We debate origins of the Universe, life, Earth, humans, religion, atheism, using common sense, evolution, cosmology, geology, archaeology, and other sciences, to repel biblical creationism and other religious beliefs.

Location: Oxford University, England
Members: 4182
Latest Activity: Nov 17

The portrait is Charles Darwin, age 31, in 1840

We welcome comments and the opening up of new discussions in this busy group. So join us if you are not already in the group.

N.B. At the end of every discussion page is a box that you can tick if you want to be notified by e-mail about the arrival of fresh comments.

Discussion Forum

Neanderthals, Denisovans and ancestor X

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Joan Denoo Aug 7. 3 Replies

The evolution of work

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by Joan Denoo Jul 12. 61 Replies

Has man evolved?

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by John Elder Jun 18. 5 Replies

The Probability Of Being

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by John Elder Jun 11. 4 Replies

Johns Hopkins Receives $125,000,000 to Fight Cancer

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by John Jubinsky Apr 1. 2 Replies

A new theory explaining the origins of life?

Started by Donald L. Engel. Last reply by Donald L. Engel Mar 31. 5 Replies

Map of Archaic Ancestry

Started by Qiana-Maieev. Last reply by Joseph P Mar 29. 5 Replies

Homo Erectus food processing

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Joan Denoo Mar 19. 1 Reply

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN to add comments!

Comment by Anton A. Hill on November 18, 2010 at 5:10pm
Hi all,

Not sure how often I'll be able to drop by here, but thanks for the invite.


Comment by Joseph P on November 18, 2010 at 4:28pm
Comment by Tony Davis on November 18, 2010 at 4:11pm
ohhh myyy goddd... I am SUCH a moron! OK, doing pushups now as penance... (still in the military for a few more months!)
Comment by Tony Davis on November 18, 2010 at 3:59pm
Dr. Meaden - Fascinating point, for me at least. Just a few days ago I thought I had made up the word "atheologist", then you replied back with some great information. And today I was reading John Shook's new book "The God Debates" (which he signed for me the other night in DC) and on page 13 he talks about this: "Atheology is the intellectual effort to explain why a worldview should not include any god."

Interesting book so far!

Comment by Joseph P on November 18, 2010 at 3:59pm
Peter, Paul, and Mary ... no, nothing?
Comment by Tony Davis on November 18, 2010 at 3:54pm
Mike - No worries. Easy enough to do!

Joseph - Sorry buddy, not following ya. Can you explain a bit and help me out? :-)
Comment by Joseph P on November 18, 2010 at 3:33pm
What about Mary? She completes the trio.
Comment by Tony Davis on November 18, 2010 at 12:36pm
Forgive my ignorance guys, but aren't we confusing Peter with Paul? It was Saul of Tarsus, great persecutor of Christians, who was struck blind by a great light, who became Paul, later St. Paul and the most influential person in Christianity (even more influential that Christ himself if you study it historically)....

Or did Peter also have epilepsy? ;-p
Comment by Gregg Deering on November 18, 2010 at 12:20pm
Mike, Acts dated later than the Gospels, even Christian theologians stay away from using Acts to prove anything. There was no Peter. Some one may have to break the news to Christopher....?
Comment by Gregg Deering on November 18, 2010 at 9:18am
It’s always struck me as weird, if the discussion was who has a better chance of being real Odysseus or Robin Hood, would there be a heated argument, and I doubt it.

A – Jesus was in Jerusalem, and according to the Bible had hundreds of followers. We have more information on many lesser individuals at the time. The info we have on Jesus by Romans is probably forged by later Christians. What we have is a Messianic claimant in the center of the Middle East and no one noticed?
B) But if Peter the Ditch Digger became the savior of humanity would we be having this debate? Wouldn’t it be easier to make this Peter up? By the way read about Paul – he had no interest in finding anything about the “real” Jesus. He knew nothing about him; he must have been the least curious person in history. Yet – he’s considered an authority?

To find out about Peter, the Brother of the Lord and a lot of cool things try (if you are the academic type) to take a look at this site, there are intelligent people on both sides of the Historical/Myth fence

My major problem is with people playing “I think” or “just so” ideas without evidence is that it’s little more than “feel good-ism”. It’s the last reality lifeline we throw Christians, “He must have been a very wise man.” But find that man? He’s a god, in a book about a god’s story and we can not forget that. Could you strip away the legend of Santa Clause to find the real St. Nick - or even a plain Nick witha long white beard an a weight issue? Even Jesus’ last words on the cross were lifted from the Psalms - the oldest OT writing we have. Again, we don’t even know if his name was Jesus, if it was a “him” of course.

Oddly this is the only case I am aware of where wide variants of a story about the life and teachings of an individual spread across Africa and Asia minor and Europe and this mass is narrowed through power struggles (in the 4th century) – and that this “Life” gets whittled down to 4 books (ok 4-6 plus letters). Those in control these books do their best to destroy the other 99% of available Christian information. Generally it works the other way, a simple story is embellished my many cultures and spreads as it becomes embellished and mythologized. Oddly with Christianity just the opposite happened.

Members (4182)



Update Your Membership :




Nexus on Social Media:


© 2016   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service