We debate origins of the Universe, life, Earth, humans, religion, atheism, using common sense, evolution, cosmology, geology, archaeology, and other sciences, to repel biblical creationism and other religious beliefs.

Location: Oxford University, England
Members: 4181
Latest Activity: yesterday

The portrait is Charles Darwin, age 31, in 1840

We welcome comments and the opening up of new discussions in this busy group. So join us if you are not already in the group.

N.B. At the end of every discussion page is a box that you can tick if you want to be notified by e-mail about the arrival of fresh comments.

Discussion Forum

Part Ape Part Human

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Gerald Payne yesterday. 4 Replies

Researchers May Have Detected More to Stonehenge

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Madhukar Kulkarni on Wednesday. 6 Replies

Pope Makes Annulment of Marriages Faster, Easier and Cheaper

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Madhukar Kulkarni on Wednesday. 8 Replies

1st Human Head Transplant Scheduled for 2017

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Madhukar Kulkarni on Wednesday. 16 Replies

Sam Harris The Case Against Christianity

Started by dudaboli yev. Last reply by Gary Canup Oct 2. 2 Replies

Mystery Solved: Water DOES Flow on Mars

Started by Steph S.. Last reply by Gary Canup Sep 30. 2 Replies

Cave Dwellers Ground Flour 32,000 Years Ago

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Bertold Brautigan Sep 22. 2 Replies

Ancestral humans had more DNA

Started by Steph S.. Last reply by Joseph P Sep 4. 8 Replies

Cancer Changed to Normal Cell Growth in Lab

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Joseph P Sep 4. 3 Replies

Researhers Turn Off Obesity Gene in Mice

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Susan Stanko Aug 22. 5 Replies

Mini moons may zip around Earth

Started by Steph S.. Last reply by Gerald Payne Aug 19. 3 Replies

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN to add comments!

Comment by Hitman on February 13, 2010 at 1:51pm
@ Marc thanks for that. Would love to read your paper.
Comment by Sally Morem on February 9, 2010 at 6:12pm
Thanks Stephen for the link.

"The team found that the cellular machinery needed to create mitochondria was constructed from parts pre-existing in the bacterium. These parts did other jobs for the bacterium, and were cobbled together by evolution to do something new and more exciting."

Another piece of evidence that show Behe's irreducible complexity idea is irreducibly silly.
Comment by Marc Draco on February 7, 2010 at 3:06pm
Hitman, your friend has his factoids all of a muddle.

Mutation is (in essence) random. Selection is not. Evolution is therefore a random process guided by selection.

Evolution doesn't fix dates; but knowing how A evolved into C can help you pinpoint B in a rock strata by predicting when and where it should be. This has been used to find previously undiscovered fossils.

As for disability: if we assume a disability is a mutation then some disabilities might give a person an advantage. Humans have messed it up by trying to fix everything that nature produces but in nature, mutation continues unperturbed and mutations - often incredibly slight - over time will occasionally give advantages.

I've done a paper on this (applied to language) with examples if you want to see it.
Comment by Hitman on February 7, 2010 at 2:53pm
A friend is claiming this is a contradiction between dates given for the age of humans by evolution theorists and the archaeologists. I have never come across this arguement before. He is going to send me his evidence. Does evolution fix dates?
Another friend, when I argued that evolution wasn't random, said we claimed the mutations are. Doesn't that mean that every disability is 'designed'?
Comment by Sally Morem on February 7, 2010 at 12:47pm
After reading "Chaos" I read a number of other books related in theme. I wrote a lengthy essay linking the ideas discussed in these books called "The Grassroots Creation." Check it out here:
Comment by Steve Nelson on February 7, 2010 at 11:55am
Sally, I'll have to look for that book. Sounds interesting. I personally can't wait till religion is in the dust bin of history. I just think of the MILLIONS who have died because of religions. It is astounding! My stories about the future are about this. Yes they are erotic. So what. I don't think Sex is a Dirty Thing. I believe sex is Normal, Natural and Necessary for humans to function properly. So that's what my stories are about. TW1 and TW2 Desert Trek. Look'em up here on my blog or by Googling my name and story titles. Please Enjoy.
"Chaos" reminds me of Jeff goldblume in Jarrasic Park. Sincerely Yours, Steve Nelson
Comment by Sally Morem on February 7, 2010 at 10:45am
Ever since I read "Chaos" by James Gleick, I've looked for and found self-organizing systems everywhere, in physical, biological and cultural systems. I've always been an evolutionist, but the idea of self-organization has given me additional insights on how it works.

Self-organization is one of the most counter-intuitive notions we humans have ever stumbled upon. Since we are toolmakers by trade, our natural inclination is to assume everything is made...the way we would make things. Hence the idea of gods and goddesses busy manufacturing trees and rocks and storms, etc.

It will be a long time before the insights we gain through science on self-organizing systems nudge this idea of "making" into "the dustbin of history." Unfortunately.
Comment by Steve Nelson on January 3, 2010 at 10:36am
Swell Julia, I'll get on it soon. Thanks again all you wonderful folks, Steve Nelson
Comment by Steve Nelson on December 31, 2009 at 6:41am
WoW! Such a lot of nice Intelligent and really usefule comments that have come from this nice sight in just a couple of days or even hours since I made a comment and asked a question. It is really wonderful to hear from so many swell people. I've been at other sights where I put out my thoughts and feelings and hopes and people were just rude and inconsiderate to the max. But here, Is A Complete difference! You know I've always thought that it shouldn't be too dang hard to convert from using pencil & Ink to something in a digital realm. And from my experience in business I fiund it wasn't too afully brainy to by my candy bars at say .25 and turn around and sell'em at .50. It's ust a common sence thing.
This site seems to be full of a bunch of people with a common sence, Can do attitude, I Love It!
Thank You so much everyone, and thanks again to Dr Meaden for getting it going to start with. Sincerely, Steve Nelson

PS. Some have asked me why my book is only about 123 pages and I always answer, well I took my lead from a couple of things, 1) I liked Mr Hubbards book Battlefield Earth, (Read the whole dang thing in about a week), but I didn't want anything I wrote to be Quite that long. And 2) I was going through my library and found one of the smallest yet acceptable books in the publishing world to be PLanet of the Apes at only about 120 pages. And I figured if a movie could be made of a book that size well I guess I'm pretty safe then.
I hope nobody minds much but at the end of my first book I had the hero of the story remembering the movie he once saw at a drive-in and think to himself of the line in that picture, 'Beware the beast Man for he will make a desert of his home and yours', it kinda really fit too so I stuck it in there. Happy day and New Year Everyone! Steve Nelson
Comment by Rodrigo M Vasquez on December 31, 2009 at 3:49am
I work with 3D and VFX and , while Math is very very important to run the "hardcore" stuff ( creating scripts, shaders, and simulations from scratch,) what matters is the ability to learn AND the dedication to search for, and use, the RIGHT TOOLS FOR THE RIGHT TASK.
Math is a beautiful, but if what you want is to illustrate, Computers nowadays don't build those high walls as they did 20 years ago.
There is a lot of help on sites like Gnomon, and Digitaltutors and Lindacom, Books and DVD's, to learn how to use software for illustrative purposes.
Buying books about Digital paint, and illustration , is a good start. Books of design, sketch and Color theory to expand your knowledge and so on.
Formal education is important, you can't get on the big names without it, but looks like you already have a background on illustration, so why not go for it on Digital. It changes nothing from paper to digital, but as any business you need to make a name, showing your work, and reach a level of mastery and performance that grants you the big $$$.

Members (4180)


© 2015   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service