagnosis be, “Strong, deep seated faith in Harvey?”

Comment by Joseph P on February 20, 2015 at 9:59am


I have always thought it rather ironic that we as a society administer anti-psychotic drugs to those people who have trouble differentiating between actual reality and their own self-created world (i.e., Schizophrenia), yet we in no way consider those who pray to and believe in supernatural entities to have any form of mental illness.

A lot of the important difference there is the difference between neurotic disorders and psychotic disorders, I think.  Generally (with fairly simplistic definitions), neurotic disorders are usually stress-induced, while psychotic disorders are usually genetic/chemical.  Both types can sometimes be treated with drugs, but the more important point is how that causal distinction applies to religion, as you're speaking on the subject.

Religion would usually be classed as a neurotic disorder, if you want to extend the mental illness metaphor to the breaking point.  It's the result of childhood brainwashing ... ie. stress-induction (not exactly stress, but we're working with metaphors here).  Now, you have some people who audibly hear Yahweh speaking back to them.  They're probably bringing along their own clinical psychosis, which reinforces the childhood indoctrination.  Some good anti-psychotics could probably make the voice of Yahweh go away, but you'd have to convince the psychotic religious person that that would be a good thing, first.

Then there's the perspective of rationality, as opposed to literal insanity.  We often consider rationality to be the antonym of insanity, but it really isn't, if we're talking about clinical insanity.  Believing that someone walked on water, because a storybook said so, when we've never seen anyone do it in real life, without the use of stage magic props, is irrational as hell.  But I don't think that comparing that to clinical insanity is necessarily fair.

This sort of thing is more a matter of an educational deficiency.  Our school system does a shit job of teaching students critical thinking and the scientific method, in most school districts (mine were great, but then I grew up in wealthy, suburban school-districts).  And now we have the various fundamentalist, religious leaders in this country actively trying to suppress critical thinking courses in grade schools, because ... well, of course they are; they know a threat when they see one.

I like to describe Pentecostals and other extreme religious sorts as being insane, when I'm in a pejorative sort of mood, but if we're really analyzing the situation, it isn't that simple.


Members (4181)


© 2015   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service